Oriental Carbon & Chemicals Limited
Oriental Carbon & Chemicals Limited (OCCL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OCCL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCCL.NS | ₹233.34 | +0.19% | 2.3B | 77.52 | ₹3.01 | N/A |
| UPL.BO | ₹629.20 | -16.30% | 544.2B | 30.74 | ₹20.97 | +0.93% |
| FLUOROCHEM.NS | ₹3,534.40 | +3.17% | 384.2B | 58.68 | ₹59.61 | +0.09% |
| NAVINFLUOR.BO | ₹6,321.00 | -3.13% | 340.9B | 61.41 | ₹108.32 | +0.20% |
| NAVINFLUOR.NS | ₹6,327.00 | -3.05% | 340.7B | 61.38 | ₹108.33 | +0.20% |
| DEEPAKNI.BO | ₹2,436.10 | +0.33% | 332.3B | 57.46 | ₹42.40 | N/A |
| DEEPAKNTR.NS | ₹1,589.00 | -0.94% | 220.5B | 41.42 | ₹39.03 | +0.46% |
| DEEPAKNTR.BO | ₹1,587.85 | -1.00% | 220.4B | 41.29 | ₹39.14 | +0.46% |
| BAYERCROP.BO | ₹4,708.30 | -1.91% | 215.2B | 32.08 | ₹149.28 | +2.61% |
| TATACHEM.NS | ₹709.15 | -0.97% | 182B | 112.16 | ₹6.37 | +1.54% |
Stock Comparison
OCCL.NS vs UPL.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, UPL.BO has a market cap of 544.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while UPL.BO trades at ₹629.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas UPL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UPL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to UPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check UPL.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs FLUOROCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.NS has a market cap of 384.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while FLUOROCHEM.NS trades at ₹3,534.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas FLUOROCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 58.68. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check FLUOROCHEM.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs NAVINFLUOR.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.BO has a market cap of 340.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while NAVINFLUOR.BO trades at ₹6,321.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas NAVINFLUOR.BO's P/E ratio is 61.41. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check NAVINFLUOR.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs NAVINFLUOR.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.NS has a market cap of 340.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while NAVINFLUOR.NS trades at ₹6,327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas NAVINFLUOR.NS's P/E ratio is 61.38. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check NAVINFLUOR.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DEEPAKNI.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKNI.BO has a market cap of 332.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DEEPAKNI.BO trades at ₹2,436.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DEEPAKNI.BO's P/E ratio is 57.46. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEEPAKNI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKNI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DEEPAKNI.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DEEPAKNTR.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.NS has a market cap of 220.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DEEPAKNTR.NS trades at ₹1,589.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DEEPAKNTR.NS's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DEEPAKNTR.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DEEPAKNTR.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.BO has a market cap of 220.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DEEPAKNTR.BO trades at ₹1,587.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DEEPAKNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DEEPAKNTR.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs BAYERCROP.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 215.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,708.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs TATACHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TATACHEM.NS has a market cap of 182B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while TATACHEM.NS trades at ₹709.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas TATACHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 112.16. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TATACHEM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to TATACHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check TATACHEM.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs TATACHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TATACHEM.BO has a market cap of 181.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while TATACHEM.BO trades at ₹707.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas TATACHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 111.75. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TATACHEM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to TATACHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check TATACHEM.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DEEPAKFERT.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.NS has a market cap of 126.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DEEPAKFERT.NS trades at ₹993.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DEEPAKFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DEEPAKFERT.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DEEPAKFERT.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.BO has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DEEPAKFERT.BO trades at ₹990.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DEEPAKFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DEEPAKFERT.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs SPLPETRO.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.NS has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while SPLPETRO.NS trades at ₹649.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas SPLPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 44.73. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPLPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to SPLPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check SPLPETRO.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ACI.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ACI.NS has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ACI.NS trades at ₹574.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ACI.NS's P/E ratio is 47.39. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ACI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ACI.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ACI.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ACI.BO has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ACI.BO trades at ₹562.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ACI.BO's P/E ratio is 47.51. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ACI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ACI.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GNFC.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GNFC.BO has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GNFC.BO trades at ₹456.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GNFC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNFC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GNFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GNFC.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GNFC.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GNFC.NS has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GNFC.NS trades at ₹457.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GNFC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNFC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GNFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GNFC.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs INDIAGLYCO.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.BO has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while INDIAGLYCO.BO trades at ₹927.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas INDIAGLYCO.BO's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check INDIAGLYCO.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs INDIAGLYCO.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.NS has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while INDIAGLYCO.NS trades at ₹929.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas INDIAGLYCO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check INDIAGLYCO.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs RAIN.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RAIN.BO has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while RAIN.BO trades at ₹145.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas RAIN.BO's P/E ratio is -37.38. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to RAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check RAIN.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs RAIN.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RAIN.NS has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while RAIN.NS trades at ₹146.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas RAIN.NS's P/E ratio is -37.43. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to RAIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check RAIN.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GHCL.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GHCL.BO has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GHCL.BO trades at ₹491.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GHCL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GHCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GHCL.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GHCL.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GHCL.NS has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GHCL.NS trades at ₹491.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GHCL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GHCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GHCL.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs MFL.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MFL.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while MFL.NS trades at ₹1,062.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas MFL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MFL.