Nova LifeStyle, Inc.
Nova LifeStyle, Inc. (NVFY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NVFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVFY | $2.20 | +21.21% | 25.1M | -2.12 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| SN | $114.16 | -1.64% | 16.1B | 31.41 | $3.66 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.85% |
| MHK | $121.18 | +0.47% | 7.4B | 15.92 | $7.53 | N/A |
| WHR | $82.92 | -0.94% | 4.6B | -30.82 | -$2.67 | +8.35% |
| PATK | $102.50 | +2.12% | 3.4B | 28.00 | $3.68 | +1.55% |
| MBC | $12.38 | +3.95% | 1.6B | 16.33 | $0.72 | N/A |
| LZB | $36.69 | +1.38% | 1.5B | 15.62 | $2.35 | +2.37% |
| TILE | $25.71 | +3.38% | 1.5B | 15.38 | $1.62 | +0.16% |
| MLKN | $19.78 | -0.70% | 1.4B | -37.13 | -$0.54 | +3.75% |
Stock Comparison
NVFY vs SN Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while SN trades at $114.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check SN's competition here
NVFY vs TPX Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check TPX's competition here
NVFY vs MHK Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while MHK trades at $121.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check MHK's competition here
NVFY vs WHR Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while WHR trades at $82.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is -30.82. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to WHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check WHR's competition here
NVFY vs PATK Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while PATK trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check PATK's competition here
NVFY vs MBC Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while MBC trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check MBC's competition here
NVFY vs LZB Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while LZB trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check LZB's competition here
NVFY vs TILE Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while TILE trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check TILE's competition here
NVFY vs MLKN Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while MLKN trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is -37.13. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to MLKN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check MLKN's competition here
NVFY vs LEG Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while LEG trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check LEG's competition here
NVFY vs AMWD Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 866.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while AMWD trades at $62.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check AMWD's competition here
NVFY vs ETD Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 749.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while ETD trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check ETD's competition here
NVFY vs LOVE Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 258.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while LOVE trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check LOVE's competition here
NVFY vs VIOT Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 236M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while VIOT trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check VIOT's competition here
NVFY vs SNBR Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 198.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while SNBR trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check SNBR's competition here
NVFY vs COOK Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while COOK trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check COOK's competition here
NVFY vs HBB Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while HBB trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check HBB's competition here
NVFY vs FLXS Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while FLXS trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check FLXS's competition here
NVFY vs KEQU Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while KEQU trades at $53.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check KEQU's competition here
NVFY vs BSET Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while BSET trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check BSET's competition here
NVFY vs VIRC Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while VIRC trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check VIRC's competition here
NVFY vs IRBT Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while IRBT trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check IRBT's competition here
NVFY vs HOFT Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while HOFT trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check HOFT's competition here
NVFY vs PRPL Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while PRPL trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -9.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check PRPL's competition here
NVFY vs LCUT Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while LCUT trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check LCUT's competition here
NVFY vs NTZ Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while NTZ trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check NTZ's competition here
NVFY vs CRWS Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while CRWS trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check CRWS's competition here
NVFY vs NCL Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while NCL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to NCL's ROE of -3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check NCL's competition here
NVFY vs ATER Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while ATER trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check ATER's competition here
NVFY vs EFOI Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while EFOI trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check EFOI's competition here
NVFY vs FGI Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while FGI trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check FGI's competition here
NVFY vs AUVIP Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check AUVIP's competition here
NVFY vs AUVI Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check AUVI's competition here
NVFY vs FGIWW Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 62.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while FGIWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check FGIWW's competition here
NVFY vs WEBR Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check WEBR's competition here
NVFY vs KBAL Comparison August 2025
NVFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVFY stands at 25.1M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVFY is priced at $2.20, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVFY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, NVFY's ROE is -1.96%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVFY is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVFY.Check KBAL's competition here