McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MLM.NE's competitors and their performance on the NEO and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MLM.NE and its NEO peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLM.NE | CA$0.40 | +11.27% | 106.9M | -19.64 | -CA$0.02 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$116.00 | -1.06% | 127.4B | 15.20 | CA$7.63 | +0.30% |
| AEM.TO | CA$204.81 | +0.67% | 102.4B | 14.73 | CA$13.90 | +1.15% |
| ABX.TO | CA$52.34 | +0.06% | 87.7B | 12.41 | CA$4.22 | +2.42% |
| WPM.TO | CA$157.27 | +1.48% | 71.4B | 30.52 | CA$5.15 | +0.64% |
| FNV.TO | CA$303.12 | +0.46% | 58.5B | 31.81 | CA$9.53 | +0.75% |
| 0ABX.L | CA$29.58 | +1.34% | 50.9B | 16.34 | CA$1.81 | +4.28% |
| K.TO | CA$33.66 | +0.87% | 40.2B | 10.86 | CA$3.10 | +0.72% |
| LUG.TO | CA$79.38 | +0.46% | 19.2B | 15.27 | CA$5.20 | +6.86% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Newmont Corporation (TSX: NGT.TO)
MLM.NE vs NGT.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while NGT.TO trades at CA$116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NGT.TO's competition here
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (TSX: AEM.TO)
MLM.NE vs AEM.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while AEM.TO trades at CA$204.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AEM.TO's competition here
Barrick Gold Corporation (TSX: ABX.TO)
MLM.NE vs ABX.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while ABX.TO trades at CA$52.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ABX.TO's competition here
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (TSX: WPM.TO)
MLM.NE vs WPM.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while WPM.TO trades at CA$157.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WPM.TO's competition here
Franco-Nevada Corporation (TSX: FNV.TO)
MLM.NE vs FNV.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while FNV.TO trades at CA$303.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FNV.TO's competition here
Barrick Gold Corporation (TSX: 0ABX.L)
MLM.NE vs 0ABX.L Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, 0ABX.L has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while 0ABX.L trades at CA$29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas 0ABX.L's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to 0ABX.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to 0ABX.L. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check 0ABX.L's competition here
Kinross Gold Corporation (TSX: K.TO)
MLM.NE vs K.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while K.TO trades at CA$33.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check K.TO's competition here
Lundin Gold Inc. (TSX: LUG.TO)
MLM.NE vs LUG.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while LUG.TO trades at CA$79.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LUG.TO's competition here
Newcrest Mining Limited (TSX: NCM.TO)
MLM.NE vs NCM.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NCM.TO's competition here
Alamos Gold Inc. (TSX: AGI.TO)
MLM.NE vs AGI.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while AGI.TO trades at CA$41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AGI.TO's competition here
Endeavour Mining plc (TSX: EDV.TO)
MLM.NE vs EDV.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while EDV.TO trades at CA$67.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check EDV.TO's competition here
Iamgold Corporation (TSX: IMG.TO)
MLM.NE vs IMG.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while IMG.TO trades at CA$20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IMG.TO's competition here
Equinox Gold Corp. (TSX: EQX.TO)
MLM.NE vs EQX.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while EQX.TO trades at CA$13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check EQX.TO's competition here
DPM Metals Inc. (TSX: DPM.TO)
MLM.NE vs DPM.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while DPM.TO trades at CA$52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check DPM.TO's competition here
New Gold Inc. (TSX: NGD.TO)
MLM.NE vs NGD.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while NGD.TO trades at CA$12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NGD.TO's competition here
Eldorado Gold Corporation (TSX: ELD.TO)
MLM.NE vs ELD.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while ELD.TO trades at CA$44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ELD.TO's competition here
SSR Mining Inc. (TSX: SSRM.TO)
MLM.NE vs SSRM.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
OR Royalties Inc. (TSX: OR.TO)
MLM.NE vs OR.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while OR.TO trades at CA$41.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OR.TO's competition here
Yamana Gold Inc. (TSX: YRI.TO)
MLM.NE vs YRI.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check YRI.TO's competition here
OceanaGold Corporation (TSX: OGC.TO)
MLM.NE vs OGC.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while OGC.TO trades at CA$33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OGC.TO's competition here
B2Gold Corp. (TSX: BTO.TO)
MLM.NE vs BTO.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while BTO.TO trades at CA$5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BTO.TO's competition here
Montage Gold Corp. (TSX: MAU.TO)
MLM.NE vs MAU.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, MAU.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while MAU.TO trades at CA$16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas MAU.TO's P/E ratio is -160.71. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MAU.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to MAU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MAU.TO's competition here
K92 Mining Inc. (TSX: KNT.TO)
MLM.NE vs KNT.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while KNT.TO trades at CA$22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check KNT.TO's competition here
