McFarlane Lake Mining Limited
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (MLM.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLM.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLM.NE | CA$0.14 | +3.70% | 37.9M | -14.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| AEM.TO | CA$302.27 | +1.12% | 151.4B | 24.52 | CA$12.33 | +0.76% |
| NGT.TO | CA$116.00 | -1.06% | 127.4B | 15.20 | CA$7.63 | +0.59% |
| ABX.TO | CA$60.27 | +2.62% | 101B | 14.77 | CA$4.08 | +1.93% |
| WPM.TO | CA$200.24 | +2.81% | 90.9B | 44.70 | CA$4.48 | +0.48% |
| FNV.TO | CA$361.34 | +0.23% | 69.7B | 45.05 | CA$8.02 | +0.60% |
| K.TO | CA$46.73 | +2.93% | 56B | 17.31 | CA$2.70 | +0.40% |
| 0ABX.L | CA$29.58 | +1.34% | 50.9B | 16.34 | CA$1.81 | +3.93% |
| LUG.TO | CA$118.32 | +4.91% | 28.6B | 25.95 | CA$4.56 | +4.19% |
| AGI.TO | CA$67.10 | +3.10% | 28.2B | 23.06 | CA$2.91 | +0.24% |
Stock Comparison
MLM.NE vs AEM.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 151.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while AEM.TO trades at CA$302.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AEM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NGT.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while NGT.TO trades at CA$116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NGT.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ABX.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ABX.TO trades at CA$60.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ABX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs WPM.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while WPM.TO trades at CA$200.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 44.70. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WPM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs FNV.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while FNV.TO trades at CA$361.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 45.05. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FNV.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs K.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while K.TO trades at CA$46.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check K.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs 0ABX.L Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, 0ABX.L has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while 0ABX.L trades at CA$29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas 0ABX.L's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to 0ABX.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to 0ABX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check 0ABX.L's competition here
MLM.NE vs LUG.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while LUG.TO trades at CA$118.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LUG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AGI.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while AGI.TO trades at CA$67.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AGI.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs EDV.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while EDV.TO trades at CA$90.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check EDV.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NCM.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NCM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs EQX.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while EQX.TO trades at CA$20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is -521.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check EQX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs IMG.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while IMG.TO trades at CA$27.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IMG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OGC.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while OGC.TO trades at CA$47.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OGC.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OR.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while OR.TO trades at CA$54.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs DPM.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while DPM.TO trades at CA$54.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check DPM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ELD.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ELD.TO trades at CA$50.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ELD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NGD.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while NGD.TO trades at CA$12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NGD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SSRM.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs BTO.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while BTO.TO trades at CA$6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BTO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OLA.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while OLA.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 59.52. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OLA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs YRI.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check YRI.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs PRU.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while PRU.TO trades at CA$5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check PRU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs TXG.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while TXG.TO trades at CA$67.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TXG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs WGX.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while WGX.TO trades at CA$6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WGX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs KNT.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while KNT.TO trades at CA$24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check KNT.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs MAU.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MAU.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while MAU.TO trades at CA$16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas MAU.TO's P/E ratio is -86.63. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to MAU.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MAU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NG.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while NG.TO trades at CA$13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -36.53. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AAUC.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -69.17. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CG.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CG.TO trades at CA$26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SSL.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SSL.TO trades at CA$16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SSL.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SEA.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SEA.TO trades at CA$43.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -81.43. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SEA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs WDO.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while WDO.TO trades at CA$28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WDO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ORA.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ORA.TO trades at CA$45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -40.32. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ORA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CEE.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEE.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GTWO.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -225.80. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SXGC.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SXGC.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SXGC.TO trades at CA$10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SXGC.TO's P/E ratio is -253.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SXGC.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SXGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SXGC.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SGD.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SGD.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SGD.TO trades at CA$14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SGD.TO's P/E ratio is -44.33. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SGD.TO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SGD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CXB.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CXB.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CNL.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CNL.TO trades at CA$26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -32.23. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CNL.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ALK.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ALK.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ALK.TO trades at CA$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ALK.TO's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ALK.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ALK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ALK.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs IAU.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while IAU.TO trades at CA$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IAU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OSK.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OSK.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs RUP.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while RUP.TO trades at CA$6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -166.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check RUP.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs MSA.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while MSA.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MSA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ORE.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ORE.TO trades at CA$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ORE.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs RIO.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, RIO.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while RIO.TO trades at CA$2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas RIO.TO's P/E ratio is -70.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to RIO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to RIO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check RIO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SBB.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SBB.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs KRR.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check KRR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GAU.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 973.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while GAU.TO trades at CA$3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -24.87. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GAU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ITH.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 751.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ITH.TO trades at CA$3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -121.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ITH.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs PRB.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 742.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while PRB.TO trades at CA$3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check PRB.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AUXX.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AUXX.V has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while AUXX.V trades at CA$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas AUXX.V's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to AUXX.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AUXX.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AUXX.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs LGD.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 709.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while LGD.TO trades at CA$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -19.43. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LGD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs BSX.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 692.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while BSX.TO trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -73.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BSX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs FF.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 671M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FF.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AR.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs JAG.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 625M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while JAG.TO trades at CA$7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -26.18. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check JAG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ASE.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 607.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of +89.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ASE.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs TRX.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TRX.TO has a market cap of 605.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while TRX.TO trades at CA$2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas TRX.TO's P/E ratio is -211.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to TRX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to TRX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TRX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs FDR.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 538.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while FDR.V trades at CA$4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FDR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs MND.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MND.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SBI.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 425.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SBI.TO trades at CA$5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SBI.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SGD.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGD.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs VGZ.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 401.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is -34.62. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs MOZ.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GOLD.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 374.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs STGO.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 354M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check STGO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NEXG.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 265.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while NEXG.V trades at CA$1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NEXG.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs CBR.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 253.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -18.10. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CBR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs LN.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while LN.TO trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LN.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs DNG.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 253.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while DNG.TO trades at CA$6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check DNG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ELO.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ELO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs STLR.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while STLR.TO trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check STLR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs G.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while G.TO trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check G.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GHRT.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 144.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GHRT.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs XTG.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while XTG.TO trades at CA$3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check XTG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs TNX.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TNX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CGC.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CGC.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs ESM.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ESM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SANU.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SANU.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs CCM.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CCM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs COG.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check COG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs VEIN.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 113.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE and VEIN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VEIN.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs BLLG.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -14.80. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs YARR.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, YARR.V has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while YARR.V trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas YARR.V's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to YARR.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to YARR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check YARR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs MAW.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MAW.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AGC.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AGC.CN has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while AGC.CN trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas AGC.CN's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to AGC.CN's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AGC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AGC.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs AMQ.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AMQ.CN has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while AMQ.CN trades at CA$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas AMQ.CN's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to AMQ.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to AMQ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AMQ.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs NOM.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while NOM.CN trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -22.17. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NOM.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs SIG.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SIG.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs GPAC.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GPAC.V has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while GPAC.V trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas GPAC.V's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to GPAC.V's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to GPAC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GPAC.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs TML.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE and TML.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TML.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs HMR.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check HMR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs ME.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ME.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs HWG.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check HWG.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs VLC.V Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE and VLC.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLC.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs RISE.CN Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check RISE.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs NHK.TO Comparison April 2026
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -14.00, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +23.04%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NHK.TO's competition here