Rocket Companies, Inc.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 12.69B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while UWMC trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.26B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while MMAC trades at $27.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAI has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAI trades at $9.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAI's P/E ratio is 1420.00. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCKJ has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCKJ trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCKJ's P/E ratio is 171.18. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCKJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCKJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 7.52B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while COOP trades at $117.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMA has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMA trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAJ has a market cap of 7.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAJ trades at $10.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAJ's P/E ratio is 1441.43. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAO has a market cap of 7.39B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAO trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAO's P/E ratio is 2428.57. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAM has a market cap of 7.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAM trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAM's P/E ratio is 2642.86. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to FNMAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAT has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAT trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAT's P/E ratio is 1608.57. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAH has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAH trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAH's P/E ratio is 1318.57. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAS has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAS trades at $12.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAS's P/E ratio is 1754.29. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAG has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAG trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAG's P/E ratio is 2792.86. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMFN has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMFN trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMFN's P/E ratio is 2900.00. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMFN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMFM has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMFM trades at $16.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMFM's P/E ratio is 2352.86. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMFM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAN has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAN trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAN's P/E ratio is 2500.00. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAK has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAK trades at $17.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAK's P/E ratio is 2494.29. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAL has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAL trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAL's P/E ratio is 2517.14. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to FNMAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMFO has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMFO trades at $39,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMFO's P/E ratio is 5571428.57. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMFO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNMAP has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNMAP trades at $16.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNMAP's P/E ratio is 2365.71. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNMAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNMAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while PFSI trades at $97.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCI has a market cap of 3.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCI trades at $16.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCI's P/E ratio is 240.88. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FREGP has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FREGP trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FREGP's P/E ratio is 242.65. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FREGP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FREGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCC has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCC trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCC's P/E ratio is -261.15. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCKI has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCKI trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCKI's P/E ratio is 136.32. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCKI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCK has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCK trades at $16.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCK's P/E ratio is 237.35. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCJ has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCJ trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCJ's P/E ratio is 234.41. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to FMCCJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCKM has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCKM trades at $9.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCKM's P/E ratio is 133.68. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCKM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCN has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCN trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCN's P/E ratio is 241.18. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCM has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCM trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCM's P/E ratio is 237.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCKN has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCKN trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCKN's P/E ratio is 135.15. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCKN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCG has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCG trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCG's P/E ratio is 235.29. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCP has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCP trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCP's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCKO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCKO trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCKO's P/E ratio is 136.03. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCKO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCKK has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCKK trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCKK's P/E ratio is -1178.57. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCKK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to FMCKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCL has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCL trades at $16.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCL's P/E ratio is 239.12. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FREJN has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FREJN trades at $16.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FREJN's P/E ratio is 238.53. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FREJN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FREJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCT has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCT trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCT's P/E ratio is 261.03. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCKP has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCKP trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCKP's P/E ratio is 239.56. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCKP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCH has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCH trades at $16.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCH's P/E ratio is 238.24. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCO trades at $16.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCO's P/E ratio is 239.26. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCKL has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCKL trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCKL's P/E ratio is 135.07. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCKL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FMCKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FMCCS has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FMCCS trades at $15.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FMCCS's P/E ratio is 228.53. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMCCS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to FMCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while WD trades at $72.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FNLIF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FNLIF trades at $27.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FNLIF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNLIF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FNLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, HMCBF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while HMCBF trades at $32.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas HMCBF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HMCBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to HMCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 832.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while ECPG trades at $35.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ECPG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 797.77M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while GHLD trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 617.80M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while VEL trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, MAMTF has a market cap of 532.95M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while MAMTF trades at $13.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas MAMTF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAMTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to MAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, BRLGF has a market cap of 453.49M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while BRLGF trades at $5.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas BRLGF's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRLGF's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while ATAX trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, TBCRF has a market cap of 414.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while TBCRF trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas TBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TBCRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to TBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, AMIVF has a market cap of 367.40M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while AMIVF trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas AMIVF's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMIVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to AMIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 356.19M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while LDI trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.95M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while HMPT trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FCMGF has a market cap of 300.49M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FCMGF trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FCMGF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCMGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to FCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 299.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while ONIT trades at $37.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 276.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while GHI trades at $11.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 251.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while SNFCA trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 215.64M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while BETR trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BETR's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.87M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while OCN trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, CFSU has a market cap of 94.95M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while CFSU trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas CFSU's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CFSU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to CFSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 74.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while IOR trades at $18.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, TFCCF has a market cap of 29.79M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while TFCCF trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas TFCCF's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to TFCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, DVLN has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while DVLN trades at $4,500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas DVLN's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DVLN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to DVLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, YBRHF has a market cap of 13.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while YBRHF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas YBRHF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YBRHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to YBRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, TNSGF has a market cap of 10.03M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while TNSGF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas TNSGF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TNSGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to TNSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while IMH trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMH's ROE of +47.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, VRTB has a market cap of 7.26M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while VRTB trades at $3,105.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas VRTB's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VRTB's ROE of -4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to VRTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, LFLS has a market cap of 3.60M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while LFLS trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas LFLS's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LFLS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to LFLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while CNF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 1.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while BETRW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while PAPL trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, IMPM has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while IMPM trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas IMPM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMPM's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IMPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, VAYK has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while VAYK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas VAYK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VAYK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to VAYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, FCRM has a market cap of 1.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while FCRM trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas FCRM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCRM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to FCRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, STXMF has a market cap of 330922.00. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while STXMF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas STXMF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STXMF's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to STXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, RFNS has a market cap of 12510.00. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while RFNS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas RFNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RFNS's ROE of +5.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to RFNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, NFSE has a market cap of 3188.00. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while NFSE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas NFSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NFSE's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to NFSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, SOHI has a market cap of 1062.00. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while SOHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas SOHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to SOHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, DOMR has a market cap of 785.00. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while DOMR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas DOMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DOMR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to DOMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.

RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 23.85B. In comparison, TWAC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $11.93, while TWAC trades at $140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 56.79, whereas TWAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TWAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to TWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.