Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, VNP.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while VNP.TO trades at CA$25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas VNP.TO's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to VNP.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is less volatile compared to VNP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check VNP.TO's competition here

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, HG.CN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while HG.CN trades at CA$6.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas HG.CN's P/E ratio is -181.38. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to HG.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is less volatile compared to HG.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check HG.CN's competition here

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, NEO.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while NEO.TO trades at CA$33.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas NEO.TO's P/E ratio is 34.97. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NEO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is less volatile compared to NEO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check NEO.TO's competition here

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, LCFS.TO has a market cap of 716.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while LCFS.TO trades at CA$19.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas LCFS.TO's P/E ratio is 91.61. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LCFS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is less volatile compared to LCFS.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check LCFS.TO's competition here

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, ACT.CN has a market cap of 673.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while ACT.CN trades at CA$19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas ACT.CN's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ACT.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is more volatile compared to ACT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check ACT.CN's competition here

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, BOS.TO has a market cap of 233.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while BOS.TO trades at CA$8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas BOS.TO's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BOS.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is less volatile compared to BOS.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check BOS.TO's competition here

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, ECO.TO has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while ECO.TO trades at CA$2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas ECO.TO's P/E ratio is -231.16. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ECO.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is less volatile compared to ECO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check ECO.TO's competition here

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, SURE.CN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while SURE.CN trades at CA$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas SURE.CN's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SURE.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is less volatile compared to SURE.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check SURE.CN's competition here

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, ETI.CN has a market cap of 568K. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while ETI.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas ETI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ETI.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is more volatile compared to ETI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check ETI.CN's competition here

Nano One Materials Corp. (TSX: NANO.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NANO.TO stands at 94.6M. In comparison, SIXW.CN has a market cap of 195.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.TO is priced at CA$0.78 on the TSX, while SIXW.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NANO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.40, whereas SIXW.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NANO.TO's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SIXW.CN's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.TO is more volatile compared to SIXW.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.TO.Check SIXW.CN's competition here