Loncor Gold Inc. (LN.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LN.TO | CA$1.38 | +0.00% | 253.5M | -34.50 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$116.00 | -1.06% | 127.4B | 15.20 | CA$7.63 | +0.59% |
| AEM.TO | CA$227.41 | +3.40% | 113.9B | 15.37 | CA$14.80 | +1.03% |
| ABX.TO | CA$56.25 | +3.12% | 94.2B | 11.14 | CA$5.05 | +2.24% |
| WPM.TO | CA$162.32 | +3.30% | 73.7B | 29.41 | CA$5.52 | +0.62% |
| FNV.TO | CA$293.33 | +1.09% | 56.6B | 29.63 | CA$9.90 | +0.77% |
| 0ABX.L | CA$29.58 | +1.34% | 50.9B | 16.34 | CA$1.81 | +4.28% |
| K.TO | CA$35.76 | +3.14% | 42.7B | 10.90 | CA$3.28 | +0.68% |
| AGI.TO | CA$49.19 | +2.20% | 20.6B | 14.05 | CA$3.50 | +0.36% |
| LUG.TO | CA$76.81 | +1.08% | 18.6B | 14.60 | CA$5.26 | +6.96% |
Stock Comparison
LN.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while NGT.TO trades at CA$116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check NGT.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while AEM.TO trades at CA$227.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check AEM.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ABX.TO trades at CA$56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ABX.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while WPM.TO trades at CA$162.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check WPM.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while FNV.TO trades at CA$293.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check FNV.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs 0ABX.L Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, 0ABX.L has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while 0ABX.L trades at CA$29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas 0ABX.L's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0ABX.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to 0ABX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check 0ABX.L's competition here
LN.TO vs K.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while K.TO trades at CA$35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check K.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while AGI.TO trades at CA$49.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check AGI.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while LUG.TO trades at CA$76.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check LUG.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check NCM.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while EDV.TO trades at CA$72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check EDV.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while IMG.TO trades at CA$23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check IMG.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while EQX.TO trades at CA$14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check EQX.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while NGD.TO trades at CA$12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check NGD.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs OR.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while OR.TO trades at CA$47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check OR.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ELD.TO trades at CA$42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ELD.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while DPM.TO trades at CA$44.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check DPM.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while OGC.TO trades at CA$36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check OGC.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$38.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while BTO.TO trades at CA$5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check BTO.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check YRI.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while PRU.TO trades at CA$4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check PRU.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs MAU.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, MAU.TO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while MAU.TO trades at CA$15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas MAU.TO's P/E ratio is -61.23. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MAU.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to MAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check MAU.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs OGC Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, OGC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while OGC trades at CA$26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas OGC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to OGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check OGC's competition here
LN.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while KNT.TO trades at CA$22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check KNT.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while TXG.TO trades at CA$56.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check TXG.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while OLA.TO trades at CA$14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check OLA.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SSL.TO trades at CA$16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SSL.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs NG.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while NG.TO trades at CA$10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -29.14. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check NG.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs CG.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while CG.TO trades at CA$22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check CG.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$35.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -23.72. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SEA.TO trades at CA$39.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -56.09. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SEA.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while WGX.TO trades at CA$4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check WGX.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ORA.TO trades at CA$45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -40.32. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ORA.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs PDI.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, PDI.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while PDI.TO trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas PDI.TO's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PDI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to PDI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check PDI.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs FVI.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, FVI.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while FVI.TO trades at CA$12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas FVI.TO's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FVI.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to FVI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check FVI.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while WDO.TO trades at CA$25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check WDO.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check CEE.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check CXB.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SXGC.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SXGC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SXGC.TO trades at CA$9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SXGC.TO's P/E ratio is -451.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SXGC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to SXGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SXGC.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -222.25. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while RUP.TO trades at CA$9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -235.75. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check RUP.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SGD.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SGD.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SGD.TO trades at CA$12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SGD.TO's P/E ratio is -34.56. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SGD.TO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to SGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SGD.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs ALK.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ALK.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ALK.TO trades at CA$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ALK.TO's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALK.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ALK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ALK.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while CNL.TO trades at CA$19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -29.06. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check CNL.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while MSA.TO trades at CA$6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check MSA.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check OSK.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while IAU.TO trades at CA$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check IAU.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ORE.TO trades at CA$2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ORE.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SBB.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check KRR.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs RIO.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, RIO.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while RIO.TO trades at CA$2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas RIO.TO's P/E ratio is 274.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RIO.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to RIO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check RIO.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs ATX.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ATX.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ATX.TO trades at CA$2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ATX.TO's P/E ratio is -11.71. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ATX.TO's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ATX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ATX.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 765.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while GAU.TO trades at CA$2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check GAU.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 758.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while LGD.TO trades at CA$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -20.43. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check LGD.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 742.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while PRB.TO trades at CA$3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check PRB.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs CTGO.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, CTGO.TO has a market cap of 707.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while CTGO.TO trades at CA$22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas CTGO.TO's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CTGO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to CTGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check CTGO.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs AR.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check AR.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 612.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ITH.TO trades at CA$2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -296.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ITH.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs FF.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 608.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check FF.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 494.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while BSX.TO trades at CA$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check BSX.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs MND.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check MND.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 482.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while JAG.TO trades at CA$5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -31.39. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check JAG.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 474.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is -40.62. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 463.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SBI.TO trades at CA$6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SBI.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs TRX.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, TRX.TO has a market cap of 426.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while TRX.TO trades at CA$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas TRX.TO's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TRX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to TRX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check TRX.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SGD.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 385M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ASE.CN trades at CA$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -13.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ASE.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 343.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check STGO.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 293.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while DNG.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check DNG.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 235.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ELO.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 163.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while STLR.TO trades at CA$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check STLR.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs G.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while G.TO trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check G.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is more volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SANU.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check TNX.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 119.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check XTG.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs COG.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check COG.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 111.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check CCM.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs AMQ.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, AMQ.CN has a market cap of 103.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while AMQ.CN trades at CA$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas AMQ.CN's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AMQ.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to AMQ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check AMQ.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check MAW.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SIG.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs AGC.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, AGC.CN has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while AGC.CN trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas AGC.CN's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AGC.CN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to AGC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check AGC.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ESM.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs TML.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check TML.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is more volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check NOM.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs MLM.NE Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, MLM.NE has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while MLM.NE trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas MLM.NE's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MLM.NE's ROE of +11.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to MLM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check MLM.NE's competition here
LN.TO vs ME.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check ME.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check NHK.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check BNN.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check AMM.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check HWG.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is more volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check USGD.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check GTCH.CN's competition here
LN.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check VGCX.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check SGNL.TO's competition here
LN.TO vs PME.TO Comparison June 2026
LN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LN.TO stands at 253.5M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LN.TO is priced at CA$1.38, while PME.TO trades at CA$4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.50, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, LN.TO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LN.TO is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LN.TO.Check PME.TO's competition here