The Procter & Gamble Company
The Procter & Gamble Company PG Peers
See (PG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG | $169.85 | +0.76% | 398.2B | 27.00 | $6.29 | +2.39% |
| UL | $63.83 | +0.41% | 159.4B | 24.46 | $2.61 | +3.04% |
| CL | $92.99 | +0.75% | 75.4B | 26.34 | $3.53 | +2.16% |
| KMB | $143.76 | -0.06% | 47.7B | 19.61 | $7.33 | +3.41% |
| KVUE | $23.86 | +1.17% | 45.8B | 42.60 | $0.56 | +3.45% |
| CHD | $98.32 | +0.18% | 24.2B | 42.02 | $2.34 | +1.17% |
| EL | $66.93 | -2.53% | 24.1B | -26.67 | -$2.51 | +3.51% |
| CLX | $131.85 | +0.66% | 16.3B | 23.67 | $5.57 | +3.71% |
| SGI | $65.08 | -0.38% | 13.6B | 42.26 | $1.54 | +0.46% |
| HIMS | $56.59 | +8.00% | 12.2B | 84.46 | $0.67 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PG vs UL Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 159.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while UL trades at $63.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs CL Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while CL trades at $92.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CL's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs KMB Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while KMB trades at $143.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs KVUE Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while KVUE trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 42.60. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs CHD Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while CHD trades at $98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 42.02. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs EL Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while EL trades at $66.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs CLX Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while CLX trades at $131.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs SGI Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while SGI trades at $65.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 42.26. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs HIMS Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while HIMS trades at $56.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs ELF Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while ELF trades at $112.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 58.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs NTCO Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs IPAR Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while IPAR trades at $136.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs COTY Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while COTY trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs NWL Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while NWL trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -8.98. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs SPB Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while SPB trades at $57.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs EPC Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while EPC trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs HELE Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 616.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while HELE trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HELE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs NUS Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 426.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while NUS trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs PHH Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while PHH trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 705.50. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs SLSN Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 270.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while SLSN trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 77.20. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs EWCZ Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 220.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while EWCZ trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs SKIN Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while SKIN trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs ACU Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 149.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while ACU trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs GROV Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while GROV trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs RAY Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while RAY trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 43.83. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs UG Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while UG trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs MTEX Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while MTEX trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -90.82. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs BRSH Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs DSY Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while DSY trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs TANH Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while TANH trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs TKLF Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while TKLF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs BRSHW Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs REV Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.
PG vs SUMR Comparison
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 398.2B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $169.85, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.