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to MFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check MFL.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs CHEMPLASTS.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.BO has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while CHEMPLASTS.BO trades at ₹262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas CHEMPLASTS.BO's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check CHEMPLASTS.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs CHEMPLASTS.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.NS has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while CHEMPLASTS.NS trades at ₹260.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas CHEMPLASTS.NS's P/E ratio is -15.09. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check CHEMPLASTS.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs EPIGRAL.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.NS has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while EPIGRAL.NS trades at ₹941.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas EPIGRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPIGRAL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to EPIGRAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check EPIGRAL.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs EPIGRAL.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.BO has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while EPIGRAL.BO trades at ₹939.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas EPIGRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPIGRAL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to EPIGRAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check EPIGRAL.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GUJALKALI.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.NS has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GUJALKALI.NS trades at ₹474.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GUJALKALI.NS's P/E ratio is -422.37. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GUJALKALI.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GUJALKALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GUJALKALI.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GUJALKALI.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GUJALKALI.BO trades at ₹473.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GUJALKALI.BO's P/E ratio is -422.24. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GUJALKALI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GUJALKALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GUJALKALI.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs MEGH.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MEGH.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while MEGH.NS trades at ₹139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas MEGH.NS's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MEGH.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to MEGH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check MEGH.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs STYRENIX.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, STYRENIX.BO has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while STYRENIX.BO trades at ₹1,919.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas STYRENIX.BO's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STYRENIX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to STYRENIX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check STYRENIX.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs STYRENIX.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, STYRENIX.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while STYRENIX.NS trades at ₹1,918.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas STYRENIX.NS's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STYRENIX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to STYRENIX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check STYRENIX.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ELLEN.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ELLEN.NS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ELLEN.NS trades at ₹238.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ELLEN.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELLEN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ELLEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ELLEN.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs RPEL.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RPEL.BO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while RPEL.BO trades at ₹711.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas RPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 64.55. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPEL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to RPEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check RPEL.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs RPEL.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RPEL.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while RPEL.NS trades at ₹713.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas RPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 66.16. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to RPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check RPEL.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs FOSECOIND.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while FOSECOIND.NS trades at ₹4,699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas FOSECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FOSECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to FOSECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check FOSECOIND.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs FOSECOIND.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.BO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while FOSECOIND.BO trades at ₹4,705.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas FOSECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FOSECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to FOSECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check FOSECOIND.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DDEVPLASTIK.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DDEVPLASTIK.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DDEVPLASTIK.BO trades at ₹262.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DDEVPLASTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DDEVPLASTIK.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs BEPL.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BEPL.NS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while BEPL.NS trades at ₹82.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas BEPL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BEPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to BEPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check BEPL.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs BEPL.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BEPL.BO has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while BEPL.BO trades at ₹82.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas BEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BEPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to BEPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check BEPL.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs SANSTAR.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SANSTAR.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while SANSTAR.NS trades at ₹86.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas SANSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 82.51. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SANSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to SANSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check SANSTAR.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DCW.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DCW.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DCW.BO trades at ₹48.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DCW.BO's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCW.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DCW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DCW.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DCW.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DCW.NS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DCW.NS trades at ₹48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DCW.NS's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DCW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DCW.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GODAVARIB.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GODAVARIB.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GODAVARIB.NS trades at ₹271.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GODAVARIB.NS's P/E ratio is 71.46. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GODAVARIB.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GODAVARIB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GODAVARIB.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs INEOSSTYRO.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INEOSSTYRO.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while INEOSSTYRO.NS trades at ₹807.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas INEOSSTYRO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check INEOSSTYRO.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs PUNJABCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while PUNJABCHEM.NS trades at ₹1,041.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas PUNJABCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check PUNJABCHEM.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs PUNJABCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while PUNJABCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,037.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas PUNJABCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check PUNJABCHEM.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs IGPL.