AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, VNP.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while VNP.TO trades at CA$26.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas VNP.TO's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VNP.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is less volatile compared to VNP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check VNP.TO's competition here

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, HG.CN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while HG.CN trades at CA$6.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas HG.CN's P/E ratio is -181.38. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HG.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is less volatile compared to HG.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check HG.CN's competition here

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, NEO.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while NEO.TO trades at CA$33.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas NEO.TO's P/E ratio is 34.97. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NEO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is less volatile compared to NEO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check NEO.TO's competition here

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, LCFS.TO has a market cap of 716.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while LCFS.TO trades at CA$19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas LCFS.TO's P/E ratio is 91.61. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LCFS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is less volatile compared to LCFS.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check LCFS.TO's competition here

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, ACT.CN has a market cap of 673.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while ACT.CN trades at CA$19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas ACT.CN's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACT.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is less volatile compared to ACT.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check ACT.CN's competition here

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, ECO.TO has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while ECO.TO trades at CA$2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas ECO.TO's P/E ratio is -231.16. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECO.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is less volatile compared to ECO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check ECO.TO's competition here

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, NANO.TO has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while NANO.TO trades at CA$0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas NANO.TO's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NANO.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is less volatile compared to NANO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check NANO.TO's competition here

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, SURE.CN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while SURE.CN trades at CA$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas SURE.CN's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SURE.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is less volatile compared to SURE.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check SURE.CN's competition here

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, ETI.CN has a market cap of 568K. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while ETI.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas ETI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ETI.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is similarly volatile compared to ETI.CN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check ETI.CN's competition here

AirBoss of America Corp. (TSX: BOS.TO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOS.TO stands at 233.4M. In comparison, SIXW.CN has a market cap of 195.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BOS.TO is priced at CA$8.59 on the TSX, while SIXW.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 87.73, whereas SIXW.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BOS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SIXW.CN's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BOS.TO is similarly volatile compared to SIXW.CN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOS.TO.Check SIXW.CN's competition here