Oi S.A.
Oi S.A. OIBR-C Peers
See (OIBR-C) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OIBR-C | $0.81 | N/A | 0 | -0.62 | -$1.32 | N/A |
| TMUS | $241.99 | -0.77% | 274.8B | 23.61 | $10.25 | +1.35% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TBB | $21.96 | +0.21% | 201.6B | 4.29 | $5.12 | +6.09% |
| T | $27.38 | -2.08% | 197B | 16.80 | $1.63 | +4.04% |
| VZ | $43.26 | -1.32% | 182.4B | 10.30 | $4.20 | +6.23% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.22% |
| T-PA | $19.91 | +0.33% | 143.3B | 8.38 | $2.38 | +4.04% |
| T-PC | $18.89 | +0.49% | 135.9B | 7.95 | $2.38 | +4.04% |
| CMCSA | $34.44 | -0.63% | 128.3B | 8.48 | $4.06 | +3.64% |
Stock Comparison
OIBR-C vs TMUS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 274.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TMUS trades at $241.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VZA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TBB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TBB trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs T Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, T has a market cap of 197B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while T trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VZ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 182.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VZ trades at $43.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TBC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs T-PA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 143.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while T-PA trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs T-PC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 135.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while T-PC trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CMCSA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CMCSA trades at $34.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AMOV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CHTR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CHTR trades at $388.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AMX Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AMX trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 35.73. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CHT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CHT trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TEF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TEF trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -52.70. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ORAN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VOD Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VOD trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TU Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TU trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BCE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BCE trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 70.89. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLK trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VIV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VIV trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SJR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RCI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RCI trades at $26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBRDP Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBRDP trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBRDA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBRDA trades at $92.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBRDK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBRDK trades at $92.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs KT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while KT trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MBT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FYBR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FYBR trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.31. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIMB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIMB trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CTDD Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CTDD trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SKM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SKM trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIGO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIGO trades at $36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TKC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TKC trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UZE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UZE trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UZD Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UZD trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs USM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while USM trades at $61.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -133.24. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UZF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UZF trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PHI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PHI trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBYKV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LUMN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LUMN trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CTBB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CTBB trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDS-PV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDS-PV trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDS trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -32.21. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDS-PU Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDS-PU trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SNRE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SNRE trades at $52.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -12.82. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBTYB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBTYB trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBTYA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBTYA trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBTYK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBTYK trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -15.81. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs DISH Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TEO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TEO trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 95.35. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IRDM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IRDM trades at $26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GSAT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GSAT trades at $19.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -31.65. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CCOI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CCOI trades at $47.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IHS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IHS trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -44.12. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ASTSW Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RADI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IDT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IDT trades at $58.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GOGO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GOGO trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -268.50. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LILAK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LILAK trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LILA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LILA trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ATUS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ATUS trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CABO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 820.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CABO trades at $145.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -40.37. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SHEN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 705.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SHEN trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RBBN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 634M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RBBN trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -12.82. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CNSL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ATEX Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ATEX trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -16.66. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs WOW Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 361.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while WOW trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs OOMA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while OOMA trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -68.29. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HCHC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ATNI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ATNI trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 213.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TV trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RDCM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RDCM trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CXDO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CXDO trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 69.63. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FNGR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 148M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FNGR trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -28.56. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VEON Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VEON trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MTSL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SIFY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SIFY trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -39.38. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDI trades at $33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs KORE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while KORE trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IQST Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IQST trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PCLA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PCLA trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ANTE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ANTE trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MIMO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UCL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UCL trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs QTEK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs QTEKW Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs COMSP Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs COMSW Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MIMO-WT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIGOR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LORL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs STRY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ALSK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PTNR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UZA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GTT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBYAV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CBB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at 0. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.