The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTB | $44.95 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 8.81 | $4.96 | +4.15% |
| JPM-PC | $25.35 | +0.00% | 801.1B | 1.88 | $13.48 | +1.82% |
| JPM-PD | $24.87 | +0.00% | 799.9B | 1.84 | $13.48 | +1.82% |
| JPM | $294.16 | +0.00% | 798.9B | 14.91 | $19.49 | +1.82% |
| BAC-PL | $1,233.33 | +0.00% | 455B | 349.60 | $3.51 | +2.21% |
| BAC-PB | $25.16 | +0.00% | 351.9B | 7.17 | $3.51 | +2.21% |
| BAC-PE | $21.15 | +0.02% | 350.8B | 6.03 | $3.51 | +2.21% |
| BAC-PK | $24.76 | +0.00% | 350.2B | 7.04 | $3.51 | +2.21% |
| BML-PL | $20.67 | +0.00% | 350.1B | 5.88 | $3.51 | +2.21% |
| BAC | $47.71 | +0.00% | 347.8B | 13.77 | $3.41 | +2.21% |
Stock Comparison
NTB vs JPM-PC Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 801.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while JPM-PC trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check JPM-PC's competition here
NTB vs JPM-PD Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 799.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while JPM-PD trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check JPM-PD's competition here
NTB vs JPM Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 798.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while JPM trades at $294.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check JPM's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PL Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 455B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PL trades at $1,233.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 349.60. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PL's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PB Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 351.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PB trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PB's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PE Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 350.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PE trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PE's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PK Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 350.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PK trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PK's competition here
NTB vs BML-PL Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 350.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BML-PL trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BML-PL's competition here
NTB vs BAC Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 347.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC trades at $47.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC's competition here
NTB vs BML-PJ Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 346.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BML-PJ trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BML-PJ's competition here
NTB vs BML-PH Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 345.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BML-PH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BML-PH's competition here
NTB vs BML-PG Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 344.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BML-PG trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BML-PG's competition here
NTB vs WFC-PC Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 252.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WFC-PC trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 59.73. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WFC-PC's competition here
NTB vs WFC-PL Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 248.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WFC-PL trades at $1,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 251.66. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WFC-PL's competition here
NTB vs WFC Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 247B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WFC trades at $79.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WFC's competition here
NTB vs HSBC Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 221.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while HSBC trades at $65.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check HSBC's competition here
NTB vs WFC-PQ Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
NTB vs WFC-PY Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 196.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WFC-PY trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WFC-PY's competition here
NTB vs RY Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 192.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while RY trades at $136.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check RY's competition here
NTB vs MUFG Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 184.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while MUFG trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check MUFG's competition here
NTB vs WFC-PR Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WFC-PR's competition here
NTB vs C Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while C trades at $95.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas C's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to C's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check C's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PM Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 165B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PM trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PM's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PN Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PN trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PN's competition here
NTB vs SAN Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while SAN trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check SAN's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PS Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 143.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PS trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PS's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PO Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PO trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PO's competition here
NTB vs TD Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 129.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while TD trades at $74.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check TD's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PQ Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 128.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
NTB vs UBS Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while UBS trades at $39.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check UBS's competition here
NTB vs BAC-PP Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BAC-PP trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BAC-PP's competition here
NTB vs C-PJ Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check C-PJ's competition here
NTB vs BBVA Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 111.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BBVA trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BBVA's competition here
NTB vs RY-PT Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check RY-PT's competition here
NTB vs BMO Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BMO trades at $114.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BMO's competition here
NTB vs ING Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while ING trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check ING's competition here
NTB vs BCS Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BCS trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BCS's competition here
NTB vs BNS Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while BNS trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check BNS's competition here
NTB vs CM Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while CM trades at $73.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check CM's competition here
NTB vs SMFG Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while SMFG trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check SMFG's competition here
NTB vs WFC-PZ Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WFC-PZ trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
NTB vs NU Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while NU trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check NU's competition here
NTB vs WFC-PA Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WFC-PA trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WFC-PA's competition here
NTB vs WFC-PD Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WFC-PD trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WFC-PD's competition here
NTB vs JPM-PJ Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while JPM-PJ trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
NTB vs JPM-PL Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while JPM-PL trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check JPM-PL's competition here
NTB vs JPM-PK Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while JPM-PK trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check JPM-PK's competition here
NTB vs JPM-PM Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while JPM-PM trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check JPM-PM's competition here
NTB vs C-PK Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check C-PK's competition here
NTB vs NWG Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while NWG trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check NWG's competition here
NTB vs EWBC Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while EWBC trades at $103.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check EWBC's competition here
NTB vs CS Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check CS's competition here
NTB vs TANNL Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check TANNL's competition here
NTB vs FRC-PL Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check FRC-PL's competition here
NTB vs WBK Comparison August 2025
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $44.95, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.Check WBK's competition here