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IGPL.BO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while IGPL.BO trades at ₹369.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas IGPL.BO's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IGPL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to IGPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check IGPL.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs A1L.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, A1L.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while A1L.BO trades at ₹21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas A1L.BO's P/E ratio is 287.38. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to A1L.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to A1L.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check A1L.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GEMAROMA.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GEMAROMA.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GEMAROMA.NS trades at ₹191.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GEMAROMA.NS's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEMAROMA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GEMAROMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GEMAROMA.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ANDHRSUGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ANDHRSUGAR.BO trades at ₹70.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ANDHRSUGAR.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ANDHRSUGAR.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ANDHRSUGAR.NS trades at ₹71.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ANDHRSUGAR.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GULPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GULPOLY.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GULPOLY.NS trades at ₹152.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GULPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GULPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GULPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GULPOLY.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GULPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GULPOLY.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GULPOLY.BO trades at ₹152.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GULPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GULPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to GULPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check GULPOLY.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ZUARI.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs AMNPLST.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AMNPLST.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while AMNPLST.NS trades at ₹161.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas AMNPLST.NS's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMNPLST.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to AMNPLST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check AMNPLST.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs AMNPLST.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AMNPLST.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while AMNPLST.BO trades at ₹162.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas AMNPLST.BO's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMNPLST.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS and AMNPLST.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMNPLST.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs INDOAMIN.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while INDOAMIN.BO trades at ₹108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas INDOAMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOAMIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOAMIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check INDOAMIN.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs INDOAMIN.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while INDOAMIN.NS trades at ₹109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas INDOAMIN.NS's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOAMIN.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOAMIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check INDOAMIN.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs SRHHYPOLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while SRHHYPOLTD.BO trades at ₹472.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check SRHHYPOLTD.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs SRHHYPOLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while SRHHYPOLTD.NS trades at ₹473.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check SRHHYPOLTD.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ORIENTCQ.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ORIENTCQ.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ORIENTCQ.BO trades at ₹810.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ORIENTCQ.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ORIENTCQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTCQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ORIENTCQ.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs INDOBORAX.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while INDOBORAX.NS trades at ₹243.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas INDOBORAX.NS's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOBORAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOBORAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check INDOBORAX.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs INDOBORAX.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while INDOBORAX.BO trades at ₹242.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas INDOBORAX.BO's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOBORAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOBORAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check INDOBORAX.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs UNIENTER.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, UNIENTER.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while UNIENTER.NS trades at ₹107.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas UNIENTER.NS's P/E ratio is 38.29. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNIENTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to UNIENTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check UNIENTER.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs VALIANTORG.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while VALIANTORG.NS trades at ₹236.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas VALIANTORG.NS's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VALIANTORG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check VALIANTORG.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs VALIANTORG.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while VALIANTORG.BO trades at ₹235.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas VALIANTORG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VALIANTORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check VALIANTORG.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs SUNSHIEL.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SUNSHIEL.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while SUNSHIEL.BO trades at ₹840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas SUNSHIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUNSHIEL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNSHIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check SUNSHIEL.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs NATPEROX.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NATPEROX.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while NATPEROX.BO trades at ₹1,040.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas NATPEROX.BO's P/E ratio is 399.75. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NATPEROX.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to NATPEROX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check NATPEROX.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DMCC.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DMCC.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DMCC.BO trades at ₹219.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DMCC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DMCC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DMCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DMCC.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DMCC.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DMCC.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DMCC.NS trades at ₹218.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DMCC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DMCC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DMCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DMCC.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs PRIMO.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PRIMO.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while PRIMO.NS trades at ₹20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas PRIMO.NS's P/E ratio is 62.75. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRIMO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check PRIMO.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs SHIVALIK.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SHIVALIK.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while SHIVALIK.BO trades at ₹282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas SHIVALIK.BO's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHIVALIK.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVALIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check SHIVALIK.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs OCCLLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OCCLLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while OCCLLTD.NS trades at ₹89.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas OCCLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCCLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to OCCLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check OCCLLTD.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ARIES.