The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited NTB Peers
See (NTB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTB | $43.00 | +1.27% | 1.85B | 8.94 | $4.81 | +4.10% |
| JPM | $267.75 | +0.79% | 744.10B | 13.00 | $20.59 | +1.88% |
| JPM-PD | $24.31 | +0.51% | 742.02B | 1.80 | $13.48 | +1.88% |
| JPM-PC | $25.01 | +0.36% | 740.90B | 1.86 | $13.48 | +1.88% |
| BAC-PL | $1,177.35 | +0.37% | 443.38B | 335.05 | $3.51 | +2.29% |
| BAC-PE | $21.75 | +0.74% | 339.47B | 6.19 | $3.51 | +2.29% |
| BAC-PB | $24.37 | +0.41% | 338.35B | 6.93 | $3.51 | +2.29% |
| BAC-PK | $23.80 | +0.30% | 337.99B | 6.77 | $3.51 | +2.29% |
| BML-PJ | $22.14 | -1.52% | 337.11B | 6.30 | $3.51 | +2.29% |
| BML-PL | $21.10 | +0.09% | 336.10B | 6.00 | $3.51 | +2.29% |
Stock Comparison
NTB vs JPM Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 744.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while JPM trades at $267.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs JPM-PD Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 742.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while JPM-PD trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs JPM-PC Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 740.90B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while JPM-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PL Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 443.38B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PL trades at $1,177.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 335.05. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PE Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 339.47B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PE trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PB Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 338.35B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PB trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PK Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 337.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PK trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BML-PJ Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 337.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BML-PJ trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BML-PL Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 336.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BML-PL trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BML-PH Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 335.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BML-PH trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 334.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC trades at $44.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BML-PG Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 332.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BML-PG trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs WFC-PL Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 249.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while WFC-PL trades at $1,172.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 242.55. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs WFC-PC Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 249.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while WFC-PC trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 59.76. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs WFC Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 246.16B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while WFC trades at $75.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB and WFC have similar daily volatility (1.58).
NTB vs HSBC Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 208.56B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while HSBC trades at $58.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs WFC-PQ Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs WFC-PY Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 186.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while WFC-PY trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs WFC-PR Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.20B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs RY Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 176.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while RY trades at $124.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PM Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 161.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PM trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs MUFG Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 156.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while MUFG trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PN Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 150.79B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PN trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs C Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 141.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while C trades at $75.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas C's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PS Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 141.75B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PS trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PO Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 131.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PO trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PQ Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 126.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BAC-PP Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 123.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BAC-PP trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs C-PJ Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs SAN Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 116.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while SAN trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs TD Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 113.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while TD trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs UBS Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 106.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while UBS trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs RY-PT Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs SMFG Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 93.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while SMFG trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BBVA Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 86.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BBVA trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BMO Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 74.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BMO trades at $102.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs ING Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 64.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while ING trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BNS Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 64.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BNS trades at $51.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs NU Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 63.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while NU trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs WFC-PZ Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 62.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs BCS Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 61.90B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while BCS trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs CM Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 61.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while CM trades at $65.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs WFC-PA Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 60.20B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while WFC-PA trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs JPM-PJ Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 55.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs WFC-PD Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 55.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while WFC-PD trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs JPM-PL Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 53.58B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while JPM-PL trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs JPM-PK Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 52.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while JPM-PK trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs JPM-PM Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 49.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while JPM-PM trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs C-PK Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs NWG Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 26.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while NWG trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs EWBC Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 13.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while EWBC trades at $95.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs CS Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs TANNL Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.
NTB vs FRC-PL Comparison
NTB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTB stands at 1.85B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NTB is priced at $43.00, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTB currently has a P/E ratio of 8.94, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, NTB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTB is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTB.