Oi S.A.
Oi S.A. OIBR-C Peers
See (OIBR-C) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
OIBR-C vs AXTLF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 28.57T. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AXTLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TMUS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 276.83B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TMUS trades at $243.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VZA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.26B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TBB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 201.86B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TBB trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs T Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, T has a market cap of 200.29B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while T trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas T's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VZ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 183.87B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VZ trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs DTEGF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 180.53B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while DTEGF trades at $36.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CHWRF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 180.15B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CHWRF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TBC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.83B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs DTEGY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 179.06B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while DTEGY trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs T-PA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 144.09B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while T-PA trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs T-PC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 136.64B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while T-PC trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CMCSA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 127.56B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CMCSA trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CUCSY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 88.90B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs NTTYY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 88.23B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while NTTYY trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs NPPXF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 85.63B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while NPPXF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs KDDIF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 78.73B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while KDDIF trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SFBQF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 74.20B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SFBQF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AMXVF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.58B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs KDDIY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 73.14B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while KDDIY trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SFTBY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 73.00B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SFTBY trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SFTBF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 70.70B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SFTBF trades at $49.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AMOVF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.57B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AMOV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.61B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CHTR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 56.39B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CHTR trades at $401.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AARTY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 55.12B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AARTY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 94.19. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CLLNY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 52.78B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CLLNY trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -623.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AMX Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 52.18B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AMX trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SNGNF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 52.02B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SNGNF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is -315.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SGAPY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 49.72B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SGAPY trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is -502.21. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FNCTF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 37.65B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FNCTF trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SWZCF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 34.41B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SWZCF trades at $664.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLGPY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 34.24B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLGPY trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SCMWY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 34.03B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SCMWY trades at $65.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CHT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.30B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CHT trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TTRAF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 32.58B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TTRAF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AVIFY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 30.72B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AVIFY trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ORAN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.64B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TEF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 28.13B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TEF trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -71.21. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TEFOF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 26.97B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TEFOF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -68.29. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AVIKF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.14B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CTOWY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 25.01B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TU Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.21B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TU trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VOD Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 23.88B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VOD trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VOD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VODPF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 22.70B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VODPF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BTGOF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 21.13B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BTGOF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BCE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.92B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BCE trades at $22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 174.54. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TELNF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 20.72B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TELNF trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TELNY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 20.00B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TELNY trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BCEPF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 19.57B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BCEPF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs KKPNY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 17.84B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while KKPNY trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AVIVF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs KKPNF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 17.20B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while KKPNF trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VIV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 16.15B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VIV trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 15.71B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLK trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HLTOY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.20B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HLTOY trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SJR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLSNF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.86B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLSNF trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SJRWF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.71B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ELMUY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ELMUY trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLSNY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.49B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLSNY trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VDMCY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.27B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VDMCY trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RCIAF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 14.16B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RCIAF trades at $28.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RCI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 14.09B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RCI trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLKMF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 13.87B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLKMF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBRDB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 13.37B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBRDB trades at $85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBRDP Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.35B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBRDP trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBRDA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.30B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBRDA trades at $91.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBRDK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.28B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBRDK trades at $92.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TCPFF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.44B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TCPFF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HKTTY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12.32B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HKTTY trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BCPPF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 11.98B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TELDY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 11.90B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TELDY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MTNOY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 11.80B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MTNOY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -22.52. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VODAF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.12B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BGAOY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 11.04B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BGAOY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BECEF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.67B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MTNOF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MTNOF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLTZY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.02B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLTZY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FRTAY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 9.65B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FRTAY trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs KT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while KT trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MBT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.28B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MBT's ROE of -6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BCEXF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.22B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIAOF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 9.20B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIAOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLTZF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 9.19B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLTZF trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FYBR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FYBR trades at $36.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.40. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIAIY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIAIY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -13.38. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs DIGBF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.80B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SKM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SKM trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIAJF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.69B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIMB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.34B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIMB trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ELMUF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.01B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ELMUF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SHNUF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.66B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SHNUF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HKTTF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HKTTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CTDD Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 7.56B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CTDD trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SOBKY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SOBKY trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TELDF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TELDF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MYTEF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs QBCRF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.28B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while QBCRF trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HLTOF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs QBCAF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.21B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while QBCAF trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIGO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIGO trades at $34.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PCWLF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.57B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PCWLF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MAXSF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PCCWY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PCCWY trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -140.60. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs USM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while USM trades at $63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -137.48. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UZE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UZE trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UZF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UZF trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UZD Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UZD trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TRKNY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TRKNY trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TKC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TKC trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PHI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PHI trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TKAGY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PHTCF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GTMEY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AAFRF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AAFRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FRTAF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FRTAF trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BZQIF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BZQIF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TCMFF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TCMFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LUMN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LUMN trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CTBB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CTBB trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UDIRF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UDIRF trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -76.72. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBYKV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SNRE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SNRE trades at $54.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TFAOF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDS trades at $34.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -32.93. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BZQIY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BZQIY trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDS-PU Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDS-PU trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDS-PV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDS-PV trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IIJIF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AXXTF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AXXTF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBTYA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBTYA trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBTYB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBTYB trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.39. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBTYK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBTYK trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -15.34. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IIJIY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IIJIY trades at $36.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MICCF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PTITF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PTITF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs DISH Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to DISH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CUCSF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CUCSF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TEO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TEO trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TACYY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IRDM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IRDM trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TRKNF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLGHY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs NZTCF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while NZTCF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PTTWF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GMOYF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GMOYF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SPKKY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SPKKY trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CLCMF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CCOI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CCOI trades at $48.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BGAOF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BGAOF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CHRUF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CHRUF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -540.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GSAT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GSAT trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -29.81. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CHRYY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CHRYY has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CHRYY trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CHRYY's P/E ratio is -386.83. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CHRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CHRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs JSFCF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, JSFCF has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while JSFCF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas JSFCF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to JSFCF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to JSFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PTXKY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PTXKY trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CGEAF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CGEAF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CGEAF trades at $48.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CGEAF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CGEAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CGEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IQST Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IQST trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IHS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IHS trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ZONNF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ZONNF has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ZONNF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ZONNF's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ZONNF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ZONNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ASTSW Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SRHBY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SRHBY has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SRHBY trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SRHBY's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SRHBY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SRHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLGHF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLGHF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLGHF trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLGHF's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLGHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HTWSF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HTWSF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HTWSF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HTWSF's P/E ratio is 51.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HTWSF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to HTWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SMNUF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SMNUF has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SMNUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SMNUF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SMNUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to SMNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SRHBF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SRHBF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SRHBF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SRHBF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SRHBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to SRHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RADI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GOGO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GOGO trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GOGO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IDT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IDT trades at $55.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs JASUF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, JASUF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while JASUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas JASUF's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to JASUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to JASUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs OKCTF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, OKCTF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while OKCTF trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas OKCTF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to OKCTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to OKCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GAMCF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, GAMCF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GAMCF trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GAMCF's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GAMCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to GAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ATUS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ATUS trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MBISF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MBISF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MBISF trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MBISF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MBISF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to MBISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CELJF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CELJF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CELJF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CELJF's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CELJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CELJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CABO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 933.48M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CABO trades at $165.