Patrick Industries, Inc.
Patrick Industries, Inc. PATK Peers
See (PATK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATK | $90.31 | -0.31% | 3B | 21.71 | $4.16 | +2.16% |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.62% |
| SN | $87.22 | -0.06% | 12.2B | 27.60 | $3.16 | N/A |
| MHK | $101.54 | +0.74% | 6.3B | 13.27 | $7.65 | N/A |
| WHR | $83.12 | +1.29% | 4.6B | 639.38 | $0.13 | +8.41% |
| LZB | $40.25 | -0.15% | 1.7B | 13.83 | $2.91 | +2.14% |
| MBC | $10.41 | +0.77% | 1.3B | 13.52 | $0.77 | N/A |
| LEG | $9.10 | -0.22% | 1.2B | -2.44 | -$3.72 | +2.19% |
| TILE | $20.14 | +0.30% | 1.2B | 13.79 | $1.46 | +0.20% |
| MLKN | $17.07 | -0.29% | 1.2B | 39.70 | $0.43 | +4.43% |
Stock Comparison
PATK vs TPX Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs SN Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while SN trades at $87.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs MHK Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while MHK trades at $101.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs WHR Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while WHR trades at $83.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 639.38. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs LZB Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while LZB trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs MBC Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while MBC trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs LEG Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while LEG trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs TILE Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while TILE trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs MLKN Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while MLKN trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs AMWD Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 807.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while AMWD trades at $54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs ETD Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 665.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while ETD trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs LOVE Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while LOVE trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs HBB Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while HBB trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs SNBR Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while SNBR trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs COOK Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 200.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while COOK trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs FLXS Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while FLXS trades at $30.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs BSET Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 141.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while BSET trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is -21.34. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BSET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs VIRC Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while VIRC trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs IRBT Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while IRBT trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs HOFT Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while HOFT trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs KEQU Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while KEQU trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs VIOT Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while VIOT trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs PRPL Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while PRPL trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs LCUT Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while LCUT trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs NTZ Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while NTZ trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs CRWS Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while CRWS trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs NCL Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while NCL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCL's ROE of -4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs NVFY Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while NVFY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs ATER Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while ATER trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs EFOI Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while EFOI trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs FGI Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while FGI trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs AUVIP Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs AUVI Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs FGIWW Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 396.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs WEBR Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.
PATK vs KBAL Comparison
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3B. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $90.31, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.