Lululemon Athletica Inc. (TSX: LULU.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (TSX: LULU.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, TJX.TO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.TO is priced at CA$4.33 on the TSX, while TJX.TO trades at CA$22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas TJX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, LULU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TJX.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.TO is more volatile compared to TJX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.TO.Check TJX.TO's competition here

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (TSX: LULU.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, LULU.NE has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.TO is priced at CA$4.33 on the TSX, while LULU.NE trades at CA$4.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas LULU.NE's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, LULU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LULU.NE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.TO is more volatile compared to LULU.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.TO.Check LULU.NE's competition here

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (TSX: LULU.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, ATZ.TO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.TO is priced at CA$4.33 on the TSX, while ATZ.TO trades at CA$123.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas ATZ.TO's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, LULU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ATZ.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.TO is less volatile compared to ATZ.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.TO.Check ATZ.TO's competition here

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (TSX: LULU.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, GRGD.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.TO is priced at CA$4.33 on the TSX, while GRGD.TO trades at CA$55.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas GRGD.TO's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, LULU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to GRGD.TO's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.TO is less volatile compared to GRGD.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.TO.Check GRGD.TO's competition here

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (TSX: LULU.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, ROOT.TO has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.TO is priced at CA$4.33 on the TSX, while ROOT.TO trades at CA$4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas ROOT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, LULU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ROOT.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.TO is more volatile compared to ROOT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.TO.Check ROOT.TO's competition here