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -45.95. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CVHSY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CVHSY has a market cap of 929.21M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CVHSY trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CVHSY's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CVHSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CVHSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LILA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 901.05M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LILA trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LILAK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 900.77M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LILAK trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GRPFF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, GRPFF has a market cap of 835.63M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GRPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GRPFF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GRPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to GRPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MYTAY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MYTAY has a market cap of 829.72M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MYTAY trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MYTAY's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MYTAY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to MYTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LMGHF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LMGHF has a market cap of 630.10M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LMGHF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LMGHF's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LMGHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to LMGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIIAY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TIIAY has a market cap of 623.79M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIIAY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIIAY's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIIAY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TIIAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SHEN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 621.63M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SHEN trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLKGY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLKGY has a market cap of 612.94M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLKGY trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLKGY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLKGY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLKGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HKBNF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HKBNF has a market cap of 593.05M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HKBNF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HKBNF's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HKBNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to HKBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HTCTF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HTCTF has a market cap of 578.29M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HTCTF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HTCTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HTCTF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to HTCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TUALF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TUALF has a market cap of 566.13M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TUALF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TUALF's P/E ratio is -29.51. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TUALF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TUALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HUTCY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HUTCY has a market cap of 559.02M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HUTCY trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HUTCY's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HUTCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to HUTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RBBN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 556.11M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RBBN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CNSL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.69M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ROSYY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ROSYY has a market cap of 540.67M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ROSYY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ROSYY's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ROSYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to ROSYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ATEX Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 535.67M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ATEX trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CGECF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CGECF has a market cap of 457.45M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CGECF trades at $47.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CGECF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CGECF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CGECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs WOW Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 373.96M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while WOW trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs OOMA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 356.08M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while OOMA trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -49.69. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SIFY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 349.55M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SIFY trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 242.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BCOMF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BCOMF has a market cap of 341.65M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BCOMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BCOMF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BCOMF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to BCOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HCHC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.35M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LICT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LICT has a market cap of 253.28M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LICT trades at $13,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LICT's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LICT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ATNI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 238.29M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ATNI trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ASEJF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ASEJF has a market cap of 204.29M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ASEJF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ASEJF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ASEJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ASEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RDCM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 202.13M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RDCM trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FNGR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 199.99M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FNGR trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 195.00M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TV trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CXDO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 163.73M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CXDO trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 94.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VEON Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 132.31M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VEON trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MTSL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 91.96M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs NWTT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, NWTT has a market cap of 90.62M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while NWTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NWTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to NWTT's ROE of +4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to NWTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FSGHF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FSGHF has a market cap of 68.74M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FSGHF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FSGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FSGHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FSGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs NUVR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, NUVR has a market cap of 53.85M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while NUVR trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NUVR's P/E ratio is -12.09. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to NUVR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to NUVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 53.57M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDI trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TOWTF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TOWTF has a market cap of 51.69M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TOWTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TOWTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TOWTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TOWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs KORE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 43.24M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while KORE trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to KORE's ROE of +2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VPLM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VPLM has a market cap of 29.48M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VPLM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VPLM's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VPLM's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VPLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TRAGF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TRAGF has a market cap of 19.64M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TRAGF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TRAGF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TRAGF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TRAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LLEIF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LLEIF has a market cap of 13.58M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LLEIF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LLEIF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LLEIF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LLEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IRIDQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IRIDQ has a market cap of 13.42M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IRIDQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IRIDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IRIDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to IRIDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ANTE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ANTE trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PCLA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 11.85M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PCLA trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PCLA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs KTEL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, KTEL has a market cap of 11.75M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while KTEL trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KTEL's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to KTEL's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to KTEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IGLDF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IGLDF has a market cap of 9.53M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IGLDF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IGLDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IGLDF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to IGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MIMO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.43M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SPMMF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SPMMF has a market cap of 7.18M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SPMMF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SPMMF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SPMMF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SPMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs USSHF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, USSHF has a market cap of 6.50M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while USSHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas USSHF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to USSHF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to USSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TGRP Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TGRP has a market cap of 6.44M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TGRP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TGRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TGRP's ROE of +7.61%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PTEL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PTEL has a market cap of 5.97M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PTEL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PTEL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PTEL's ROE of +108.