Torex Gold Resources Inc. (TSX: TXG.TO)
MLM.NE vs TXG.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while TXG.TO trades at CA$54.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TXG.TO's competition here
Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA.TO)
MLM.NE vs OLA.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while OLA.TO trades at CA$13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OLA.TO's competition here
Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (TSX: SSL.TO)
MLM.NE vs SSL.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SSL.TO trades at CA$16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SSL.TO's competition here
Centerra Gold Inc. (TSX: CG.TO)
MLM.NE vs CG.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while CG.TO trades at CA$22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CG.TO's competition here
Westgold Resources Limited (TSX: WGX.TO)
MLM.NE vs WGX.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while WGX.TO trades at CA$4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WGX.TO's competition here
Seabridge Gold Inc. (TSX: SEA.TO)
MLM.NE vs SEA.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SEA.TO trades at CA$36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -49.08. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SEA.TO's competition here
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. (TSX: WDO.TO)
MLM.NE vs WDO.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while WDO.TO trades at CA$26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WDO.TO's competition here
Aura Minerals Inc. (TSX: ORA.TO)
MLM.NE vs ORA.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while ORA.TO trades at CA$45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -40.32. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ORA.TO's competition here
NovaGold Resources Inc. (TSX: NG.TO)
MLM.NE vs NG.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while NG.TO trades at CA$8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -21.35. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NG.TO's competition here
Fortuna Mining Corp. (TSX: FVI.TO)
MLM.NE vs FVI.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, FVI.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while FVI.TO trades at CA$12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas FVI.TO's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to FVI.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to FVI.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FVI.TO's competition here
Predictive Discovery Limited (TSX: PDI.TO)
MLM.NE vs PDI.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, PDI.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while PDI.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas PDI.TO's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to PDI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to PDI.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check PDI.TO's competition here
Centamin plc (TSX: CEE.TO)
MLM.NE vs CEE.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CEE.TO's competition here
Calibre Mining Corp. (TSX: CXB.TO)
MLM.NE vs CXB.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CXB.TO's competition here
Snowline Gold Corp. (TSX: SGD.TO)
MLM.NE vs SGD.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SGD.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SGD.TO trades at CA$13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SGD.TO's P/E ratio is -43.13. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SGD.TO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SGD.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SGD.TO's competition here
Rupert Resources Ltd. (TSX: RUP.TO)
MLM.NE vs RUP.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while RUP.TO trades at CA$10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -267.72. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check RUP.TO's competition here
Southern Cross Gold Consolidated Ltd. (TSX: SXGC.TO)
MLM.NE vs SXGC.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SXGC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SXGC.TO trades at CA$9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SXGC.TO's P/E ratio is -196.51. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SXGC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SXGC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SXGC.TO's competition here
Mineros S.A. (TSX: MSA.TO)
MLM.NE vs MSA.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while MSA.TO trades at CA$7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MSA.TO's competition here
Alkane Resources Ltd. (TSX: ALK.TO)
MLM.NE vs ALK.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, ALK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while ALK.TO trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas ALK.TO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ALK.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ALK.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ALK.TO's competition here
Osisko Mining Inc. (TSX: OSK.TO)
MLM.NE vs OSK.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OSK.TO's competition here
Collective Mining Ltd. (TSX: CNL.TO)
MLM.NE vs CNL.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while CNL.TO trades at CA$17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CNL.TO's competition here
i-80 Gold Corp (TSX: IAU.TO)
MLM.NE vs IAU.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while IAU.TO trades at CA$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IAU.TO's competition here
Hemlo Mining Corp. (TSX: HMMC.TO)
MLM.NE vs HMMC.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, HMMC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while HMMC.TO trades at CA$5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas HMMC.TO's P/E ratio is 56.59. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to HMMC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to HMMC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check HMMC.TO's competition here
