Rocket Companies, Inc.
Rocket Companies, Inc. RKT Peers
See (RKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKT | $14.18 | +0.00% | 29B | 724.25 | $0.02 | +5.48% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| COOP | $149.21 | +0.00% | 9.7B | 16.97 | $8.97 | N/A |
| UWMC-WT | $0.07 | +0.00% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +9.36% |
| UWMC | $4.14 | -0.12% | 5.4B | -53.75 | -$0.08 | +9.36% |
| PFSI | $99.64 | +0.00% | 5.2B | 15.56 | $6.52 | +1.18% |
| WD | $70.48 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 24.78 | $2.92 | +3.63% |
| GHLD | $19.77 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 27.87 | $0.71 | +2.53% |
| ECPG | $38.71 | +0.00% | 933M | -8.24 | -$4.85 | N/A |
| VEL | $18.54 | +0.00% | 683.4M | 9.70 | $1.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RKT vs MMAC Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs COOP Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while COOP trades at $149.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs UWMC-WT Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs UWMC Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while UWMC trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is -53.75. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs PFSI Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while PFSI trades at $99.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs WD Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while WD trades at $70.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs GHLD Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while GHLD trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs ECPG Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 933M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while ECPG trades at $38.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECPG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs VEL Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 683.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while VEL trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs LDI Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 425.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while LDI trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs ATAX Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs HMPT Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs ONIT Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 307.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while ONIT trades at $38.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs GHI Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while GHI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs SNFCA Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 252.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while SNFCA trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs OCN Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs BETR Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 189.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while BETR trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BETR's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs BETRW Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 185.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while BETRW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs IOR Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while IOR trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs IMH Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMH's ROE of +47.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs CNF Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while CNF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.
RKT vs PAPL Comparison
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 29B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 828.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.18, while PAPL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of 724.25, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.