Nordic American Tankers Limited
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT | $3.02 | +0.33% | 640.5M | 17.79 | $0.17 | +9.57% |
| KEX | $98.27 | +0.36% | 5.5B | 18.60 | $5.28 | N/A |
| MATX | $104.76 | +0.75% | 3.3B | 7.14 | $14.69 | +1.31% |
| HAFN | $5.84 | -1.18% | 2.9B | 4.86 | $1.20 | +15.68% |
| SB-PD | $25.84 | -0.15% | 2.6B | 17.14 | $1.51 | +4.60% |
| BWLP | $15.10 | -5.57% | 2.3B | 8.08 | $1.87 | +11.21% |
| SBLK | $19.28 | +0.36% | 2.2B | 19.47 | $0.99 | +7.46% |
| CDLR | $22.18 | +1.32% | 1.9B | 18.18 | $1.22 | N/A |
| ZIM | $14.47 | +2.33% | 1.7B | 0.88 | $16.36 | +58.65% |
| DAC | $91.81 | -0.71% | 1.7B | 3.81 | $24.09 | +3.69% |
Stock Comparison
NAT vs KEX Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while KEX trades at $98.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check KEX's competition here
NAT vs MATX Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while MATX trades at $104.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check MATX's competition here
NAT vs HAFN Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while HAFN trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check HAFN's competition here
NAT vs SB-PD Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SB-PD trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SB-PD's competition here
NAT vs BWLP Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while BWLP trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check BWLP's competition here
NAT vs SBLK Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SBLK trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SBLK's competition here
NAT vs CDLR Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CDLR trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CDLR's competition here
NAT vs ZIM Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while ZIM trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ZIM's competition here
NAT vs DAC Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while DAC trades at $91.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check DAC's competition here
NAT vs CMBT Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CMBT trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMBT's competition here
NAT vs GOGL Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while GOGL trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOGL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GOGL's competition here
NAT vs CMRE Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CMRE trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE's competition here
NAT vs NMM Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while NMM trades at $47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NMM's competition here
NAT vs CMRE-PC Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
NAT vs CMRE-PB Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CMRE-PB trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
NAT vs CMRE-PD Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CMRE-PD trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
NAT vs CCEC Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CCEC trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CCEC's competition here
NAT vs SBBA Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SBBA's competition here
NAT vs SFL Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SFL trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SFL's competition here
NAT vs GSL Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while GSL trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GSL's competition here
NAT vs CMRE-PE Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
NAT vs CPLP Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CPLP's competition here
NAT vs GSL-PB Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 959.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while GSL-PB trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GSL-PB's competition here
NAT vs ECO Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 846.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while ECO trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ECO's competition here
NAT vs GNK Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 732.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while GNK trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GNK's competition here
NAT vs ASC Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 464.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while ASC trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ASC's competition here
NAT vs SB Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SB trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SB's competition here
NAT vs ESEA Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 444.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while ESEA trades at $63.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ESEA's competition here
NAT vs SB-PC Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 440M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SB-PC trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SB-PC's competition here
NAT vs NETI Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NETI's competition here
NAT vs CLCO Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CLCO trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CLCO's competition here
NAT vs HSHP Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 358.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while HSHP trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 51.33. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check HSHP's competition here
NAT vs PANL Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while PANL trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PANL's competition here
NAT vs GASS Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 279.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while GASS trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GASS's competition here
NAT vs KNOP Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 254.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while KNOP trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 35.57. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check KNOP's competition here
NAT vs CMDB Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 245.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CMDB trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMDB's competition here
NAT vs OP Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 214.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while OP trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check OP's competition here
NAT vs ESEAV Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ESEAV's competition here
NAT vs DSX Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while DSX trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check DSX's competition here
NAT vs DSX-PB Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while DSX-PB trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check DSX-PB's competition here
NAT vs SMHI Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 168.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SMHI trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SMHI's competition here
NAT vs SHIP Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 167.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SHIP trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SHIP's competition here
NAT vs UFG Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while UFG trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 435.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check UFG's competition here
NAT vs HTCO Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while HTCO trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTCO's ROE of +1067.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check HTCO's competition here
NAT vs HMR Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while HMR trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HMR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check HMR's competition here
NAT vs TORO Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while TORO trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -138.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check TORO's competition here
NAT vs NM Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NM's competition here
NAT vs NM-PH Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NM-PH's competition here
NAT vs PXSAP Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PXSAP's competition here
NAT vs EHLDV Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check EHLDV's competition here
NAT vs NCT Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while NCT trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NCT's competition here
NAT vs NM-PG Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NM-PG's competition here
NAT vs EDRY Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while EDRY trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check EDRY's competition here
NAT vs PXS Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while PXS trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is -132.50. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PXS's competition here
NAT vs TOPS Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while TOPS trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check TOPS's competition here
NAT vs CACO Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CACO's competition here
NAT vs PSHG Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while PSHG trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PSHG's competition here
NAT vs GLBS Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while GLBS trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -25.74. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GLBS's competition here
NAT vs CTRM Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CTRM trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTRM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CTRM's competition here
NAT vs EHLD Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while EHLD trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check EHLD's competition here
NAT vs USEA Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while USEA trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check USEA's competition here
NAT vs GRIN Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, GRIN has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while GRIN trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas GRIN's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRIN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GRIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GRIN's competition here
NAT vs ICON Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while ICON trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ICON's competition here
NAT vs CISS Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while CISS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CISS's competition here
NAT vs EGLE Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, EGLE has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while EGLE trades at $28.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas EGLE's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EGLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to EGLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check EGLE's competition here
NAT vs SHIPW Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SHIPW's competition here
NAT vs PXSAW Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 62.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while PXSAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PXSAW's competition here
NAT vs SHIPZ Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SHIPZ's competition here
NAT vs SBLKZ Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SBLKZ's competition here
NAT vs TOROV Comparison August 2025
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 640.5M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $3.02, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check TOROV's competition here