QualTek Services Inc.
QualTek Services Inc. QTEKW Peers
See (QTEKW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTEKW | $0.00 | -36.17% | 4.9M | -0.00 | -$42.13 | N/A |
| TMUS | $238.26 | +1.28% | 270.5B | 23.29 | $10.23 | +1.39% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $28.94 | +3.06% | 208.2B | 17.75 | $1.63 | +3.87% |
| TBB | $22.20 | -0.67% | 196.6B | 4.33 | $5.12 | +6.01% |
| VZ | $43.27 | +2.27% | 182.4B | 10.30 | $4.20 | +6.29% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| T-PA | $20.15 | +0.80% | 144.6B | 8.46 | $2.38 | +3.87% |
| T-PC | $19.10 | +0.79% | 136.7B | 7.99 | $2.38 | +3.87% |
| CMCSA | $35.69 | +1.05% | 132.9B | 8.79 | $4.06 | +3.55% |
Stock Comparison
QTEKW vs TMUS Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 270.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TMUS trades at $238.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs VZA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs T Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, T has a market cap of 208.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while T trades at $28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas T's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TBB Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 196.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TBB trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs VZ Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 182.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while VZ trades at $43.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TBC Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs T-PA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 144.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while T-PA trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs T-PC Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while T-PC trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CMCSA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CMCSA trades at $35.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs AMOV Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CHTR Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CHTR trades at $408.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs AMX Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while AMX trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CHT Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CHT trades at $46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs ORAN Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TEF Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TEF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -52.30. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs VOD Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while VOD trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TU Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TU trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs BCE Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while BCE trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 71.52. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs VIV Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while VIV trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TLK Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TLK trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs RCI Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while RCI trades at $29.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs SJR Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LBRDA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LBRDA trades at $97.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LBRDK Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LBRDK trades at $98.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LBRDP Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LBRDP trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs KT Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while KT trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TIMB Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TIMB trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs MBT Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs FYBR Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while FYBR trades at $36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs SKM Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while SKM trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CTDD Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CTDD trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TIGO Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TIGO trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs USM Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while USM trades at $63.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs UZD Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while UZD trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs UZF Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while UZF trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TKC Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TKC trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs UZE Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while UZE trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs PHI Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while PHI trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LUMN Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LUMN trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LBYKV Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CTBB Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CTBB trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs SNRE Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while SNRE trades at $56.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TDS Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TDS trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -33.89. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TDS-PV Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TDS-PV trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TDS-PU Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TDS-PU trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LBTYA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LBTYA trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -16.15. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LBTYK Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LBTYK trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.63. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LBTYB Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LBTYB trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.61. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs IRDM Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while IRDM trades at $30.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs VEON Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while VEON trades at $46.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs DISH Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs GSAT Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while GSAT trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -37.98. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TEO Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TEO trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 87.90. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CCOI Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CCOI trades at $48.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs GOGO Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while GOGO trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -367.00. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs IHS Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while IHS trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -42.81. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to IHS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs ASTSW Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs IDT Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while IDT trades at $68.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs RADI Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LILA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LILA trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LILAK Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LILAK trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs ATUS Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 993.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while ATUS trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CABO Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CABO trades at $135.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -37.65. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs SHEN Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 749.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while SHEN trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs RBBN Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 707.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while RBBN trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -14.32. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CNSL Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs ATEX Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 479.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while ATEX trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -42.05. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs OOMA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 356.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while OOMA trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -67.92. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs WOW Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 347M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while WOW trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs HCHC Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs ATNI Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 247.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while ATNI trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TV Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 236.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TV trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs RDCM Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while RDCM trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CXDO Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 176.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CXDO trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 75.88. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs FNGR Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while FNGR trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -22.56. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs MTSL Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TDI Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TDI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs SIFY Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while SIFY trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs KORE Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while KORE trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs PCLA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while PCLA trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs IQST Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while IQST trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs ANTE Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while ANTE trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs MIMO Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs UCL Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while UCL trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -9.66. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs QTEK Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs COMSP Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs COMSW Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs GTT Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs MIMO-WT Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs ALSK Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TDA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LBYAV Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs OIBR-C Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs PTNR Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs STRY Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs LORL Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs UZA Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs CBB Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.
QTEKW vs TIGOR Comparison
QTEKW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTEKW stands at 4.9M. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTEKW is priced at $0.00, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTEKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTEKW's ROE is +2.56%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTEKW is more volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTEKW.