Nahar Spinning Mills Limited

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 387.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹35,040.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 51.70. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 387.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹35,065.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 51.71. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 287.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹840.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 287.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹841.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.99. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while VTL.NS trades at ₹547.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check VTL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while VTL.BO trades at ₹547.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check VTL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹24.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 112.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹119.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹119.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹313.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹313.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹375.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹374.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹388.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹57.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹57.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,526.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check PGIL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,526.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check PGIL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹12.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹596.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹597.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹428.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is -347.32. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹428.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is -347.20. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹246.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ICIL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹246.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check ICIL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹786.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 91.28. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹786.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 91.01. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹617.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹616.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 39.83. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹1,211.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.16. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹1,206.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹155.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is -18.78. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check KITEX.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹156.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check KITEX.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹1,108.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 75.64. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹1,107.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 75.23. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to GANECOS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GANECOS.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹453.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check KKCL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹453.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check KKCL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹353.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹352.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 44.68. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹535.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹535.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹510.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹511.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹441.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹444.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹385.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹385.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹102.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹102.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 122.08. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹20.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹20.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹228.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹229.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹41.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹41.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹740.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SPAL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹742.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SPAL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SPORTKING.NS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SPORTKING.NS trades at ₹130.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SPORTKING.NS's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPORTKING.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SPORTKING.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SPORTKING.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SPORTKING.BO trades at ₹129.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SPORTKING.BO's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPORTKING.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SPORTKING.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹29.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹267.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹243.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹242.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹20.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 48.33. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹187.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -696.67. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹185.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -695.78. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹446.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to FAZE3Q.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹506.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while FAZE3Q.NS trades at ₹450.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FAZE3Q.NS's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FAZE3Q.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to FAZE3Q.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check FAZE3Q.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹504.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while HIMATSEIDE.NS trades at ₹82.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas HIMATSEIDE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check HIMATSEIDE.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹82.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RUPA.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RUPA.NS trades at ₹129.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RUPA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RUPA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to RUPA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RUPA.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹129.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to RUPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RUPA.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹398.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹396.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹33.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹33.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹223.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 41.99. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,305.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,304.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DIGJAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while DIGJAMLTD.NS trades at ₹82.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas DIGJAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check DIGJAMLTD.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹76.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹77.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹210.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹209.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹78.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹78.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PRECOT.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while PRECOT.NS trades at ₹523.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PRECOT.NS's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRECOT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to PRECOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check PRECOT.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹132.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 76.44. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RSWM.BO's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹132.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check RSWM.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, UNITEDPOLY.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while UNITEDPOLY.NS trades at ₹26.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas UNITEDPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is more volatile compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check UNITEDPOLY.NS's competition here

NAHARSPING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAHARSPING.BO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAHARSPING.BO is priced at ₹222.80, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,016.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAHARSPING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, NAHARSPING.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAHARSPING.BO is less volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAHARSPING.BO.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here