Orezone Gold Corporation (TSX: ORE.TO)
MLM.NE vs ORE.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while ORE.TO trades at CA$2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ORE.TO's competition here
Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. (TSX: SBB.TO)
MLM.NE vs SBB.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SBB.TO's competition here
Karora Resources Inc. (TSX: KRR.TO)
MLM.NE vs KRR.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check KRR.TO's competition here
Rio2 Limited (TSX: RIO.TO)
MLM.NE vs RIO.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, RIO.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while RIO.TO trades at CA$2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas RIO.TO's P/E ratio is -176.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to RIO.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to RIO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check RIO.TO's competition here
First Mining Gold Corp. (TSX: FF.TO)
MLM.NE vs FF.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 872M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FF.TO's competition here
ATEX Resources Inc. (TSX: ATX.TO)
MLM.NE vs ATX.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, ATX.TO has a market cap of 857.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while ATX.TO trades at CA$2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas ATX.TO's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ATX.TO's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ATX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ATX.TO's competition here
Probe Gold Inc. (TSX: PRB.TO)
MLM.NE vs PRB.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 742.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while PRB.TO trades at CA$3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check PRB.TO's competition here
Contango Silver & Gold Inc. (TSX: CTGO.TO)
MLM.NE vs CTGO.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, CTGO.TO has a market cap of 721.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while CTGO.TO trades at CA$22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas CTGO.TO's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CTGO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CTGO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CTGO.TO's competition here
Liberty Gold Corp. (TSX: LGD.TO)
MLM.NE vs LGD.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 716M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while LGD.TO trades at CA$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -15.54. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LGD.TO's competition here
Galiano Gold Inc. (TSX: GAU.TO)
MLM.NE vs GAU.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 687M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while GAU.TO trades at CA$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GAU.TO's competition here
Argonaut Gold Inc. (TSX: AR.TO)
MLM.NE vs AR.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AR.TO's competition here
International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (TSX: ITH.TO)
MLM.NE vs ITH.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while ITH.TO trades at CA$2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -212.55. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ITH.TO's competition here
Mandalay Resources Corporation (TSX: MND.TO)
MLM.NE vs MND.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MND.TO's competition here
Jaguar Mining Inc. (TSX: JAG.TO)
MLM.NE vs JAG.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while JAG.TO trades at CA$5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -36.53. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check JAG.TO's competition here
Belo Sun Mining Corp (TSX: BSX.TO)
MLM.NE vs BSX.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -37.80. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BSX.TO's competition here
Snowline Gold Corp. (CNQ: SGD.CN)
MLM.NE vs SGD.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SGD.CN's competition here
Marathon Gold Corporation (TSX: MOZ.TO)
MLM.NE vs MOZ.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
Serabi Gold plc (TSX: SBI.TO)
MLM.NE vs SBI.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 370.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SBI.TO trades at CA$4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SBI.TO's competition here
TRX Gold Corporation (TSX: TRX.TO)
MLM.NE vs TRX.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, TRX.TO has a market cap of 360.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while TRX.TO trades at CA$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas TRX.TO's P/E ratio is -13.52. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to TRX.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to TRX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TRX.TO's competition here
Vista Gold Corp. (TSX: VGZ.TO)
MLM.NE vs VGZ.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 356.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is -57.10. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
Steppe Gold Ltd. (TSX: STGO.TO)
MLM.NE vs STGO.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 313.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check STGO.TO's competition here
GoldMining Inc. (TSX: GOLD.TO)
MLM.NE vs GOLD.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -16.98. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
Loncor Gold Inc. (TSX: LN.TO)
MLM.NE vs LN.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while LN.TO trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LN.TO's competition here
Eloro Resources Ltd. (TSX: ELO.TO)
MLM.NE vs ELO.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ELO.TO's competition here
STLLR Gold Inc. (TSX: STLR.TO)