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to PTEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLLYF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLLYF has a market cap of 5.76M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLLYF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLLYF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLLYF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FULO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FULO has a market cap of 5.71M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FULO trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FULO's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FULO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FULO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs RDAR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, RDAR has a market cap of 5.10M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while RDAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas RDAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RDAR's ROE of +2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to RDAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs QTEK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs QTEKW Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UCL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 4.40M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UCL trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SGRB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SGRB has a market cap of 3.78M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SGRB trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SGRB's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SGRB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SGRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UCCPF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, UCCPF has a market cap of 3.55M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UCCPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UCCPF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UCCPF's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UCCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TAPP Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TAPP has a market cap of 2.85M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TAPP trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TAPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IMTO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IMTO has a market cap of 2.58M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IMTO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IMTO's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IMTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to IMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs HMMR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, HMMR has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while HMMR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HMMR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HMMR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to HMMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs OIBZQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, OIBZQ has a market cap of 2.06M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while OIBZQ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas OIBZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to OIBZQ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to OIBZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CPROF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CPROF has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CPROF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CPROF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CPROF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CPROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs DTGI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, DTGI has a market cap of 1.85M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while DTGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas DTGI's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to DTGI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to DTGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs WWRL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, WWRL has a market cap of 1.79M. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while WWRL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas WWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to WWRL's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to WWRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ARTM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ARTM has a market cap of 857625.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ARTM trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ARTM's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ARTM's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ARTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs QBAN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, QBAN has a market cap of 718819.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while QBAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas QBAN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QBAN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to QBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FRTN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FRTN has a market cap of 697884.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FRTN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FRTN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FRTN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ABWN Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ABWN has a market cap of 486269.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ABWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ABWN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ABWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to ABWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ACCR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ACCR has a market cap of 391950.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ACCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ACCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ACCR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ACCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SITOQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SITOQ has a market cap of 260081.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SITOQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SITOQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SITOQ's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SITOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLLEQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLLEQ has a market cap of 226654.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLLEQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLLEQ's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLLEQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TLLEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AFFU Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AFFU has a market cap of 186550.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AFFU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AFFU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AFFU's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to AFFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MDGC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MDGC has a market cap of 149596.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MDGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MDGC's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MDGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MDGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AXLX Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AXLX has a market cap of 114505.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AXLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AXLX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AXLX's ROE of +13.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to AXLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ALVRQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ALVRQ has a market cap of 87064.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ALVRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ALVRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ALVRQ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to ALVRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PHRZF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PHRZF has a market cap of 82182.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PHRZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PHRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PHRZF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to PHRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs OIBRQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, OIBRQ has a market cap of 78041.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while OIBRQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas OIBRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to OIBRQ's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to OIBRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs STRYQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, STRYQ has a market cap of 50133.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while STRYQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas STRYQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to STRYQ's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to STRYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MIMOQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MIMOQ has a market cap of 44783.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MIMOQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MIMOQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MIMOQ's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MIMOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TMXLF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TMXLF has a market cap of 30816.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TMXLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TMXLF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TMXLF's ROE of +8.67%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TMXLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs BZTG Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, BZTG has a market cap of 30000.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while BZTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BZTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to BZTG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to BZTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs NTLK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, NTLK has a market cap of 29994.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while NTLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NTLK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to NTLK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to NTLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CWTC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CWTC has a market cap of 29906.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CWTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CWTC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CWTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CWTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs STCO Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, STCO has a market cap of 21686.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while STCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas STCO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to STCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to STCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UVCL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, UVCL has a market cap of 19925.