Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PLOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLOW | $42.64 | -0.35% | 981.1M | 24.47 | $1.74 | +2.76% |
| ORLY | $95.35 | +1.98% | 80.5B | 32.10 | $2.97 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,829.27 | +2.15% | 63.7B | 26.67 | $143.57 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| MGA | $63.90 | -1.57% | 18B | 21.81 | $2.93 | +2.96% |
| APTV | $76.87 | -3.39% | 16.6B | 102.49 | $0.75 | N/A |
| BWA | $58.17 | -1.27% | 12.4B | 45.42 | $1.28 | +0.95% |
| MOD | $222.50 | -1.71% | 11.8B | 121.80 | $1.83 | N/A |
| ALSN | $116.84 | -1.69% | 9.7B | 14.34 | $8.15 | +0.91% |
| ALV | $121.75 | -1.07% | 9.2B | 12.74 | $9.55 | +2.52% |
Stock Comparison
PLOW vs ORLY Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while ORLY trades at $95.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check ORLY's competition here
PLOW vs AZO Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while AZO trades at $3,829.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check AZO's competition here
PLOW vs APTV-PA Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check APTV-PA's competition here
PLOW vs MGA Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while MGA trades at $63.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check MGA's competition here
PLOW vs APTV Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while APTV trades at $76.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 102.49. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check APTV's competition here
PLOW vs BWA Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while BWA trades at $58.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 45.42. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check BWA's competition here
PLOW vs MOD Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while MOD trades at $222.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 121.80. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check MOD's competition here
PLOW vs ALSN Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while ALSN trades at $116.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check ALSN's competition here
PLOW vs ALV Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while ALV trades at $121.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check ALV's competition here
PLOW vs LKQ Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while LKQ trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check LKQ's competition here
PLOW vs MBLY Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while MBLY trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check MBLY's competition here
PLOW vs LEA Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while LEA trades at $132.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check LEA's competition here
PLOW vs GNTX Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while GNTX trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check GNTX's competition here
PLOW vs DAN Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while DAN trades at $34.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is 79.18. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check DAN's competition here
PLOW vs BC-PA Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while BC-PA trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check BC-PA's competition here
PLOW vs TMH Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, TMH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while TMH trades at $63.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas TMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to TMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check TMH's competition here
PLOW vs QS Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while QS trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -9.01. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check QS's competition here
PLOW vs DORM Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while DORM trades at $127.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check DORM's competition here
PLOW vs GTX Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while GTX trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check GTX's competition here
PLOW vs BC-PB Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check BC-PB's competition here
PLOW vs HSAI Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while HSAI trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is 58.60. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSAI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check HSAI's competition here
PLOW vs PHIN Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while PHIN trades at $76.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check PHIN's competition here
PLOW vs VC Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while VC trades at $95.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check VC's competition here
PLOW vs GT Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while GT trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GT's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check GT's competition here
PLOW vs ADNT Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while ADNT trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check ADNT's competition here
PLOW vs XPEL Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while XPEL trades at $49.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check XPEL's competition here
PLOW vs AXL Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while AXL trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check AXL's competition here
PLOW vs THRM Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while THRM trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check THRM's competition here
PLOW vs SMP Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 961.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while SMP trades at $43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check SMP's competition here
PLOW vs FOXF Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 795.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while FOXF trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check FOXF's competition here
PLOW vs AEVA Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 748.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while AEVA trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -7.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check AEVA's competition here
PLOW vs CPS Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while CPS trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -171.65. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check CPS's competition here
PLOW vs MNRO Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 680.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while MNRO trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -47.25. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check MNRO's competition here
PLOW vs SES Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 579.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while SES trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check SES's competition here
PLOW vs GTXAP Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check GTXAP's competition here
PLOW vs ECX Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 549.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while ECX trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check ECX's competition here
PLOW vs HLLY Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while HLLY trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check HLLY's competition here
PLOW vs ALLG Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check ALLG's competition here
PLOW vs MLR Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 478.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while MLR trades at $41.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check MLR's competition here
PLOW vs STRT Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while STRT trades at $87.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check STRT's competition here
PLOW vs HYLN Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while HYLN trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check HYLN's competition here
PLOW vs SRI Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while SRI trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check SRI's competition here
PLOW vs MPAA Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while MPAA trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is 117.56. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MPAA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check MPAA's competition here
PLOW vs INVZ Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while INVZ trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check INVZ's competition here
PLOW vs XL Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check XL's competition here
PLOW vs CAAS Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 133.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while CAAS trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check CAAS's competition here
PLOW vs KNDI Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while KNDI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check KNDI's competition here
PLOW vs LIDR Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while LIDR trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check LIDR's competition here
PLOW vs SYPR Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 70.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while SYPR trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -27.82. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check SYPR's competition here
PLOW vs CVGI Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while CVGI trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check CVGI's competition here
PLOW vs GGR Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while GGR trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check GGR's competition here
PLOW vs WPRT Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while WPRT trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check WPRT's competition here
PLOW vs AIIO Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, AIIO has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while AIIO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas AIIO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIIO's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to AIIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check AIIO's competition here
PLOW vs NCNCW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check NCNCW's competition here
PLOW vs NCNC Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check NCNC's competition here
PLOW vs AMV Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMV's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check AMV's competition here
PLOW vs HLLY-WT Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
PLOW vs ECXWW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check ECXWW's competition here
PLOW vs FRSX Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while FRSX trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check FRSX's competition here
PLOW vs MKDW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while MKDW trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check MKDW's competition here
PLOW vs SAG Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check SAG's competition here
PLOW vs SUP Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUP's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check SUP's competition here
PLOW vs WKSP Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while WKSP trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check WKSP's competition here
PLOW vs INEO Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while INEO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check INEO's competition here
PLOW vs LIDRW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check LIDRW's competition here
PLOW vs UFAB Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check UFAB's competition here
PLOW vs INVZW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while INVZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check INVZW's competition here
PLOW vs MKDWW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check MKDWW's competition here
PLOW vs CREV Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 775.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while CREV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check CREV's competition here
PLOW vs WKSPW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check WKSPW's competition here
PLOW vs GGROW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 115.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check GGROW's competition here
PLOW vs HYZNW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check HYZNW's competition here
PLOW vs CREVW Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while CREVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CREVW's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check CREVW's competition here
PLOW vs VNE Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check VNE's competition here
PLOW vs MTOR Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check MTOR's competition here
PLOW vs HZN Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check HZN's competition here
PLOW vs RMO Comparison February 2026
PLOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLOW stands at 981.1M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLOW is priced at $42.64, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, PLOW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLOW is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLOW.Check RMO's competition here