Neste Oyj
Neste Oyj NTOIF Peers
See (NTOIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTOIF | $10.80 | +10.09% | 8.3B | -25.12 | -$0.43 | +9.33% |
| IRPSY | $9.15 | -7.95% | 186.8B | -7.69 | -$1.19 | +0.32% |
| PKCPY | $1.58 | +100.00% | 31.2B | 9.29 | $0.17 | +4.84% |
| JXHGF | $5.00 | +4.17% | 13.5B | 166.67 | $0.03 | +3.25% |
| JXHLY | $9.57 | +0.42% | 13.4B | 191.30 | $0.05 | +1.27% |
| KUNUF | $1.25 | N/A | 10.8B | 12.50 | $0.10 | +3.47% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTOIY | $5.40 | +0.75% | 8.3B | -25.69 | -$0.21 | +10.17% |
| KLYCY | $9.10 | -2.67% | 7.9B | 9.48 | $0.96 | +4.74% |
| IDKOF | $6.10 | N/A | 7.9B | 11.30 | $0.54 | +2.08% |
Stock Comparison
NTOIF vs IRPSY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 186.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while IRPSY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs PKCPY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while PKCPY trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and PKCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs JXHGF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while JXHGF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and JXHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs JXHLY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while JXHLY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 191.30. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs KUNUF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while KUNUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs SAAFY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs NTOIY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while NTOIY trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -25.69. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs KLYCY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while KLYCY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and KLYCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs IDKOF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while IDKOF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and IDKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs IDKOY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while IDKOY trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs DCCPF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while DCCPF trades at $61.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs DCCPY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while DCCPY trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs MOHCY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while MOHCY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs PKIUF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while PKIUF trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 35.32. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs PNADF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and PNADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs SHIIY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs CTXAY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while CTXAY trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 49.84. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs CTXAF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs RBSFY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while RBSFY trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and RBSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs RUBSF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while RUBSF trades at $33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs MOHCF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while MOHCF trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and MOHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs TOIPF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while TOIPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs TOIPY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while TOIPY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and TOIPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs FJLLF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and FJLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs OILRF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 746.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while OILRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and OILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs TPHIF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and TPHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs CAOLF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 474M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and CAOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs NZRFF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 471.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while NZRFF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and NZRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs FGPRB Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 225.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while FGPRB trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and FGPRB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs REGX Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and REGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs CLSZF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while CLSZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs FGPR Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while FGPR trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGPR's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs BDCO Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while BDCO trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs ISRJF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while ISRJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to ISRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs QREE Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while QREE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs LCNTU Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while LCNTU trades at $511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to LCNTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs SRNW Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while SRNW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs WTLC Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and WTLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs BERI Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 613.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while BERI trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs DVFI Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and DVFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs IAHL Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and IAHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs ABLE Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs TOAOF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and TOAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NTOIF vs LNKE Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.80, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.12, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and LNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).