Newell Brands Inc.
Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWL | $4.64 | -4.92% | 1.9B | -6.82 | -$0.68 | +6.02% |
| PG | $165.17 | +2.73% | 385.9B | 24.47 | $6.75 | +2.56% |
| UL | $73.98 | +1.02% | 161.8B | 24.02 | $3.08 | +3.10% |
| CL | $97.10 | +2.11% | 78.3B | 36.91 | $2.63 | +2.14% |
| EL | $113.02 | -1.06% | 40.8B | -221.56 | -$0.51 | +1.23% |
| KMB | $110.51 | +1.37% | 36.7B | 22.74 | $4.86 | +4.57% |
| KVUE | $18.95 | +1.23% | 36.3B | 24.94 | $0.76 | +4.37% |
| CHD | $105.26 | +2.11% | 25.3B | 34.85 | $3.02 | +1.13% |
| SGI | $87.05 | -4.55% | 18.3B | 55.43 | $1.57 | +0.69% |
| CLX | $126.76 | +2.56% | 15.5B | 20.75 | $6.11 | +3.90% |
Stock Comparison
NWL vs PG Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 385.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while PG trades at $165.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PG's competition here
NWL vs UL Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while UL trades at $73.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check UL's competition here
NWL vs CL Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while CL trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CL's competition here
NWL vs EL Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while EL trades at $113.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -221.56. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EL's competition here
NWL vs KMB Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while KMB trades at $110.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check KMB's competition here
NWL vs KVUE Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while KVUE trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check KVUE's competition here
NWL vs CHD Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while CHD trades at $105.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CHD's competition here
NWL vs SGI Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while SGI trades at $87.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 55.43. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SGI's competition here
NWL vs CLX Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while CLX trades at $126.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLX's ROE of +15.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CLX's competition here
NWL vs ELF Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while ELF trades at $90.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 50.88. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check ELF's competition here
NWL vs NTCO Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check NTCO's competition here
NWL vs IPAR Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while IPAR trades at $101.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check IPAR's competition here
NWL vs COTY Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while COTY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check COTY's competition here
NWL vs SPB Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while SPB trades at $78.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SPB's competition here
NWL vs EPC Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while EPC trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 203.18. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EPC's competition here
NWL vs NUS Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while NUS trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check NUS's competition here
NWL vs HELE Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while HELE trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check HELE's competition here
NWL vs EWCZ Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 312.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while EWCZ trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EWCZ's competition here
NWL vs PTNM Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PTNM's competition here
NWL vs ACU Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while ACU trades at $43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check ACU's competition here
NWL vs SKIN Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while SKIN trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SKIN's competition here
NWL vs SLSN Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while SLSN trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 117.99. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SLSN's competition here
NWL vs GROV Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while GROV trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check GROV's competition here
NWL vs AXIL Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while AXIL trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check AXIL's competition here
NWL vs UG Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while UG trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check UG's competition here
NWL vs DSY Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while DSY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check DSY's competition here
NWL vs MTEX Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while MTEX trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check MTEX's competition here
NWL vs RAY Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while RAY trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check RAY's competition here
NWL vs PHH Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PHH's competition here
NWL vs BRSH Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check BRSH's competition here
NWL vs TANH Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while TANH trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check TANH's competition here
NWL vs TKLF Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while TKLF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check TKLF's competition here
NWL vs BRSHW Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check BRSHW's competition here
NWL vs SUMR Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SUMR's competition here
NWL vs REV Comparison February 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.64, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check REV's competition here