American Strategic Investment Co.
American Strategic Investment Co. (NYC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NYC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYC | $9.14 | +0.00% | 23M | -1.09 | -$7.86 | N/A |
| DLR | $176.90 | +0.00% | 60.4B | 49.06 | $3.58 | +2.77% |
| DLR-PK | $24.21 | -0.01% | 57.5B | 5.02 | $4.83 | +2.77% |
| BXP | $62.22 | +0.00% | 9.7B | 35.00 | $1.74 | +5.46% |
| ARE | $53.40 | +0.01% | 9.3B | -6.36 | -$8.44 | +8.73% |
| VNO-PL | $18.42 | +0.00% | 7.4B | 28.65 | $0.64 | +2.56% |
| VNO-PM | $17.94 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 27.90 | $0.64 | +2.56% |
| DLR-PL | $20.95 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 4.34 | $4.83 | +2.77% |
| HPP-PC | $14.95 | -0.27% | 5.7B | -120.32 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VNO | $29.38 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 6.92 | $4.20 | +2.56% |
Stock Comparison
NYC vs DLR Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while DLR trades at $176.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 49.06. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DLR's competition here
NYC vs DLR-PK Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while DLR-PK trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DLR-PK's competition here
NYC vs BXP Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while BXP trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check BXP's competition here
NYC vs ARE Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while ARE trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ARE's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PL Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while VNO-PL trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PL's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PM Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while VNO-PM trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PM's competition here
NYC vs DLR-PL Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while DLR-PL trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DLR-PL's competition here
NYC vs HPP-PC Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while HPP-PC trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -120.32. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check HPP-PC's competition here
NYC vs VNO Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while VNO trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO's competition here
NYC vs SLG-PI Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while SLG-PI trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check SLG-PI's competition here
NYC vs CUZ Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while CUZ trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 99.83. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CUZ's competition here
NYC vs KRC Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while KRC trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check KRC's competition here
NYC vs CDP Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while CDP trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CDP's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PN Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while VNO-PN trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PN's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PO Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while VNO-PO trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PO's competition here
NYC vs SLG Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while SLG trades at $39.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check SLG's competition here
NYC vs HIW Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while HIW trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check HIW's competition here
NYC vs CLI Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CLI's competition here
NYC vs DEI Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while DEI trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 116.28. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DEI's competition here
NYC vs OGCP Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while OGCP trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OGCP's competition here
NYC vs FISK Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while FISK trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check FISK's competition here
NYC vs ESBA Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while ESBA trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ESBA's competition here
NYC vs WRE Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check WRE's competition here
NYC vs PGRE Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PGRE's competition here
NYC vs DEA Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while DEA trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 80.47. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DEA's competition here
NYC vs PDM Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while PDM trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PDM's competition here
NYC vs JBGS Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 928M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while JBGS trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check JBGS's competition here
NYC vs CXP Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CXP's competition here
NYC vs PSTL Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 641.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while PSTL trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 39.09. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PSTL's competition here
NYC vs BDN Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while BDN trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check BDN's competition here
NYC vs HPP Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 345.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while HPP trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check HPP's competition here
NYC vs CIO-PA Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CIO-PA's competition here
NYC vs CIO Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CIO's competition here
NYC vs OPINL Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OPINL's competition here
NYC vs NLOP Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while NLOP trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check NLOP's competition here
NYC vs ELME Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while ELME trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ELME's competition here
NYC vs EQC Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EQC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check EQC's competition here
NYC vs ONL Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while ONL trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ONL's competition here
NYC vs FSP Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while FSP trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check FSP's competition here
NYC vs OPI Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OPI's competition here
NYC vs CMCT Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while CMCT trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CMCT's competition here
NYC vs EQC-PD Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check EQC-PD's competition here
NYC vs OFC Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OFC's competition here
NYC vs DTLA-P Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DTLA-P's competition here
NYC vs CMCTP Comparison February 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 23M. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $9.14, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.09, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CMCTP's competition here