The Procter & Gamble Company

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while UL trades at $61.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check UL's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while CL trades at $84.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CL's ROE of +6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CL's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while KMB trades at $133.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check KMB's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while KVUE trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check KVUE's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while EL trades at $91.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -39.36. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EL's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while CHD trades at $92.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 44.19. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CHD's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while SGI trades at $78.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 55.46. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SGI's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while CLX trades at $122.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CLX's ROE of +8.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CLX's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while HIMS trades at $47.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 61.16. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check HIMS's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while ELF trades at $116.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 72.72. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check ELF's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while NTCO trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NTCO's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while COTY trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check COTY's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while IPAR trades at $116.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check IPAR's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while NWL trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NWL's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while SPB trades at $57.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SPB's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while EPC trades at $22.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EPC's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 571.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while NUS trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NUS's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 553.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while HELE trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check HELE's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while SKIN trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SKIN's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while SLSN trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 45.75. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SLSN's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 217.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while EWCZ trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EWCZ's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 171.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while ACU trades at $43.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check ACU's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while RAY trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 46.67. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check RAY's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while DSY trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 37.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check DSY's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while GROV trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check GROV's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while UG trades at $8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check UG's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while MTEX trades at $8.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -90.83. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check MTEX's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while PHH trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check PHH's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while BRSH trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check BRSH's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while TANH trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check TANH's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while TKLF trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check TKLF's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check BRSHW's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while SUMR trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SUMR's competition here

PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 364.1B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $155.09, while REV trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PG currently has a P/E ratio of 23.88, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check REV's competition here