MLM.NE vs STLR.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 162.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while STLR.TO trades at CA$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check STLR.TO's competition here
Augusta Gold Corp. (TSX: G.TO)
MLM.NE vs G.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while G.TO trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check G.TO's competition here
TRX Gold Corporation (TSX: TNX.TO)
MLM.NE vs TNX.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TNX.TO's competition here
Abitibi Metals Corp. (CNQ: AMQ.CN)
MLM.NE vs AMQ.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, AMQ.CN has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while AMQ.CN trades at CA$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas AMQ.CN's P/E ratio is -76.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AMQ.CN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AMQ.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AMQ.CN's competition here
Sanu Gold Corp. (CNQ: SANU.CN)
MLM.NE vs SANU.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SANU.CN's competition here
Condor Gold Plc (TSX: COG.TO)
MLM.NE vs COG.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check COG.TO's competition here
Xtra-Gold Resources Corp. (TSX: XTG.TO)
MLM.NE vs XTG.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 62.44. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check XTG.TO's competition here
Mawson Gold Limited (TSX: MAW.TO)
MLM.NE vs MAW.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MAW.TO's competition here
Sitka Gold Corp. (CNQ: SIG.CN)
MLM.NE vs SIG.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SIG.CN's competition here
Blue Lagoon Resources Inc. (CNQ: BLLG.CN)
MLM.NE vs BLLG.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
Treasury Metals Inc. (TSX: TML.TO)
MLM.NE vs TML.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TML.TO's competition here
Avanti Gold Corp. (CNQ: AGC.CN)
MLM.NE vs AGC.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, AGC.CN has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while AGC.CN trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas AGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AGC.CN's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AGC.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AGC.CN's competition here
Norsemont Mining Inc. (CNQ: NOM.CN)
MLM.NE vs NOM.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NOM.CN's competition here
Moneta Gold Inc. (TSX: ME.TO)
MLM.NE vs ME.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ME.TO's competition here
Emperor Metals Inc. (CNQ: AUOZ.CN)
MLM.NE vs AUOZ.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AUOZ.CN's competition here
Headwater Gold Inc. (CNQ: HWG.CN)
MLM.NE vs HWG.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -9.24. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check HWG.CN's competition here
Nighthawk Gold Corp. (TSX: NHK.TO)
MLM.NE vs NHK.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NHK.TO's competition here
Benjamin Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNN.CN)
MLM.NE vs BNN.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BNN.CN's competition here
Getchell Gold Corp. (CNQ: GTCH.CN)
MLM.NE vs GTCH.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GTCH.CN's competition here
Almaden Minerals Ltd. (TSX: AMM.TO)
MLM.NE vs AMM.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AMM.TO's competition here
Victoria Gold Corp. (TSX: VGCX.TO)
MLM.NE vs VGCX.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check VGCX.TO's competition here
Signal Gold Inc. (TSX: SGNL.TO)
MLM.NE vs SGNL.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SGNL.TO's competition here
American Pacific Mining Corp. (CNQ: USGD.CN)
MLM.NE vs USGD.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is -17.46. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check USGD.CN's competition here
Four Nines Gold Inc. (CNQ: FNAU.CN)
MLM.NE vs FNAU.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, FNAU.CN has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while FNAU.CN trades at CA$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas FNAU.CN's P/E ratio is -44.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to FNAU.CN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to FNAU.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FNAU.CN's competition here
Westward Gold Inc. (CNQ: WG.CN)
MLM.NE vs WG.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, WG.CN has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while WG.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas WG.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to WG.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to WG.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WG.CN's competition here
Irving Resources Inc. (CNQ: IRV.CN)
MLM.NE vs IRV.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while IRV.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -34.48. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IRV.CN's competition here
Yorbeau Resources Inc. (TSX: YRB.TO)
MLM.NE vs YRB.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while YRB.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check YRB.TO's competition here
Novo Resources Corp. (TSX: NVO.TO)
MLM.NE vs NVO.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NVO.TO's competition here
Gold Springs Resource Corp. (TSX: GRC.TO)
MLM.NE vs GRC.TO Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GRC.TO's competition here
C2C Gold Corp. (CNQ: CTOC.CN)
MLM.NE vs CTOC.CN Comparison July 2026
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (NEO: MLM.NE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 106.9M. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.40 on the NEO, while CTOC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -19.64, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +11.20%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CTOC.CN's competition here