NewAge, Inc.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 303.52B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while KO trades at $70.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 178.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PEP trades at $130.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 59.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while MNST trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 40.94. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 56.01B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while NNFSF trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 45.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while KDP trades at $33.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 41.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CCEP trades at $89.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 18.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while EMBVF trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 18.42B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CCHBF trades at $50.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 18.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CCHGY trades at $50.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 13.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while ITONF trades at $61.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PRMB trades at $31.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -638.40. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 10.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while COKE trades at $1,152.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CELH trades at $36.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 111.42. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to BTVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while YKLTY trades at $11.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while YKLTF trades at $19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 4.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while COCSF trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while UPCHY trades at $112.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while FIZZ trades at $43.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PRMW trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to UNPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while AKO-A trades at $19.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while AKO-B trades at $25.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CCOJY trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 126.04. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to CCOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to ITOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while AQPW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -26.94. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while KOF trades at $92.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while COCO trades at $33.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while YNAJF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to OSOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while FQVTF trades at $10.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while LSDAF trades at $149.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 734.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to BAGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 697.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to NJMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 299.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while OTLY trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 201.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while HAATF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 175.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while ZVIA trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 79.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while REED trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to REED's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 40.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while BRFH trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 40.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while SHOT trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 26.65M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while JSDA trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 24.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while KGKG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 8.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while MOJO trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 7.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while KRTL trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while HIRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 3.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while FLWBF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while DRNK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 2.93M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while FBEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to FBEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while NTEI trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to NTEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while APRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 2.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while RVBR trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to PLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 2.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while INKW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PURT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while RMHB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864639.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while ALKM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to ALKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 796047.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while ASII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 739814.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while HSEEF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of -19.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509782.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while FMBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FMBV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378382.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while VGID trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 262614.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while HFBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 214659.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while WTER trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199559.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while FHBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 185817.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PDPG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171816.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while DNAX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to DNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 171281.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while EQLB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155461.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while GHMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GHMP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to GHMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 119956.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while MLHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 119722.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while DNDT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 39715.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while TBEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25613.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while NBVG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NBVG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22922.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while STZU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 22637.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while KRED trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to KRED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22350.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while FGFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to FGFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12326.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +11.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to BVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 9262.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while BGEM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1861.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while SWRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SWRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to SWRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 1124.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while PPBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PPBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1080.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while HKBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HKBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while MCHA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MCHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to MCHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while BBDA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BBDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to BBDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while AQUI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AQUI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while ABVG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to ABVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, GGGRF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is more volatile compared to GGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, RMIL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while RMIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.

NBEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBEV stands at N/A. In comparison, CLCL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NBEV is priced at $0.09, while CLCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBEV's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBEV is less volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBEV.