Neste Oyj
Neste Oyj NTOIF Peers
See (NTOIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTOIF | $10.36 | N/A | 7.96B | -24.09 | -$0.43 | +9.45% |
| IRPSY | $9.15 | -7.95% | 186.76B | -12.04 | -$0.76 | +0.32% |
| PKCPY | $1.58 | +100.00% | 31.21B | 9.29 | $0.17 | +2.86% |
| JXHGF | $5.03 | +0.60% | 13.58B | 8.38 | $0.60 | +3.24% |
| JXHLY | $9.87 | +0.89% | 13.32B | 8.22 | $1.20 | +1.23% |
| IDKOF | $7.35 | N/A | 8.85B | 12.05 | $0.61 | +1.73% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.37B | 5.06 | $1.74 | +8.98% |
| KLYCY | $9.64 | +2.54% | 8.34B | 10.14 | $0.95 | +0.90% |
| KUNUF | $0.96 | N/A | 8.31B | 10.67 | $0.09 | +6.42% |
| NTOIY | $5.24 | +3.76% | 8.05B | -23.82 | -$0.22 | +8.29% |
Stock Comparison
NTOIF vs IRPSY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 186.76B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while IRPSY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs PKCPY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 31.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while PKCPY trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to PKCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs JXHGF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 13.58B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while JXHGF trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to JXHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs JXHLY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 13.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while JXHLY trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs IDKOF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while IDKOF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs SAAFY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs KLYCY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while KLYCY trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to KLYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs KUNUF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 8.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while KUNUF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs NTOIY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 8.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while NTOIY trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -23.82. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs IDKOY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while IDKOY trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs DCCPY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while DCCPY trades at $35.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs DCCPF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while DCCPF trades at $66.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs MOHCY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while MOHCY trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs PKIUF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while PKIUF trades at $28.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs PNADF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to PNADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs SHIIY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs CTXAF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs CTXAY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while CTXAY trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 48.86. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs RBSFY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while RBSFY trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs RUBSF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while RUBSF trades at $33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs MOHCF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while MOHCF trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs TOIPY Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while TOIPY trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to TOIPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs TOIPF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while TOIPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs FJLLF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to FJLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs OILRF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 808.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while OILRF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to OILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs TPHIF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to TPHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs CAOLF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 473.96M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to CAOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs NZRFF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 471.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while NZRFF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs FGPRB Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 208.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while FGPRB trades at $129.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs REGX Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to REGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs CLSZF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 140.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while CLSZF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs FGPR Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 42.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while FGPR trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGPR's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs BDCO Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 19.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while BDCO trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs ISRJF Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 18.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while ISRJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to ISRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs QREE Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while QREE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs LCNTU Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while LCNTU trades at $511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to LCNTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs SRNW Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 5.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while SRNW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs WTLC Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.87M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WTLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to WTLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs BERI Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 409248.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while BERI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs DVFI Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28091.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to DVFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs IAHL Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6500.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is more volatile compared to IAHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.
NTOIF vs ABLE Comparison
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 7.96B. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 3004.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $10.36, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.09, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.