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹339.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ARIES.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs NAPEROL.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NAPEROL.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while NAPEROL.BO trades at ₹626.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas NAPEROL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAPEROL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to NAPEROL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check NAPEROL.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs KANORICHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while KANORICHEM.BO trades at ₹77.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas KANORICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KANORICHEM.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to KANORICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check KANORICHEM.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs KANORICHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while KANORICHEM.NS trades at ₹72.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas KANORICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KANORICHEM.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to KANORICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check KANORICHEM.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DCMSRMIND.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DCMSRMIND.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DCMSRMIND.BO trades at ₹175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DCMSRMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCMSRMIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSRMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DCMSRMIND.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs LORDSCHLO.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while LORDSCHLO.BO trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas LORDSCHLO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LORDSCHLO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check LORDSCHLO.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs LORDSCHLO.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while LORDSCHLO.NS trades at ₹117.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas LORDSCHLO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LORDSCHLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check LORDSCHLO.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs INDGELA.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INDGELA.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while INDGELA.BO trades at ₹346.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas INDGELA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDGELA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to INDGELA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check INDGELA.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DIAMINESQ.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DIAMINESQ.BO trades at ₹231.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DIAMINESQ.BO's P/E ratio is -46.08. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIAMINESQ.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DIAMINESQ.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DIAMINESQ.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DIAMINESQ.NS trades at ₹235.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DIAMINESQ.NS's P/E ratio is -46.07. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIAMINESQ.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DIAMINESQ.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs JAYSYNTH.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, JAYSYNTH.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while JAYSYNTH.BO trades at ₹12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas JAYSYNTH.BO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JAYSYNTH.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to JAYSYNTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check JAYSYNTH.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ISHANCH.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ISHANCH.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ISHANCH.NS trades at ₹61.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ISHANCH.NS's P/E ratio is -30.02. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ISHANCH.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ISHANCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ISHANCH.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs PAUSHAKLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PAUSHAKLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while PAUSHAKLTD.BO trades at ₹481.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas PAUSHAKLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check PAUSHAKLTD.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs CHEMCRUX.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CHEMCRUX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while CHEMCRUX.BO trades at ₹98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas CHEMCRUX.BO's P/E ratio is 70.60. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHEMCRUX.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to CHEMCRUX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check CHEMCRUX.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs RESGEN.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RESGEN.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while RESGEN.BO trades at ₹59.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas RESGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RESGEN.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to RESGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check RESGEN.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs DEEPAKCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKCHEM.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while DEEPAKCHEM.BO trades at ₹101.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas DEEPAKCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check DEEPAKCHEM.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs POLYCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, POLYCHEM.BO has a market cap of 796.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while POLYCHEM.BO trades at ₹2,099.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas POLYCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POLYCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to POLYCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check POLYCHEM.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ASHOKALC.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ASHOKALC.BO has a market cap of 551.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ASHOKALC.BO trades at ₹119.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ASHOKALC.BO's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASHOKALC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKALC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ASHOKALC.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs ZR2.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZR2.BO has a market cap of 541.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while ZR2.BO trades at ₹143.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas ZR2.BO's P/E ratio is 1011.33. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZR2.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to ZR2.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check ZR2.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs GARODCH.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GARODCH.BO has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while GARODCH.BO trades at ₹138.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas GARODCH.BO's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GARODCH.BO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS and GARODCH.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GARODCH.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs SANGINITA.NS Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SANGINITA.NS has a market cap of 395M. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while SANGINITA.NS trades at ₹14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas SANGINITA.NS's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SANGINITA.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to SANGINITA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check SANGINITA.NS's competition here
OCCL.NS vs SHIVAAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SHIVAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 346.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while SHIVAAGRO.BO trades at ₹39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas SHIVAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 157.55. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check SHIVAAGRO.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs CAPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CAPRO.BO has a market cap of 334M. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while CAPRO.BO trades at ₹72.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas CAPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 7261.00. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAPRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to CAPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check CAPRO.BO's competition here
OCCL.NS vs VINEETLAB.BO Comparison February 2026
OCCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCCL.NS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VINEETLAB.BO has a market cap of 299.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCCL.NS is priced at ₹233.34, while VINEETLAB.BO trades at ₹30.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 77.52, whereas VINEETLAB.BO's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, OCCL.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VINEETLAB.BO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OCCL.NS is less volatile compared to VINEETLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCCL.NS.Check VINEETLAB.BO's competition here