Pendragon PLC

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while SIEVF trades at $209.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to SIEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check SIEVF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, SIETY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while SIETY trades at $99.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SIETY's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIETY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and SIETY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIETY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while ATOGF trades at $29.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 104.29. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to ATOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check ATOGF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while ZSHGY trades at $17.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and ZSHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZSHGY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while IHCPF trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check IHCPF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while USSJF trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and USSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USSJF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while ZHSHF trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to ZHSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check ZHSHF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while USSJY trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check USSJY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, CYYHF has a market cap of 508.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while CYYHF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CYYHF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYYHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and CYYHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYYHF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMUXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and KMUXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMUXF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 443.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while AOCIF trades at $19.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to AOCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check AOCIF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while CMEIF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and CMEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMEIF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and LKKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LKKRF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while VTMTF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and VTMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMTF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while MVXM trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and MVXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MVXM's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while NWAU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and NWAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWAU's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check MTPTF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, CZASF has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while CZASF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CZASF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZASF's ROE of -15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to CZASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check CZASF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and GBXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBXXY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 228.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while PREC trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check PREC's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while KXINW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check KXINW's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 24.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while RWGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWGI's ROE of -3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and RWGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RWGI's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while SPMI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and SPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPMI's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while MTAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and MTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTAM's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while LASLY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LASLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and LASLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LASLY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check SFTGQ's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 48. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check CALIQ's competition here