Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VNP.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while VNP.TO trades at CA$25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas VNP.TO's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNP.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is more volatile compared to VNP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check VNP.TO's competition here

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HG.CN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while HG.CN trades at CA$6.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas HG.CN's P/E ratio is -181.38. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HG.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is more volatile compared to HG.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check HG.CN's competition here

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LCFS.TO has a market cap of 716.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while LCFS.TO trades at CA$19.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas LCFS.TO's P/E ratio is 91.61. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCFS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is more volatile compared to LCFS.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check LCFS.TO's competition here

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ACT.CN has a market cap of 673.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while ACT.CN trades at CA$19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas ACT.CN's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACT.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is more volatile compared to ACT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check ACT.CN's competition here

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BOS.TO has a market cap of 233.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while BOS.TO trades at CA$8.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas BOS.TO's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOS.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is more volatile compared to BOS.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check BOS.TO's competition here

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ECO.TO has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while ECO.TO trades at CA$2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas ECO.TO's P/E ratio is -231.16. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECO.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is more volatile compared to ECO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check ECO.TO's competition here

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NANO.TO has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while NANO.TO trades at CA$0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas NANO.TO's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NANO.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is more volatile compared to NANO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check NANO.TO's competition here

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SURE.CN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while SURE.CN trades at CA$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas SURE.CN's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SURE.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is less volatile compared to SURE.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check SURE.CN's competition here

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ETI.CN has a market cap of 568K. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while ETI.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas ETI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETI.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is more volatile compared to ETI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check ETI.CN's competition here

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (TSX: NEO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEO.TO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SIXW.CN has a market cap of 195.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NEO.TO is priced at CA$32.92 on the TSX, while SIXW.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.97, whereas SIXW.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NEO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIXW.CN's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NEO.TO is more volatile compared to SIXW.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEO.TO.Check SIXW.CN's competition here