McFarlane Lake Mining Limited
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (MLM.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLM.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLM.NE | CA$0.15 | +0.00% | 40.6M | -15.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| AEM.TO | CA$269.48 | +1.89% | 135B | 18.60 | CA$14.49 | +0.87% |
| NGT.TO | CA$116.00 | -1.06% | 127.4B | 15.20 | CA$7.63 | +0.59% |
| ABX.TO | CA$64.40 | +9.06% | 107.9B | 16.10 | CA$4.00 | +1.96% |
| WPM.TO | CA$196.65 | +3.53% | 89.3B | 36.35 | CA$5.41 | +0.51% |
| FNV.TO | CA$324.98 | +2.35% | 62.7B | 41.45 | CA$7.84 | +0.69% |
| K.TO | CA$43.53 | +0.93% | 52.1B | 13.60 | CA$3.20 | +0.43% |
| 0ABX.L | CA$29.58 | +1.34% | 50.9B | 16.34 | CA$1.81 | +3.93% |
| AGI.TO | CA$60.08 | +1.25% | 25.2B | 17.57 | CA$3.42 | +0.27% |
| LUG.TO | CA$97.68 | +1.76% | 23.6B | 18.97 | CA$5.15 | +5.08% |
Stock Comparison
MLM.NE vs AEM.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 135B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while AEM.TO trades at CA$269.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AEM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NGT.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while NGT.TO trades at CA$116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NGT.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ABX.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ABX.TO trades at CA$64.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ABX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs WPM.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while WPM.TO trades at CA$196.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 36.35. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WPM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs FNV.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while FNV.TO trades at CA$324.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FNV.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs K.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while K.TO trades at CA$43.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check K.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs 0ABX.L Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, 0ABX.L has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while 0ABX.L trades at CA$29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas 0ABX.L's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to 0ABX.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to 0ABX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check 0ABX.L's competition here
MLM.NE vs AGI.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while AGI.TO trades at CA$60.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AGI.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs LUG.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while LUG.TO trades at CA$97.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LUG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs EDV.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while EDV.TO trades at CA$92.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check EDV.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NCM.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NCM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs EQX.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while EQX.TO trades at CA$20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check EQX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs IMG.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while IMG.TO trades at CA$25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IMG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OR.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while OR.TO trades at CA$54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OGC.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while OGC.TO trades at CA$44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OGC.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs BTO.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while BTO.TO trades at CA$7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BTO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SSRM.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NGD.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while NGD.TO trades at CA$12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NGD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ELD.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ELD.TO trades at CA$47.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ELD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs DPM.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while DPM.TO trades at CA$47.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check DPM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs YRI.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check YRI.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs PRU.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while PRU.TO trades at CA$5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check PRU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OLA.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while OLA.TO trades at CA$20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OLA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs KNT.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while KNT.TO trades at CA$27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check KNT.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs TXG.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while TXG.TO trades at CA$69.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TXG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NG.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while NG.TO trades at CA$12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -36.06. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs MAU.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, MAU.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while MAU.TO trades at CA$15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas MAU.TO's P/E ratio is -79.21. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MAU.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MAU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs WGX.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while WGX.TO trades at CA$5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WGX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AAUC.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$40.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CG.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while CG.TO trades at CA$25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SEA.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SEA.TO trades at CA$45.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -86.26. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SEA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SSL.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SSL.TO trades at CA$16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SSL.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs WDO.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while WDO.TO trades at CA$29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WDO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ORA.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ORA.TO trades at CA$45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -40.32. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ORA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GTWO.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -305.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CEE.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEE.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SGD.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SGD.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SGD.TO trades at CA$16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SGD.TO's P/E ratio is -48.97. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SGD.TO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SGD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SXGC.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SXGC.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SXGC.TO trades at CA$10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SXGC.TO's P/E ratio is -508.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SXGC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SXGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SXGC.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs RUP.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while RUP.TO trades at CA$10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -274.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check RUP.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CXB.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CXB.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CNL.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while CNL.TO trades at CA$23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -30.35. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CNL.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ALK.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ALK.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ALK.TO trades at CA$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ALK.TO's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ALK.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ALK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ALK.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs IAU.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while IAU.TO trades at CA$2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IAU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OSK.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OSK.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs MSA.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while MSA.TO trades at CA$5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MSA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs RIO.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, RIO.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while RIO.TO trades at CA$3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas RIO.TO's P/E ratio is -80.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to RIO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to RIO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check RIO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ORE.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ORE.TO trades at CA$2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ORE.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SBB.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SBB.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs KRR.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check KRR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GAU.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 955.