Net Lease Office Properties
Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NLOP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLOP | $13.12 | +0.00% | 202.4M | -1.12 | -$12.21 | +139.51% |
| DLR | $176.90 | +0.00% | 60.4B | 49.06 | $3.58 | +2.77% |
| DLR-PK | $24.21 | -0.01% | 57.5B | 5.02 | $4.83 | +2.77% |
| BXP | $62.22 | +0.00% | 9.7B | 35.00 | $1.74 | +5.46% |
| ARE | $53.40 | +0.01% | 9.3B | -6.36 | -$8.44 | +8.73% |
| VNO-PL | $18.42 | +0.00% | 7.4B | 28.65 | $0.64 | +2.56% |
| VNO-PM | $17.94 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 27.90 | $0.64 | +2.56% |
| DLR-PL | $20.95 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 4.34 | $4.83 | +2.77% |
| HPP-PC | $14.95 | -0.27% | 5.7B | -120.32 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VNO | $29.38 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 6.92 | $4.20 | +2.56% |
Stock Comparison
NLOP vs DLR Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while DLR trades at $176.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 49.06. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DLR's competition here
NLOP vs DLR-PK Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while DLR-PK trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DLR-PK's competition here
NLOP vs BXP Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while BXP trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check BXP's competition here
NLOP vs ARE Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while ARE trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ARE's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PL Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while VNO-PL trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PL's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PM Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while VNO-PM trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PM's competition here
NLOP vs DLR-PL Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while DLR-PL trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DLR-PL's competition here
NLOP vs HPP-PC Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while HPP-PC trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -120.32. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check HPP-PC's competition here
NLOP vs VNO Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while VNO trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO's competition here
NLOP vs SLG-PI Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while SLG-PI trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check SLG-PI's competition here
NLOP vs CUZ Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while CUZ trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 99.83. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CUZ's competition here
NLOP vs KRC Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while KRC trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check KRC's competition here
NLOP vs CDP Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while CDP trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CDP's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PN Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while VNO-PN trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PN's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PO Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while VNO-PO trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PO's competition here
NLOP vs SLG Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while SLG trades at $39.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check SLG's competition here
NLOP vs HIW Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while HIW trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check HIW's competition here
NLOP vs CLI Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CLI's competition here
NLOP vs DEI Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while DEI trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 116.28. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DEI's competition here
NLOP vs OGCP Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while OGCP trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OGCP's competition here
NLOP vs FISK Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while FISK trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check FISK's competition here
NLOP vs ESBA Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while ESBA trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ESBA's competition here
NLOP vs WRE Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check WRE's competition here
NLOP vs PGRE Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PGRE's competition here
NLOP vs DEA Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while DEA trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 80.47. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DEA's competition here
NLOP vs PDM Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while PDM trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PDM's competition here
NLOP vs JBGS Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 928M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while JBGS trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check JBGS's competition here
NLOP vs CXP Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CXP's competition here
NLOP vs PSTL Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 641.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while PSTL trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 39.09. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PSTL's competition here
NLOP vs BDN Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while BDN trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check BDN's competition here
NLOP vs HPP Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 345.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while HPP trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check HPP's competition here
NLOP vs CIO-PA Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CIO-PA's competition here
NLOP vs CIO Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CIO's competition here
NLOP vs OPINL Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OPINL's competition here
NLOP vs ELME Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while ELME trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ELME's competition here
NLOP vs EQC Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to EQC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check EQC's competition here
NLOP vs ONL Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while ONL trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ONL's competition here
NLOP vs FSP Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while FSP trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check FSP's competition here
NLOP vs NYC Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while NYC trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check NYC's competition here
NLOP vs OPI Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OPI's competition here
NLOP vs CMCT Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while CMCT trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CMCT's competition here
NLOP vs EQC-PD Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check EQC-PD's competition here
NLOP vs OFC Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OFC's competition here
NLOP vs DTLA-P Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DTLA-P's competition here
NLOP vs CMCTP Comparison February 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 202.4M. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.12, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CMCTP's competition here