OceanPal Inc.
OceanPal Inc. OP Peers
See (OP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP | $2.32 | +44.10% | 17.4M | -0.86 | -$2.71 | N/A |
| KEX | $113.14 | +2.08% | 6.3B | 22.40 | $5.05 | N/A |
| MATX | $111.86 | -0.53% | 3.7B | 7.42 | $15.07 | +1.21% |
| HAFN | $5.42 | -2.17% | 2.7B | 4.63 | $1.17 | +16.85% |
| SB-PC | $25.65 | +0.08% | 2.6B | 17.01 | $1.51 | +5.24% |
| SB-PD | $25.35 | N/A | 2.6B | 16.81 | $1.51 | +5.24% |
| ZIM | $18.03 | +2.97% | 2.2B | 0.92 | $19.52 | +47.27% |
| SBLK | $17.02 | -2.18% | 2B | 8.91 | $1.91 | +8.45% |
| CDLR | $21.94 | +0.60% | 1.9B | 18.28 | $1.20 | N/A |
| CMBT | $9.47 | -0.84% | 1.8B | 4.29 | $2.21 | +12.11% |
Stock Comparison
OP vs KEX Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while KEX trades at $113.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs MATX Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while MATX trades at $111.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs HAFN Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while HAFN trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SB-PC Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SB-PC trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SB-PD Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SB-PD trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs ZIM Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while ZIM trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SBLK Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SBLK trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CDLR Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CDLR trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CDLR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CMBT Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CMBT trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs BWLP Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while BWLP trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs DAC Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while DAC trades at $86.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs GOGL Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while GOGL trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GOGL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SBBA Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SFL Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SFL trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CCEC Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CCEC trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 34.51. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs NMM Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while NMM trades at $40.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CMRE Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CMRE trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CMRE-PC Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CMRE-PC trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CMRE-PB Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CMRE-PB trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CMRE-PD Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CMRE-PD trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CMRE-PE Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CPLP Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs GSL-PB Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 939.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while GSL-PB trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs GSL Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 930.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while GSL trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs ECO Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 735.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while ECO trades at $23.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs GNK Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 592.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while GNK trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs NAT Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while NAT trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs NETI Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs ASC Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 406.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while ASC trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SB Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 392.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SB trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CLCO Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 385.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CLCO trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs ESEA Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 311.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while ESEA trades at $44.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs HSHP Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while HSHP trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs PANL Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 305.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while PANL trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs GRIN Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, GRIN has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while GRIN trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas GRIN's P/E ratio is -28.98. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GRIN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to GRIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CMDB Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 250.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CMDB trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs GASS Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while GASS trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs KNOP Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while KNOP trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs ESEAV Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs DSX-PB Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 194.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while DSX-PB trades at $26.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs DSX Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while DSX trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 32.70. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SMHI Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 165.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SMHI trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SHIP Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SHIP trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs NCT Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while NCT trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs HMR Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while HMR trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HMR's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs UFG Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while UFG trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 245.00. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs NM Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs PXSAP Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs EHLDV Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs TORO Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while TORO trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -55.25. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs NM-PG Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs PXS Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while PXS trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs TOPS Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while TOPS trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs GLBS Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while GLBS trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is 64.01. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GLBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs PSHG Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while PSHG trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs HTCO Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while HTCO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HTCO's ROE of +1067.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs EDRY Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while EDRY trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CACO Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CTRM Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CTRM trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs NM-PH Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs EHLD Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while EHLD trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs USEA Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while USEA trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs EGLE Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, EGLE has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while EGLE trades at $62.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas EGLE's P/E ratio is 54.78. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EGLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to EGLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs ICON Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while ICON trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs CISS Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while CISS trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CISS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs PXSAW Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 325.1K. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while PXSAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SHIPW Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs TOROV Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OP is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SBLKZ Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.
OP vs SHIPZ Comparison
OP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OP stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OP is priced at $2.32, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.86, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OP is more volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OP.