Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | $2.27 | -0.87% | 51.8M | -3.39 | -$0.67 | N/A |
| KEX | $120.83 | +1.98% | 6.8B | 23.93 | $5.05 | N/A |
| MATX | $107.92 | -1.36% | 3.5B | 7.18 | $15.07 | +1.25% |
| HAFN | $5.66 | +2.63% | 2.8B | 4.72 | $1.20 | +16.56% |
| SB-PC | $25.91 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 17.18 | $1.51 | +4.74% |
| SB-PD | $25.53 | +0.04% | 2.6B | 16.93 | $1.51 | +4.74% |
| SBLK | $18.85 | +0.27% | 2.2B | 9.87 | $1.91 | +7.62% |
| BWLP | $13.99 | +1.97% | 2.1B | 7.47 | $1.87 | +12.37% |
| ZIM | $16.55 | -1.05% | 2B | 0.85 | $19.52 | +51.04% |
| CDLR | $21.87 | -1.22% | 1.9B | 17.94 | $1.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NM vs KEX Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while KEX trades at $120.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check KEX's competition here
NM vs MATX Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while MATX trades at $107.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check MATX's competition here
NM vs HAFN Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while HAFN trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check HAFN's competition here
NM vs SB-PC Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SB-PC trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SB-PC's competition here
NM vs SB-PD Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SB-PD trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SB-PD's competition here
NM vs SBLK Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SBLK trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SBLK's competition here
NM vs BWLP Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while BWLP trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check BWLP's competition here
NM vs ZIM Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while ZIM trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check ZIM's competition here
NM vs CDLR Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CDLR trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CDLR's competition here
NM vs CMBT Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CMBT trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CMBT's competition here
NM vs GOGL Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while GOGL trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GOGL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check GOGL's competition here
NM vs DAC Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while DAC trades at $93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check DAC's competition here
NM vs CCEC Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CCEC trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 40.76. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CCEC's competition here
NM vs SFL Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SFL trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SFL's competition here
NM vs SBBA Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SBBA's competition here
NM vs NMM Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while NMM trades at $42.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check NMM's competition here
NM vs CMRE-PC Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CMRE-PC trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
NM vs CMRE-PD Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CMRE-PD trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
NM vs CMRE-PB Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
NM vs CMRE Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CMRE trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CMRE's competition here
NM vs GSL Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while GSL trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check GSL's competition here
NM vs GSL-PB Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while GSL-PB trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check GSL-PB's competition here
NM vs CMRE-PE Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
NM vs CPLP Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CPLP's competition here
NM vs ECO Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 794.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while ECO trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check ECO's competition here
NM vs GNK Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 696.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while GNK trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check GNK's competition here
NM vs NAT Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 590.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while NAT trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check NAT's competition here
NM vs NETI Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check NETI's competition here
NM vs SB Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 432.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SB trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SB's competition here
NM vs ASC Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 425.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while ASC trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check ASC's competition here
NM vs CLCO Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 378.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CLCO trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CLCO's competition here
NM vs ESEA Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 363.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while ESEA trades at $51.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check ESEA's competition here
NM vs PANL Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 331.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while PANL trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check PANL's competition here
NM vs HSHP Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 327.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while HSHP trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check HSHP's competition here
NM vs GASS Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 253.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while GASS trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check GASS's competition here
NM vs KNOP Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while KNOP trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check KNOP's competition here
NM vs CMDB Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CMDB trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CMDB's competition here
NM vs ESEAV Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check ESEAV's competition here
NM vs DSX-PB Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while DSX-PB trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check DSX-PB's competition here
NM vs DSX Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while DSX trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check DSX's competition here
NM vs SHIP Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SHIP trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SHIP's competition here
NM vs SMHI Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 148M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SMHI trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SMHI's competition here
NM vs NCT Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while NCT trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 45.44. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check NCT's competition here
NM vs HMR Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 89M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while HMR trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to HMR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check HMR's competition here
NM vs UFG Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while UFG trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 267.00. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check UFG's competition here
NM vs TORO Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while TORO trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -153.00. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check TORO's competition here
NM vs PXSAP Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check PXSAP's competition here
NM vs EHLDV Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check EHLDV's competition here
NM vs PXS Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while PXS trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check PXS's competition here
NM vs NM-PG Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check NM-PG's competition here
NM vs HTCO Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while HTCO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to HTCO's ROE of +1067.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check HTCO's competition here
NM vs EDRY Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while EDRY trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check EDRY's competition here
NM vs TOPS Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while TOPS trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check TOPS's competition here
NM vs CACO Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CACO's competition here
NM vs PSHG Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while PSHG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check PSHG's competition here
NM vs GLBS Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while GLBS trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check GLBS's competition here
NM vs NM-PH Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check NM-PH's competition here
NM vs CTRM Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CTRM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CTRM's competition here
NM vs EHLD Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while EHLD trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check EHLD's competition here
NM vs USEA Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while USEA trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check USEA's competition here
NM vs GRIN Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GRIN has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while GRIN trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas GRIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GRIN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to GRIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check GRIN's competition here
NM vs ICON Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while ICON trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check ICON's competition here
NM vs OP Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while OP trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check OP's competition here
NM vs CISS Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while CISS trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check CISS's competition here
NM vs EGLE Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, EGLE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while EGLE trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas EGLE's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to EGLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is more volatile compared to EGLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check EGLE's competition here
NM vs PXSAW Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 146.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while PXSAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is more volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check PXSAW's competition here
NM vs SHIPW Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SHIPW's competition here
NM vs TOROV Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check TOROV's competition here
NM vs SHIPZ Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SHIPZ's competition here
NM vs SBLKZ Comparison July 2025
NM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NM stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NM is priced at $2.27, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NM currently has a P/E ratio of -3.39, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, NM's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NM is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NM.Check SBLKZ's competition here