Net Lease Office Properties
Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NLOP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLOP | $13.86 | +1.02% | 205.5M | -1.41 | -$9.81 | +136.51% |
| DLR | $181.25 | +0.91% | 62.3B | 50.76 | $3.57 | +2.68% |
| DLR-PK | $22.75 | -0.04% | 53.7B | 4.69 | $4.83 | +2.68% |
| ARE | $48.31 | -0.21% | 8.4B | -5.72 | -$8.44 | +9.65% |
| BXP | $52.29 | +0.54% | 8.3B | 30.05 | $1.74 | +6.41% |
| DLR-PL | $19.78 | -0.05% | 6.8B | 4.09 | $4.83 | +2.68% |
| VNO-PM | $16.36 | +0.73% | 6.7B | 25.40 | $0.64 | +2.86% |
| VNO-PL | $16.57 | -2.47% | 6.6B | 25.70 | $0.64 | +2.86% |
| HPP-PC | $13.30 | -0.75% | 5B | -107.26 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VNO | $25.40 | -2.12% | 4.8B | 6.05 | $4.20 | +2.86% |
Stock Comparison
NLOP vs DLR Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while DLR trades at $181.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 50.76. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DLR's competition here
NLOP vs DLR-PK Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while DLR-PK trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DLR-PK's competition here
NLOP vs ARE Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while ARE trades at $48.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ARE's competition here
NLOP vs BXP Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while BXP trades at $52.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check BXP's competition here
NLOP vs DLR-PL Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while DLR-PL trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DLR-PL's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PM Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while VNO-PM trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PM's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PL Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while VNO-PL trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PL's competition here
NLOP vs HPP-PC Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while HPP-PC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -107.26. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check HPP-PC's competition here
NLOP vs VNO Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while VNO trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO's competition here
NLOP vs SLG-PI Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while SLG-PI trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check SLG-PI's competition here
NLOP vs CUZ Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while CUZ trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 93.94. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CUZ's competition here
NLOP vs CDP Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while CDP trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CDP's competition here
NLOP vs KRC Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while KRC trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check KRC's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PN Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while VNO-PN trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PN's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PO Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while VNO-PO trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PO's competition here
NLOP vs SLG Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while SLG trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -22.84. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check SLG's competition here
NLOP vs HIW Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while HIW trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check HIW's competition here
NLOP vs CLI Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CLI's competition here
NLOP vs DEI Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while DEI trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 106.78. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DEI's competition here
NLOP vs WRE Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check WRE's competition here
NLOP vs PGRE Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PGRE's competition here
NLOP vs FISK Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while FISK trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check FISK's competition here
NLOP vs ESBA Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while ESBA trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ESBA's competition here
NLOP vs OGCP Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while OGCP trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OGCP's competition here
NLOP vs DEA Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while DEA trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 82.22. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP and DEA have similar daily volatility (1.94).Check DEA's competition here
NLOP vs JBGS Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 836.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while JBGS trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check JBGS's competition here
NLOP vs PDM Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 829M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while PDM trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PDM's competition here
NLOP vs CXP Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CXP's competition here
NLOP vs PSTL Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while PSTL trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PSTL's competition here
NLOP vs BDN Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 503.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while BDN trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check BDN's competition here
NLOP vs HPP Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 343.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while HPP trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check HPP's competition here
NLOP vs CIO-PA Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CIO-PA's competition here
NLOP vs CIO Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CIO's competition here
NLOP vs OPINL Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OPINL's competition here
NLOP vs ELME Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 185.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while ELME trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ELME's competition here
NLOP vs EQC Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EQC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check EQC's competition here
NLOP vs ONL Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 130.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while ONL trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ONL's competition here
NLOP vs FSP Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while FSP trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check FSP's competition here
NLOP vs NYC Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while NYC trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check NYC's competition here
NLOP vs OPI Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OPI's competition here
NLOP vs EQC-PD Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check EQC-PD's competition here
NLOP vs CMCT Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 418.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while CMCT trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CMCT's competition here
NLOP vs CMCTP Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CMCTP's competition here
NLOP vs OFC Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OFC's competition here
NLOP vs DTLA-P Comparison March 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 205.5M. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $13.86, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DTLA-P's competition here