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while GAU.TO trades at CA$3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GAU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AUXX.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, AUXX.V has a market cap of 860.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while AUXX.V trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas AUXX.V's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AUXX.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AUXX.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AUXX.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs LGD.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 797.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while LGD.TO trades at CA$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -21.71. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LGD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ITH.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 795.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ITH.TO trades at CA$3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -128.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ITH.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs PRB.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 742.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while PRB.TO trades at CA$3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check PRB.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs FF.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 691.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FF.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AR.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs FDR.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 654M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while FDR.V trades at CA$5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -43.69. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FDR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs BSX.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 635.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while BSX.TO trades at CA$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -67.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BSX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs JAG.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 622.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while JAG.TO trades at CA$7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check JAG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs TRX.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, TRX.TO has a market cap of 573.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while TRX.TO trades at CA$1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas TRX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.60. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to TRX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to TRX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TRX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ASE.CN Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 567.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of +89.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ASE.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs SBI.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 505.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SBI.TO trades at CA$6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SBI.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs MND.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MND.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs VGZ.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 471.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is -40.37. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SGD.CN Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGD.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs MOZ.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs STGO.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 364.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check STGO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GOLD.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -20.87. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ELO.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 278.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ELO.TO trades at CA$2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -29.37. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ELO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NEXG.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 264.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while NEXG.V trades at CA$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NEXG.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs CBR.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 264.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while CBR.V trades at CA$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CBR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs DNG.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 253.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while DNG.TO trades at CA$6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check DNG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs LN.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while LN.TO trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LN.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GHRT.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while GHRT.V trades at CA$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GHRT.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs STLR.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 199.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while STLR.TO trades at CA$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check STLR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs G.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while G.TO trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check G.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs XTG.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 144.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while XTG.TO trades at CA$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check XTG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs BLLG.CN Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs AMQ.CN Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, AMQ.CN has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while AMQ.CN trades at CA$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas AMQ.CN's P/E ratio is -83.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AMQ.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AMQ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AMQ.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs TNX.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TNX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CGC.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CGC.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs SANU.CN Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SANU.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs YARR.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, YARR.V has a market cap of 118.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while YARR.V trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas YARR.V's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to YARR.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to YARR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check YARR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs COG.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check COG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs VEIN.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE and VEIN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VEIN.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs CCM.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CCM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs MAW.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MAW.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AGC.CN Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, AGC.CN has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while AGC.CN trades at CA$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas AGC.CN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AGC.CN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AGC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AGC.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs NOM.CN Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while NOM.CN trades at CA$1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NOM.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs SIG.CN Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SIG.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs ESM.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ESM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs HMR.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check HMR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs GPAC.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, GPAC.V has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while GPAC.V trades at CA$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas GPAC.V's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GPAC.V's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GPAC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GPAC.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs TML.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE and TML.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TML.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs KLDC.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, KLDC.V has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while KLDC.V trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas KLDC.V's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to KLDC.V's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to KLDC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check KLDC.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs ME.TO Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ME.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GSR.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, GSR.V has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while GSR.V trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas GSR.V's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GSR.V's ROE of -82.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GSR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GSR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs VLC.V Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check VLC.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs GTCH.CN Comparison May 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 40.6M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.15, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GTCH.CN's competition here