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UVCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UVCL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UVCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to UVCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CWIR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CWIR has a market cap of 19542.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CWIR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CWIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CWIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to CWIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs QNXC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, QNXC has a market cap of 19505.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while QNXC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas QNXC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QNXC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to QNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TVCE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TVCE has a market cap of 15618.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TVCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TVCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TVCE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TVCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CELX Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CELX has a market cap of 14478.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CELX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CELX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CELX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to CELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GZIC Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, GZIC has a market cap of 13396.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GZIC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GZIC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GZIC's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to GZIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs NPNTQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, NPNTQ has a market cap of 13345.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while NPNTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NPNTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to NPNTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to NPNTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UAMA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, UAMA has a market cap of 11457.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UAMA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UAMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UAMA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to UAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs WWII Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, WWII has a market cap of 10296.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while WWII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas WWII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to WWII's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to WWII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FRMB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FRMB has a market cap of 9462.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FRMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FRMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FRMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs WOWI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, WOWI has a market cap of 5404.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while WOWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas WOWI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to WOWI's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to WOWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CVST Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CVST has a market cap of 5347.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CVST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CVST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CVST's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VSRV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VSRV has a market cap of 4834.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VSRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VSRV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VSRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to VSRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TWER Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TWER has a market cap of 3940.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TWER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TWER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TWER's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TWER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs QOWI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, QOWI has a market cap of 3200.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while QOWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas QOWI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QOWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to QOWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs COMS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, COMS has a market cap of 2695.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while COMS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas COMS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to COMS's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to COMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AVNE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AVNE has a market cap of 2348.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AVNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AVNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AVNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to AVNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VIZG Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VIZG has a market cap of 2309.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VIZG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VIZG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VIZG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to VIZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs WQNI Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, WQNI has a market cap of 2207.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while WQNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas WQNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to WQNI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to WQNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs VSTCQ Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, VSTCQ has a market cap of 2097.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while VSTCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VSTCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VSTCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to VSTCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs FUIG Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, FUIG has a market cap of 1787.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while FUIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FUIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FUIG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to FUIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ASGXF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ASGXF has a market cap of 685.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ASGXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ASGXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ASGXF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to ASGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs COMSP Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SPDE Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SPDE has a market cap of 416.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SPDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SPDE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SPDE's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to SPDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs IPKL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, IPKL has a market cap of 365.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while IPKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IPKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IPKL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to IPKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs COMSW Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AQIS Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AQIS has a market cap of 180.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AQIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AQIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AQIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AQIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLFX Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLFX has a market cap of 98.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ALMY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ALMY has a market cap of 53.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ALMY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ALMY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ALMY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ALMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs SNLM Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, SNLM has a market cap of 31.00. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while SNLM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SNLM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to SNLM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to SNLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs AVSA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, AVSA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while AVSA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AVSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to AVSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to AVSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs WFWRF Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, WFWRF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while WFWRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas WFWRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to WFWRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to WFWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TLSYY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TLSYY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TLSYY trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TLSYY's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TLSYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TLSYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LBYAV Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LBYAV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs LORL Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, LORL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TIGOR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TIGOR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs GTT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, GTT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs STRY Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, STRY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs UZA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, UZA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs MIMO-WT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, MIMO-WT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs CBB Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, CBB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs ALSK Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, ALSK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs TDA Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, TDA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs PTNR Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, PTNR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
OIBR-C vs INVT Comparison
OIBR-C plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OIBR-C stands at N/A. In comparison, INVT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OIBR-C is priced at $0.81, while INVT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OIBR-C currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas INVT's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, OIBR-C's ROE is -0.83%, compared to INVT's ROE of -11.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OIBR-C is more volatile compared to INVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OIBR-C.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXTLF | $0.10 | N/A | 28.57T | -11.11 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| TMUS | $243.81 | -1.49% | 276.83B | 23.79 | $10.25 | +1.25% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.26B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TBB | $22.55 | -0.17% | 201.86B | 4.40 | $5.12 | +5.93% |
| T | $27.84 | +1.33% | 200.29B | 17.08 | $1.63 | +3.98% |
| VZ | $43.61 | +0.00% | 183.87B | 10.38 | $4.20 | +6.18% |
| DTEGF | $36.84 | +5.74% | 180.53B | 14.33 | $2.57 | +3.08% |
| CHWRF | $1.85 | N/A | 180.15B | 23.13 | $0.08 | +0.37% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.83B | N/A | N/A | +4.22% |
| DTEGY | $36.36 | +1.54% | 179.06B | 14.15 | $2.57 | +2.91% |