Romeo Power, Inc.
Romeo Power, Inc. (RMO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RMO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMO | $0.35 | -3.18% | 0 | -0.29 | -$1.23 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $68.24 | -2.33% | 14.9B | 11.32 | $6.03 | N/A |
| MBLY | $14.36 | -5.40% | 11.8B | -3.93 | -$3.65 | N/A |
| MGA | $41.50 | -2.38% | 11.7B | 10.35 | $4.01 | +4.61% |
| ALV | $114.01 | -1.73% | 8.8B | 12.51 | $9.12 | +2.43% |
| LKQ | $30.47 | -3.24% | 7.8B | 11.12 | $2.74 | +3.92% |
| BWA | $35.14 | -1.76% | 7.7B | 24.74 | $1.42 | +1.25% |
| ALSN | $88.30 | +0.27% | 7.4B | 10.23 | $8.64 | +1.18% |
| GNTX | $27.46 | -1.65% | 6.2B | 15.51 | $1.77 | +1.76% |
Stock Comparison
RMO vs APTV-PA Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check APTV-PA's competition here
RMO vs APTV Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while APTV trades at $68.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check APTV's competition here
RMO vs MBLY Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while MBLY trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check MBLY's competition here
RMO vs MGA Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while MGA trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check MGA's competition here
RMO vs ALV Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while ALV trades at $114.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check ALV's competition here
RMO vs LKQ Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while LKQ trades at $30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check LKQ's competition here
RMO vs BWA Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while BWA trades at $35.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check BWA's competition here
RMO vs ALSN Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while ALSN trades at $88.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check ALSN's competition here
RMO vs GNTX Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while GNTX trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check GNTX's competition here
RMO vs MOD Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while MOD trades at $111.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check MOD's competition here
RMO vs QS Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while QS trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check QS's competition here
RMO vs LEA Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while LEA trades at $96.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check LEA's competition here
RMO vs BC-PA Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while BC-PA trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check BC-PA's competition here
RMO vs BC-PB Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check BC-PB's competition here
RMO vs DORM Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while DORM trades at $121.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check DORM's competition here
RMO vs VC Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while VC trades at $113.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check VC's competition here
RMO vs GT Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while GT trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check GT's competition here
RMO vs HSAI Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while HSAI trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2041.00. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check HSAI's competition here
RMO vs GTX Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while GTX trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check GTX's competition here
RMO vs DAN Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while DAN trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -67.12. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check DAN's competition here
RMO vs PHIN Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while PHIN trades at $53.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check PHIN's competition here
RMO vs ADNT Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while ADNT trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check ADNT's competition here
RMO vs FOXF Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while FOXF trades at $30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check FOXF's competition here
RMO vs AEVA Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while AEVA trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check AEVA's competition here
RMO vs THRM Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while THRM trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 33.61. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check THRM's competition here
RMO vs XPEL Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 932.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while XPEL trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check XPEL's competition here
RMO vs SMP Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 705M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while SMP trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check SMP's competition here
RMO vs PLOW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 667.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while PLOW trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check PLOW's competition here
RMO vs GTXAP Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check GTXAP's competition here
RMO vs AXL Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 551.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while AXL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check AXL's competition here
RMO vs ECX Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 529.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while ECX trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check ECX's competition here
RMO vs ALLG Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check ALLG's competition here
RMO vs MNRO Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 489.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while MNRO trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -74.18. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check MNRO's competition here
RMO vs MLR Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 478.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while MLR trades at $41.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check MLR's competition here
RMO vs SES Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 458.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while SES trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check SES's competition here
RMO vs CPS Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 434.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while CPS trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check CPS's competition here
RMO vs INVZW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 348.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while INVZW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check INVZW's competition here
RMO vs INVZ Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 326.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while INVZ trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check INVZ's competition here
RMO vs HYLN Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 270.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while HYLN trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check HYLN's competition here
RMO vs STRT Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 270.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while STRT trades at $64.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check STRT's competition here
RMO vs HLLY Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while HLLY trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check HLLY's competition here
RMO vs HLLY-WT Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 240.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
RMO vs SRI Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while SRI trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check SRI's competition here
RMO vs MPAA Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while MPAA trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check MPAA's competition here
RMO vs XL Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check XL's competition here
RMO vs LAZR Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while LAZR trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check LAZR's competition here
RMO vs CAAS Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while CAAS trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check CAAS's competition here
RMO vs GGR Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 112.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while GGR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check GGR's competition here
RMO vs KNDI Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while KNDI trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check KNDI's competition here
RMO vs WPRT Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while WPRT trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check WPRT's competition here
RMO vs LIDR Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while LIDR trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check LIDR's competition here
RMO vs CVGI Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while CVGI trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check CVGI's competition here
RMO vs LIDRW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while LIDRW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check LIDRW's competition here
RMO vs SYPR Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while SYPR trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -99.50. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check SYPR's competition here
RMO vs MKDW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while MKDW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check MKDW's competition here
RMO vs ECXWW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while ECXWW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check ECXWW's competition here
RMO vs NCNCW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check NCNCW's competition here
RMO vs NCNC Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check NCNC's competition here
RMO vs AMV Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check AMV's competition here
RMO vs WKSP Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while WKSP trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check WKSP's competition here
RMO vs INEO Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while INEO trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check INEO's competition here
RMO vs SAG Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check SAG's competition here
RMO vs SUP Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check SUP's competition here
RMO vs CREV Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while CREV trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check CREV's competition here
RMO vs FRSX Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while FRSX trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check FRSX's competition here
RMO vs GGROW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check GGROW's competition here
RMO vs MKDWW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check MKDWW's competition here
RMO vs UFAB Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check UFAB's competition here
RMO vs WKSPW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check WKSPW's competition here
RMO vs CREVW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 187K. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while CREVW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check CREVW's competition here
RMO vs HYZNW Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check HYZNW's competition here
RMO vs HZN Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check HZN's competition here
RMO vs VNE Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check VNE's competition here
RMO vs MTOR Comparison July 2025
RMO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMO stands at 0. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RMO is priced at $0.35, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.29, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, RMO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RMO is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMO.Check MTOR's competition here