PLDT Inc.
PLDT Inc. (PHI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PHI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | $23.05 | +1.81% | 5B | 8.91 | $2.58 | +7.47% |
| TMUS | $251.95 | -2.41% | 283.5B | 23.81 | $10.58 | +1.31% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $28.77 | -2.28% | 205.5B | 16.43 | $1.75 | +3.86% |
| TBB | $23.36 | +0.60% | 205.5B | 4.56 | $5.12 | +5.72% |
| VZ | $44.44 | -1.31% | 187.3B | 10.33 | $4.30 | +6.11% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.82% |
| T-PA | $20.90 | +1.65% | 149.6B | 8.80 | $2.38 | +3.86% |
| T-PC | $19.98 | +1.16% | 142.9B | 8.41 | $2.38 | +3.86% |
| CMCSA | $34.15 | +1.64% | 125.8B | 5.66 | $6.03 | +3.78% |
Stock Comparison
PHI vs TMUS Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 283.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TMUS trades at $251.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TMUS's competition here
PHI vs VZA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check VZA's competition here
PHI vs T Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while T trades at $28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check T's competition here
PHI vs TBB Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TBB trades at $23.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TBB's competition here
PHI vs VZ Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 187.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while VZ trades at $44.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check VZ's competition here
PHI vs TBC Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TBC's competition here
PHI vs T-PA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 149.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while T-PA trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check T-PA's competition here
PHI vs T-PC Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while T-PC trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check T-PC's competition here
PHI vs CMCSA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CMCSA trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CMCSA's competition here
PHI vs AMOV Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check AMOV's competition here
PHI vs AMX Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while AMX trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check AMX's competition here
PHI vs CHTR Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CHTR trades at $277.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CHTR's competition here
PHI vs CHT Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CHT trades at $44.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CHT's competition here
PHI vs TEF Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TEF trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TEF's competition here
PHI vs VOD Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while VOD trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check VOD's competition here
PHI vs ORAN Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check ORAN's competition here
PHI vs TU Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TU trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TU's competition here
PHI vs BCE Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while BCE trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 77.23. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check BCE's competition here
PHI vs VIV Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while VIV trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check VIV's competition here
PHI vs TLK Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TLK trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TLK's competition here
PHI vs RCI Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while RCI trades at $35.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check RCI's competition here
PHI vs SJR Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check SJR's competition here
PHI vs TIMB Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TIMB trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TIMB's competition here
PHI vs KT Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while KT trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check KT's competition here
PHI vs MBT Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MBT's ROE of -4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check MBT's competition here
PHI vs FYBR Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while FYBR trades at $36.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.68. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check FYBR's competition here
PHI vs LBRDK Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LBRDK trades at $63.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LBRDK's competition here
PHI vs LBRDA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LBRDA trades at $63.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LBRDA's competition here
PHI vs CTDD Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CTDD trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CTDD's competition here
PHI vs LBRDP Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LBRDP trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LBRDP's competition here
PHI vs SKM Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while SKM trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check SKM's competition here
PHI vs TIGO Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TIGO trades at $47.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TIGO's competition here
PHI vs USM Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while USM trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check USM's competition here
PHI vs UZE Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while UZE trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check UZE's competition here
PHI vs UZF Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while UZF trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check UZF's competition here
PHI vs UZD Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while UZD trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check UZD's competition here
PHI vs TKC Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TKC trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TKC's competition here
PHI vs LUMN Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LUMN trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -9.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LUMN's competition here
PHI vs LBYKV Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LBYKV's competition here
PHI vs TDS Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TDS trades at $38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -40.12. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TDS's competition here
PHI vs TDS-PU Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TDS-PU trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TDS-PU's competition here
PHI vs CTBB Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CTBB trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -9.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CTBB's competition here
PHI vs TDS-PV Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TDS-PV trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TDS-PV's competition here
PHI vs VEON Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while VEON trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check VEON's competition here
PHI vs LBTYK Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LBTYK trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LBTYK's competition here
PHI vs SNRE Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while SNRE trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check SNRE's competition here
PHI vs LBTYA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LBTYA trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LBTYA's competition here
PHI vs TEO Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TEO trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is -19.93. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TEO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TEO's competition here
PHI vs LBTYB Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LBTYB trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LBTYB's competition here
PHI vs GSAT Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while GSAT trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -66.75. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check GSAT's competition here
PHI vs DISH Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check DISH's competition here
PHI vs IRDM Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while IRDM trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check IRDM's competition here
PHI vs IHS Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while IHS trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IHS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check IHS's competition here
PHI vs CCOI Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CCOI trades at $38.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CCOI's competition here
PHI vs ASTSW Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check ASTSW's competition here
PHI vs LILAK Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LILAK trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LILAK's competition here
PHI vs IDT Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while IDT trades at $63.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check IDT's competition here
PHI vs LILA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LILA trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LILA's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LILA's competition here
PHI vs GOGO Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while GOGO trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 289.00. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GOGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check GOGO's competition here
PHI vs RADI Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check RADI's competition here
PHI vs TV Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TV trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TV's competition here
PHI vs ATUS Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while ATUS trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check ATUS's competition here
PHI vs CABO Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 920.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CABO trades at $163.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CABO's competition here
PHI vs SHEN Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 723.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while SHEN trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -20.28. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check SHEN's competition here
PHI vs RBBN Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 703M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while RBBN trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -15.88. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check RBBN's competition here
PHI vs SIFY Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 613.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while SIFY trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check SIFY's competition here
PHI vs CNSL Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CNSL's competition here
PHI vs WOW Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 435.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while WOW trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check WOW's competition here
PHI vs ATEX Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 420.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while ATEX trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check ATEX's competition here
PHI vs OOMA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 333.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while OOMA trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -63.53. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check OOMA's competition here
PHI vs HCHC Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check HCHC's competition here
PHI vs ATNI Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while ATNI trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check ATNI's competition here
PHI vs RDCM Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 217.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while RDCM trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check RDCM's competition here
PHI vs CXDO Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CXDO trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CXDO's competition here
PHI vs FNGR Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 96.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while FNGR trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check FNGR's competition here
PHI vs MTSL Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check MTSL's competition here
PHI vs TDI Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TDI trades at $36.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TDI's competition here
PHI vs KORE Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while KORE trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check KORE's competition here
PHI vs ANTE Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while ANTE trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check ANTE's competition here
PHI vs IQST Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while IQST trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check IQST's competition here
PHI vs UCL Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while UCL trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -18.20. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check UCL's competition here
PHI vs PCLA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while PCLA trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check PCLA's competition here
PHI vs MIMO Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check MIMO's competition here
PHI vs QTEKW Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check QTEKW's competition here
PHI vs QTEK Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check QTEK's competition here
PHI vs COMSP Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check COMSP's competition here
PHI vs COMSW Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 270. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check COMSW's competition here
PHI vs TIGOR Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TIGOR's competition here
PHI vs CBB Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check CBB's competition here
PHI vs LBYAV Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LBYAV's competition here
PHI vs TDA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check TDA's competition here
PHI vs STRY Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check STRY's competition here
PHI vs PTNR Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check PTNR's competition here
PHI vs ALSK Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check ALSK's competition here
PHI vs UZA Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check UZA's competition here
PHI vs GTT Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check GTT's competition here
PHI vs MIMO-WT Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check MIMO-WT's competition here
PHI vs OIBR-C Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check OIBR-C's competition here
PHI vs LORL Comparison August 2025
PHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHI stands at 5B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHI is priced at $23.05, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHI currently has a P/E ratio of 8.91, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHI's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHI is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHI.Check LORL's competition here