Rocket Companies, Inc.
Rocket Companies, Inc. RKT Peers
See (RKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKT | $12.77 | -0.23% | 25.5B | 638.50 | $0.02 | +6.26% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | N/A | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| UWMC | $4.20 | +2.19% | 9.1B | -52.44 | -$0.08 | +9.56% |
| COOP | $131.28 | -0.59% | 8.4B | 14.64 | $8.97 | N/A |
| UWMC-WT | $0.11 | -9.73% | 8.1B | N/A | N/A | +9.56% |
| PFSI | $95.69 | +0.74% | 4.9B | 14.68 | $6.52 | +1.25% |
| WD | $68.31 | +1.38% | 2.3B | 23.39 | $2.92 | +3.86% |
| ECPG | $38.37 | +3.01% | 895.9M | -7.91 | -$4.85 | N/A |
| GHLD | $14.33 | -3.01% | 891.2M | 20.18 | $0.71 | +3.49% |
| VEL | $17.08 | +1.97% | 623.3M | 8.85 | $1.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RKT vs MMAC Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs UWMC Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while UWMC trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is -52.44. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs COOP Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while COOP trades at $131.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs UWMC-WT Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs PFSI Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while PFSI trades at $95.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs WD Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while WD trades at $68.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs ECPG Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 895.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while ECPG trades at $38.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECPG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs GHLD Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 891.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while GHLD trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs VEL Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 623.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while VEL trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs LDI Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 429.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while LDI trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs ATAX Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs HMPT Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs ONIT Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 298.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while ONIT trades at $37.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs GHI Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 279.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while GHI trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs SNFCA Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while SNFCA trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs OCN Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs BETR Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 173.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while BETR trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BETR's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs IOR Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while IOR trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs IMH Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMH's ROE of +47.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs CNF Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while CNF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs BETRW Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while BETRW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs PAPL Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 828.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.77, while PAPL trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 638.50, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.