Ribbon Communications Inc.
Ribbon Communications Inc. RBBN Peers
See (RBBN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBBN | $3.39 | -3.29% | 597.6M | -12.09 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| TMUS | $242.20 | +1.21% | 275B | 23.82 | $10.17 | +1.28% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $27.77 | +1.41% | 199.8B | 17.03 | $1.63 | +4.06% |
| TBB | $22.10 | +0.86% | 199.6B | 4.32 | $5.12 | +6.11% |
| VZ | $43.92 | +1.36% | 185.2B | 10.46 | $4.20 | +6.24% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.22% |
| T-PA | $19.95 | +0.25% | 143.6B | 8.39 | $2.38 | +4.06% |
| T-PC | $19.02 | +0.85% | 136.9B | 8.00 | $2.38 | +4.06% |
| CMCSA | $34.54 | +0.76% | 128.6B | 8.51 | $4.06 | +3.68% |
Stock Comparison
RBBN vs TMUS Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 275B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TMUS trades at $242.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs VZA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs T Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, T has a market cap of 199.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while T trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas T's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TBB Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 199.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TBB trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs VZ Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while VZ trades at $43.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TBC Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs T-PA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 143.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while T-PA trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs T-PC Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while T-PC trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CMCSA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 128.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CMCSA trades at $34.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs AMOV Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CHTR Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CHTR trades at $396.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs AMX Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while AMX trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CHT Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CHT trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TEF Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TEF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -53.10. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs ORAN Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs VOD Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while VOD trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TU Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TU trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs BCE Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while BCE trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 72.60. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TLK Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TLK trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs VIV Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while VIV trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs SJR Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs RCI Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while RCI trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LBRDP Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LBRDP trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LBRDK Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LBRDK trades at $93.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LBRDA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LBRDA trades at $92.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs MBT Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs KT Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while KT trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs FYBR Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while FYBR trades at $36.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TIMB Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TIMB trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CTDD Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CTDD trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs SKM Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while SKM trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TIGO Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TIGO trades at $37.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs UZD Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while UZD trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs UZE Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while UZE trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TKC Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TKC trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs USM Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while USM trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -137.56. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs UZF Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while UZF trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs PHI Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while PHI trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LBYKV Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CTBB Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CTBB trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LUMN Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LUMN trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TDS-PV Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TDS-PV trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TDS-PU Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TDS-PU trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TDS Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TDS trades at $34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -33.34. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs SNRE Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while SNRE trades at $51.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LBTYB Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LBTYB trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LBTYK Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LBTYK trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LBTYA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LBTYA trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs DISH Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TEO Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TEO trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 89.45. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs IRDM Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while IRDM trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs GSAT Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while GSAT trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -29.76. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CCOI Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CCOI trades at $45.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -11.46. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs IHS Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while IHS trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -42.65. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs ASTSW Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs IDT Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while IDT trades at $61.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs RADI Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs GOGO Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while GOGO trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -265.25. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs ATUS Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while ATUS trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LILA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LILA trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LILAK Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 996.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LILAK trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CABO Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 822.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CABO trades at $146.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -40.40. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs SHEN Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 690.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while SHEN trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -17.97. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CNSL Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs ATEX Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while ATEX trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -16.41. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs OOMA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 375.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while OOMA trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -71.79. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs WOW Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 360.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while WOW trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs HCHC Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs ATNI Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 216.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while ATNI trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs RDCM Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while RDCM trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TV Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TV trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs FNGR Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while FNGR trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -33.56. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CXDO Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CXDO trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 67.44. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs VEON Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while VEON trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs MTSL Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs SIFY Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while SIFY trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -38.62. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TDI Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TDI trades at $32.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs KORE Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while KORE trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs PCLA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while PCLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs ANTE Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while ANTE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs MIMO Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs UCL Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while UCL trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -8.35. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs QTEK Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs QTEKW Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs COMSP Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs COMSW Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs PTNR Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs ALSK Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TDA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs GTT Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs UZA Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs OIBR-C Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs STRY Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LORL Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs CBB Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs MIMO-WT Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs LBYAV Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.
RBBN vs TIGOR Comparison
RBBN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBBN stands at 597.6M. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBBN is priced at $3.39, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBBN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.09, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBBN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBBN is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBBN.