NewAge, Inc.
NewAge, Inc. NBEV Peers
See (NBEV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBEV | $0.09 | -25.20% | 0 | -0.35 | -$0.27 | N/A |
| KO | $70.94 | -0.60% | 305.3B | 28.49 | $2.49 | +2.76% |
| PEP | $131.10 | -0.49% | 179.7B | 19.28 | $6.80 | +4.14% |
| MNST | $63.00 | -0.25% | 61.4B | 41.45 | $1.52 | N/A |
| KDP | $32.56 | -0.73% | 44.2B | 29.60 | $1.10 | +2.77% |
| CCEP | $92.02 | +1.15% | 42.4B | 26.07 | $3.53 | +2.41% |
| PRMB | $30.77 | -1.96% | 11.6B | -279.68 | -$0.11 | +3.85% |
| CELH | $40.08 | -0.02% | 10.3B | 121.45 | $0.33 | N/A |
| COKE | $106.17 | -1.40% | 9.3B | 16.54 | $6.42 | +7.15% |
| FIZZ | $45.76 | -0.33% | 4.3B | 22.99 | $1.99 | +7.10% |
Stock Comparison
NBEV vs KO Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 305.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while KO trades at $70.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs PEP Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 179.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PEP trades at $131.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs MNST Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while MNST trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs KDP Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while KDP trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs CCEP Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CCEP trades at $92.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs PRMB Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PRMB trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -279.68. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs CELH Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CELH trades at $40.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 121.45. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs COKE Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while COKE trades at $106.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs FIZZ Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while FIZZ trades at $45.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs PRMW Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs AKO-A Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while AKO-A trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs AKO-B Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while AKO-B trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs KOF Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while KOF trades at $96.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs COCO Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while COCO trades at $34.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs OTLY Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while OTLY trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs ZVIA Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 167.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while ZVIA trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs REED Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while REED trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs BRFH Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while BRFH trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -12.48. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs SHOT Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while SHOT trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.
NBEV vs WTER Comparison
NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at 0. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 306.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while WTER trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.