Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AEM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEM.TO | CA$277.52 | -6.08% | 139B | 22.80 | CA$12.17 | +0.42% |
| NGT.TO | CA$116.00 | -1.06% | 127.4B | 15.20 | CA$7.63 | +0.59% |
| ABX.TO | CA$55.35 | -5.71% | 92.7B | 13.77 | CA$4.02 | +1.47% |
| WPM.TO | CA$194.00 | -4.75% | 88.1B | 43.50 | CA$4.46 | +0.49% |
| FNV.TO | CA$338.54 | -3.82% | 65.3B | 42.64 | CA$7.94 | +0.33% |
| K.TO | CA$43.82 | -7.51% | 52.5B | 16.29 | CA$2.69 | +0.42% |
| 0ABX.L | CA$29.58 | +1.34% | 50.9B | 16.34 | CA$1.81 | +2.77% |
| AGI.TO | CA$60.87 | -9.01% | 25.6B | 20.99 | CA$2.90 | +0.14% |
| LUG.TO | CA$103.92 | -9.78% | 25.1B | 23.06 | CA$4.50 | +4.67% |
| EDV.TO | CA$85.70 | -5.73% | 20.8B | 22.73 | CA$3.77 | +1.30% |
Stock Comparison
AEM.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while NGT.TO trades at CA$116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NGT.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ABX.TO trades at CA$55.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ABX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while WPM.TO trades at CA$194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check WPM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while FNV.TO trades at CA$338.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check FNV.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs K.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while K.TO trades at CA$43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check K.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs 0ABX.L Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, 0ABX.L has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while 0ABX.L trades at CA$29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas 0ABX.L's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0ABX.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to 0ABX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check 0ABX.L's competition here
AEM.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while AGI.TO trades at CA$60.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AGI.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while LUG.TO trades at CA$103.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check LUG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while EDV.TO trades at CA$85.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check EDV.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NCM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while EQX.TO trades at CA$19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is -484.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check EQX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while IMG.TO trades at CA$23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check IMG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while OGC.TO trades at CA$45.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check OGC.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs OR.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while OR.TO trades at CA$54.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check OR.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while NGD.TO trades at CA$12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NGD.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while DPM.TO trades at CA$49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check DPM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while BTO.TO trades at CA$6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check BTO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ELD.TO trades at CA$43.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ELD.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$40.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check YRI.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while PRU.TO trades at CA$5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check PRU.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while OLA.TO trades at CA$19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 48.12. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check OLA.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while KNT.TO trades at CA$25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check KNT.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while TXG.TO trades at CA$62.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check TXG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while WGX.TO trades at CA$6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check WGX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs NG.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while NG.TO trades at CA$12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -35.39. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$43.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -70.37. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs MAU.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, MAU.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while MAU.TO trades at CA$14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas MAU.TO's P/E ratio is -77.63. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAU.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to MAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check MAU.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CG.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while CG.TO trades at CA$25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SSL.TO trades at CA$16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SSL.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SEA.TO trades at CA$42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -79.47. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SEA.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while WDO.TO trades at CA$27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check WDO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ORA.TO trades at CA$45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -40.32. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ORA.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CEE.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -217.80. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SXGC.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SXGC.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SXGC.TO trades at CA$10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SXGC.TO's P/E ratio is -539.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SXGC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SXGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SXGC.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SGD.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SGD.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SGD.TO trades at CA$15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SGD.TO's P/E ratio is -45.94. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGD.TO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SGD.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while RUP.TO trades at CA$11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -160.86. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check RUP.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CXB.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while CNL.TO trades at CA$27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -34.59. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CNL.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ALK.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ALK.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ALK.TO trades at CA$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ALK.TO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALK.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ALK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ALK.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while IAU.TO trades at CA$2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check IAU.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check OSK.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while MSA.TO trades at CA$5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check MSA.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ORE.TO trades at CA$2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ORE.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SBB.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check KRR.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs RIO.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, RIO.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while RIO.TO trades at CA$2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas RIO.TO's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RIO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to RIO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check RIO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 884.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while GAU.TO trades at CA$3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -22.60. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GAU.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 813.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while LGD.TO trades at CA$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -22.14. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check LGD.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 742.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while PRB.TO trades at CA$3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check PRB.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs AUXX.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, AUXX.V has a market cap of 740.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while AUXX.V trades at CA$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas AUXX.V's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUXX.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AUXX.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AUXX.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while BSX.TO trades at CA$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -75.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check BSX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 708.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ITH.TO trades at CA$3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -114.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ITH.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 673.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of +89.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ASE.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs FF.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 664.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check FF.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs AR.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AR.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 628.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while JAG.TO trades at CA$7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -27.30. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check JAG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs FDR.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 575.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while FDR.V trades at CA$5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check FDR.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs TRX.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, TRX.TO has a market cap of 505M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while TRX.TO trades at CA$1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas TRX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.60. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to TRX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check TRX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs MND.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check MND.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SGD.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 415M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SBI.TO trades at CA$5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SBI.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 408.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is -35.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 361.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -21.12. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 354M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check STGO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 277.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while NEXG.V trades at CA$1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NEXG.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 261.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while DNG.TO trades at CA$6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check DNG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs LN.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while LN.TO trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check LN.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CBR.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 239.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -18.10. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CBR.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 237.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ELO.TO trades at CA$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ELO.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while STLR.TO trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check STLR.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 169.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while GHRT.V trades at CA$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GHRT.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while XTG.TO trades at CA$3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check XTG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs G.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while G.TO trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check G.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check TNX.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs CGC.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CGC.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SANU.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check CCM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ESM.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs COG.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check COG.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check VEIN.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs AMQ.CN Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, AMQ.CN has a market cap of 109.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while AMQ.CN trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas AMQ.CN's P/E ratio is -71.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMQ.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to AMQ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AMQ.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs YARR.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, YARR.V has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while YARR.V trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas YARR.V's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YARR.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to YARR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check YARR.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while NOM.CN trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -24.83. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NOM.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check MAW.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs AGC.CN Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, AGC.CN has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while AGC.CN trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas AGC.CN's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGC.CN's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to AGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check AGC.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check SIG.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs GPAC.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, GPAC.V has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while GPAC.V trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas GPAC.V's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GPAC.V's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to GPAC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GPAC.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs TML.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check TML.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs HMR.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check HMR.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs ME.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check ME.TO's competition here
AEM.TO vs RISE.CN Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check RISE.CN's competition here
AEM.TO vs KLDC.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, KLDC.V has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while KLDC.V trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas KLDC.V's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KLDC.V's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is less volatile compared to KLDC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check KLDC.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs VLC.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check VLC.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs GSR.V Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, GSR.V has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while GSR.V trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas GSR.V's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSR.V's ROE of -82.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to GSR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check GSR.V's competition here
AEM.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison April 2026
AEM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM.TO is priced at CA$277.52, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.80, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, AEM.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM.TO is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.TO.Check NHK.TO's competition here