The Procter & Gamble Company

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 160.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while UL trades at $72.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check UL's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while CL trades at $93.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 36.15. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CL's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while EL trades at $111.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -228.42. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EL's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while KMB trades at $108.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check KMB's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while KVUE trades at $18.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check KVUE's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while CHD trades at $103.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 34.14. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CHD's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while SGI trades at $89.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 58.07. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SGI's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while CLX trades at $122.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CLX's ROE of +15.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CLX's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while ELF trades at $91.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 53.10. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check ELF's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while NTCO trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NTCO's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while IPAR trades at $101.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check IPAR's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while COTY trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check COTY's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while NWL trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NWL's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while SPB trades at $78.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SPB's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while EPC trades at $22.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 206.73. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EPC's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 427.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while HELE trades at $18.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check HELE's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while NUS trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NUS's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while EWCZ trades at $5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EWCZ's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while PTNM trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check PTNM's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while ACU trades at $43.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check ACU's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 119.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while SKIN trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SKIN's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while SLSN trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 127.00. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SLSN's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while GROV trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check GROV's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while AXIL trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check AXIL's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while UG trades at $6.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check UG's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while MTEX trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check MTEX's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while RAY trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check RAY's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while DSY trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check DSY's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while PHH trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check PHH's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while BRSH trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check BRSH's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while TANH trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check TANH's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while TKLF trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check TKLF's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check BRSHW's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while SUMR trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SUMR's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 375.7B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $158.56, while REV trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.82, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check REV's competition here