Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, VNP.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while VNP.TO trades at CA$26.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas VNP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNP.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is less volatile compared to VNP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check VNP.TO's competition here

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, HG.CN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while HG.CN trades at CA$5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas HG.CN's P/E ratio is -179.89. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HG.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is less volatile compared to HG.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check HG.CN's competition here

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, NEO.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while NEO.TO trades at CA$33.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas NEO.TO's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is less volatile compared to NEO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check NEO.TO's competition here

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, ACT.CN has a market cap of 673.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while ACT.CN trades at CA$19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas ACT.CN's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACT.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is less volatile compared to ACT.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check ACT.CN's competition here

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, BOS.TO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while BOS.TO trades at CA$8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas BOS.TO's P/E ratio is 84.26. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOS.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is less volatile compared to BOS.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check BOS.TO's competition here

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, ECO.TO has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while ECO.TO trades at CA$2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas ECO.TO's P/E ratio is -254.58. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECO.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is less volatile compared to ECO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check ECO.TO's competition here

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, NANO.TO has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while NANO.TO trades at CA$0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas NANO.TO's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NANO.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is less volatile compared to NANO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check NANO.TO's competition here

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, SURE.CN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while SURE.CN trades at CA$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas SURE.CN's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SURE.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is less volatile compared to SURE.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check SURE.CN's competition here

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, ETI.CN has a market cap of 568K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while ETI.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas ETI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETI.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to ETI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check ETI.CN's competition here

Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (TSX: LCFS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 697.2M. In comparison, SIXW.CN has a market cap of 195.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$19.50 on the TSX, while SIXW.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 89.18, whereas SIXW.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIXW.CN's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to SIXW.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check SIXW.CN's competition here