Rocket Companies, Inc.
Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKT | $14.95 | -4.53% | 42.2B | -498.33 | -$0.03 | +5.33% |
| COOP | $210.79 | -2.77% | 13.5B | 23.63 | $8.92 | +0.95% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| UWMC | $3.86 | -4.22% | 5.8B | 32.13 | $0.12 | +10.27% |
| PFSI | $86.20 | -2.63% | 4.5B | 9.27 | $9.30 | +1.39% |
| ADAMH | $25.69 | -0.04% | 2.3B | N/A | N/A | +10.73% |
| ADAMM | $25.45 | -0.04% | 2.3B | N/A | N/A | +10.73% |
| ADAMI | $8.57 | -66.17% | 2.3B | N/A | N/A | +10.73% |
| ADAMG | $25.29 | +0.12% | 2.3B | N/A | N/A | +10.73% |
| ADAMN | $22.72 | -0.44% | 2.1B | N/A | N/A | +10.73% |
Stock Comparison
RKT vs COOP Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while COOP trades at $210.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check COOP's competition here
RKT vs MMAC Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check MMAC's competition here
RKT vs UWMC Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while UWMC trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC's competition here
RKT vs PFSI Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while PFSI trades at $86.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PFSI's competition here
RKT vs ADAMH Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, ADAMH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while ADAMH trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas ADAMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADAMH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMH's competition here
RKT vs ADAMM Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, ADAMM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while ADAMM trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas ADAMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADAMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMM's competition here
RKT vs ADAMI Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, ADAMI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while ADAMI trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas ADAMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADAMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMI's competition here
RKT vs ADAMG Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while ADAMG trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMG's competition here
RKT vs ADAMN Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, ADAMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while ADAMN trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas ADAMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADAMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMN's competition here
RKT vs ADAMZ Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while ADAMZ trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMZ's competition here
RKT vs WD Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while WD trades at $48.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check WD's competition here
RKT vs ECPG Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while ECPG trades at $70.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ECPG's competition here
RKT vs GHLD Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while GHLD trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHLD's competition here
RKT vs VEL Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 701M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while VEL trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check VEL's competition here
RKT vs LDI Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while LDI trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check LDI's competition here
RKT vs BETR Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 483.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while BETR trades at $31.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BETR's ROE of +22.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETR's competition here
RKT vs UWMC-WT Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC-WT's competition here
RKT vs ATAX Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATAX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ATAX's competition here
RKT vs ONIT Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 335.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while ONIT trades at $39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ONIT's competition here
RKT vs HMPT Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check HMPT's competition here
RKT vs SNFCA Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while SNFCA trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check SNFCA's competition here
RKT vs OCN Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check OCN's competition here
RKT vs GHI Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 180.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while GHI trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 45.12. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GHI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHI's competition here
RKT vs IOR Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while IOR trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IOR's competition here
RKT vs TRBF Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, TRBF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while TRBF trades at $50.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas TRBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TRBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to TRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check TRBF's competition here
RKT vs CNF Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while CNF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check CNF's competition here
RKT vs IMH Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IMH's competition here
RKT vs BETRW Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while BETRW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BETRW's ROE of +22.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETRW's competition here
RKT vs PAPL Comparison March 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 42.2B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 915.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.95, while PAPL trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -498.33, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PAPL's ROE of +12.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PAPL's competition here