Orosur Mining Inc.
Orosur Mining Inc. (OMI.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OMI.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMI.TO | CA$0.25 | -5.66% | 0 | -20.83 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| AEM.TO | CA$264.48 | +3.09% | 132.5B | 18.29 | CA$14.46 | +0.87% |
| NGT.TO | CA$116.00 | -1.06% | 127.4B | 15.20 | CA$7.63 | +0.59% |
| ABX.TO | CA$59.05 | +3.23% | 98.9B | 14.80 | CA$3.99 | +1.96% |
| WPM.TO | CA$189.94 | +5.74% | 86.2B | 43.17 | CA$4.40 | +0.51% |
| FNV.TO | CA$317.51 | +1.86% | 61.2B | 40.60 | CA$7.82 | +0.69% |
| K.TO | CA$43.13 | +3.63% | 51.7B | 13.52 | CA$3.19 | +0.43% |
| 0ABX.L | CA$29.58 | +1.34% | 50.9B | 16.34 | CA$1.81 | +3.93% |
| AGI.TO | CA$59.34 | +2.52% | 24.9B | 17.40 | CA$3.41 | +0.27% |
| LUG.TO | CA$95.99 | +3.89% | 23.2B | 18.71 | CA$5.13 | +5.08% |
Stock Comparison
OMI.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while AEM.TO trades at CA$264.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check AEM.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while NGT.TO trades at CA$116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check NGT.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ABX.TO trades at CA$59.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ABX.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while WPM.TO trades at CA$189.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 43.17. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check WPM.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while FNV.TO trades at CA$317.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check FNV.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs K.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while K.TO trades at CA$43.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check K.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs 0ABX.L Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, 0ABX.L has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while 0ABX.L trades at CA$29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas 0ABX.L's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to 0ABX.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to 0ABX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check 0ABX.L's competition here
OMI.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while AGI.TO trades at CA$59.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check AGI.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while LUG.TO trades at CA$95.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check LUG.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while EDV.TO trades at CA$89.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check EDV.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check NCM.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while EQX.TO trades at CA$19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 39.08. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check EQX.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while IMG.TO trades at CA$25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check IMG.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs OR.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while OR.TO trades at CA$52.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check OR.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while OGC.TO trades at CA$43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check OGC.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while BTO.TO trades at CA$7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check BTO.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$46.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while NGD.TO trades at CA$12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check NGD.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ELD.TO trades at CA$46.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ELD.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while DPM.TO trades at CA$47.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check DPM.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check YRI.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while PRU.TO trades at CA$5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check PRU.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while OLA.TO trades at CA$20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check OLA.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while TXG.TO trades at CA$68.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check TXG.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while KNT.TO trades at CA$26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check KNT.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while WGX.TO trades at CA$5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check WGX.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs MAU.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MAU.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while MAU.TO trades at CA$14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas MAU.TO's P/E ratio is -76.32. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to MAU.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to MAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check MAU.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs NG.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while NG.TO trades at CA$11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -34.23. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check NG.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$40.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -66.16. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs CG.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while CG.TO trades at CA$25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check CG.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SSL.TO trades at CA$16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check SSL.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SEA.TO trades at CA$42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -80.66. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check SEA.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while WDO.TO trades at CA$28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check WDO.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ORA.TO trades at CA$45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -40.32. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ORA.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -301.25. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEE.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs SGD.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SGD.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SGD.TO trades at CA$15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SGD.TO's P/E ratio is -47.97. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SGD.TO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to SGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check SGD.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs SXGC.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SXGC.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SXGC.TO trades at CA$9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SXGC.TO's P/E ratio is -498.50. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SXGC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to SXGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check SXGC.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while RUP.TO trades at CA$10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -273.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check RUP.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check CXB.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while CNL.TO trades at CA$24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.57. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check CNL.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs ALK.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ALK.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ALK.TO trades at CA$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ALK.TO's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ALK.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ALK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ALK.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while IAU.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check IAU.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check OSK.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while MSA.TO trades at CA$5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check MSA.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs RIO.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, RIO.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while RIO.TO trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas RIO.TO's P/E ratio is -78.75. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to RIO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to RIO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check RIO.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ORE.TO trades at CA$2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ORE.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check SBB.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check KRR.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 916.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while GAU.TO trades at CA$3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -23.40. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check GAU.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs AUXX.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AUXX.V has a market cap of 800.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while AUXX.V trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas AUXX.V's P/E ratio is -73.50. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to AUXX.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to AUXX.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check AUXX.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 786.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while LGD.TO trades at CA$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -21.43. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check LGD.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 742.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while PRB.TO trades at CA$3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check PRB.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 726.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ITH.TO trades at CA$3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -117.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ITH.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs FF.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 691.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check FF.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs AR.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check AR.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs FDR.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 656.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while FDR.V trades at CA$5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -43.85. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check FDR.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 626.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while BSX.TO trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check BSX.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 603.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while JAG.TO trades at CA$7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -26.19. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check JAG.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of +89.41%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ASE.CN's competition here
OMI.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 499.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SBI.TO trades at CA$6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check SBI.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs TRX.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TRX.TO has a market cap of 493.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while TRX.TO trades at CA$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas TRX.TO's P/E ratio is -19.11. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to TRX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to TRX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check TRX.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs MND.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check MND.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 446.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGD.CN's competition here
OMI.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 364.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check STGO.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 353.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -20.62. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 265.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while NEXG.V trades at CA$1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check NEXG.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 264.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ELO.TO trades at CA$2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -27.87. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ELO.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs CBR.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 261.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check CBR.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 257.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while DNG.TO trades at CA$6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check DNG.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs LN.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while LN.TO trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check LN.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 196M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while GHRT.V trades at CA$1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check GHRT.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 194.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while STLR.TO trades at CA$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check STLR.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs G.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while G.TO trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check G.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while XTG.TO trades at CA$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check XTG.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check TNX.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs CGC.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check CGC.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check SANU.CN's competition here
OMI.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
OMI.TO vs AMQ.CN Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AMQ.CN has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while AMQ.CN trades at CA$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas AMQ.CN's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to AMQ.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to AMQ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check AMQ.CN's competition here
OMI.TO vs COG.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check COG.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO and VEIN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VEIN.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 111.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO and CCM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCM.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs YARR.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, YARR.V has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while YARR.V trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas YARR.V's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to YARR.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to YARR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check YARR.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check MAW.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs AGC.CN Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AGC.CN has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while AGC.CN trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas AGC.CN's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to AGC.CN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to AGC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check AGC.CN's competition here
OMI.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ESM.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while NOM.CN trades at CA$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check NOM.CN's competition here
OMI.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check SIG.CN's competition here
OMI.TO vs HMR.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check HMR.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs GPAC.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GPAC.V has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while GPAC.V trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas GPAC.V's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to GPAC.V's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to GPAC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check GPAC.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs TML.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO and TML.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TML.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs KLDC.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, KLDC.V has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while KLDC.V trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas KLDC.V's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to KLDC.V's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to KLDC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check KLDC.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs ME.TO Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check ME.TO's competition here
OMI.TO vs GSR.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GSR.V has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while GSR.V trades at CA$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas GSR.V's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to GSR.V's ROE of -82.95%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to GSR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check GSR.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs VLC.V Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO is less volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.TO.Check VLC.V's competition here
OMI.TO vs MLM.NE Comparison May 2026
OMI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MLM.NE has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI.TO is priced at CA$0.25, while MLM.NE trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.83, whereas MLM.NE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, OMI.TO's ROE is +8.34%, compared to MLM.NE's ROE of +11.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI.TO and MLM.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLM.NE's competition here