PETRONAS Dagangan Berhad
PETRONAS Dagangan Berhad (PNADF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PNADF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNADF | $4.48 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 37.33 | $0.12 | +11.94% |
| JXHLY | $9.85 | -3.48% | 14.4B | 213.50 | $0.05 | +2.42% |
| JXHGF | $5.27 | +0.00% | 14.2B | 175.73 | $0.03 | +3.09% |
| NTOIY | $8.32 | +6.14% | 12.6B | -58.46 | -$0.14 | +5.36% |
| NTOIF | $16.08 | +2.62% | 12.4B | -57.43 | -$0.28 | +5.50% |
| KLYCY | $10.07 | +0.00% | 8.7B | 10.49 | $0.96 | +4.28% |
| KUNUF | $0.99 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 9.90 | $0.10 | +4.38% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| IDKOF | $6.35 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 11.98 | $0.53 | +0.03% |
| IDKOY | $12.30 | -6.39% | 7.5B | 11.83 | $1.04 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
PNADF vs JXHLY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while JXHLY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 213.50. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check JXHLY's competition here
PNADF vs JXHGF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while JXHGF trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 175.73. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to JXHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check JXHGF's competition here
PNADF vs NTOIY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while NTOIY trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -58.46. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check NTOIY's competition here
PNADF vs NTOIF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while NTOIF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is -57.43. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTOIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check NTOIF's competition here
PNADF vs KLYCY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while KLYCY trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to KLYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check KLYCY's competition here
PNADF vs KUNUF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while KUNUF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check KUNUF's competition here
PNADF vs SAAFY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check SAAFY's competition here
PNADF vs IDKOF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while IDKOF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check IDKOF's competition here
PNADF vs IDKOY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while IDKOY trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and IDKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDKOY's competition here
PNADF vs DCCPY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while DCCPY trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check DCCPY's competition here
PNADF vs DCCPF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while DCCPF trades at $62.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check DCCPF's competition here
PNADF vs MOHCY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while MOHCY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check MOHCY's competition here
PNADF vs PKIUF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while PKIUF trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and PKIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKIUF's competition here
PNADF vs SHIIY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check SHIIY's competition here
PNADF vs CTXAY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while CTXAY trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and CTXAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTXAY's competition here
PNADF vs CTXAF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check CTXAF's competition here
PNADF vs RBSFY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while RBSFY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check RBSFY's competition here
PNADF vs RUBSF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while RUBSF trades at $32.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check RUBSF's competition here
PNADF vs MOHCF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check MOHCF's competition here
PNADF vs TOIPF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while TOIPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check TOIPF's competition here
PNADF vs TOIPY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while TOIPY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to TOIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check TOIPY's competition here
PNADF vs PKCPY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while PKCPY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to PKCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check PKCPY's competition here
PNADF vs FJLLF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and FJLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FJLLF's competition here
PNADF vs OILRF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 808.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while OILRF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and OILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OILRF's competition here
PNADF vs TPHIF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and TPHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPHIF's competition here
PNADF vs IRPSY Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 510.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while IRPSY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check IRPSY's competition here
PNADF vs CAOLF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 474M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and CAOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOLF's competition here
PNADF vs NZRFF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while NZRFF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check NZRFF's competition here
PNADF vs FGPRB Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while FGPRB trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check FGPRB's competition here
PNADF vs REGX Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and REGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REGX's competition here
PNADF vs CLSZF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while CLSZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and CLSZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLSZF's competition here
PNADF vs FGPR Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while FGPR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGPR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and FGPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGPR's competition here
PNADF vs BDCO Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while BDCO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check BDCO's competition here
PNADF vs ISRJF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while ISRJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to ISRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check ISRJF's competition here
PNADF vs QREE Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while QREE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check QREE's competition here
PNADF vs LCNTU Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while LCNTU trades at $460.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to LCNTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check LCNTU's competition here
PNADF vs SRNW Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while SRNW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and SRNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRNW's competition here
PNADF vs WTLC Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and WTLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTLC's competition here
PNADF vs BERI Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 146.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while BERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check BERI's competition here
PNADF vs DVFI Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and DVFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVFI's competition here
PNADF vs IAHL Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and IAHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAHL's competition here
PNADF vs ABLE Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNADF.Check ABLE's competition here
PNADF vs LNKE Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and LNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNKE's competition here
PNADF vs TOAOF Comparison August 2025
PNADF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNADF stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PNADF is priced at $4.48, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNADF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.33, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, PNADF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNADF and TOAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOAOF's competition here