NIO Inc.
NIO Inc. N3IA.F Peers
See (N3IA.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N3IA.F | €3.49 | -4.38% | 6.7B | -2.55 | -€1.39 | N/A |
| TL0.DE | €271.45 | +0.28% | 873.1B | 180.97 | €1.50 | N/A |
| TOM.SG | €14.60 | -0.45% | 190.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.82% |
| TOM.DU | €14.48 | -0.97% | 189.1B | N/A | N/A | +3.86% |
| TOM.F | €14.43 | -0.93% | 188.3B | 6.87 | €2.10 | +3.65% |
| BY6.F | €13.65 | -1.62% | 106.6B | 7.50 | €1.82 | +1.30% |
| 2FE.DE | €428.60 | +2.12% | 76.4B | 48.65 | €8.81 | +1.27% |
| BMW.DE | €84.46 | -0.71% | 50.7B | 7.98 | €10.58 | +11.28% |
| MBG.DE | €51.59 | -1.90% | 49.7B | 5.69 | €9.07 | +18.61% |
| BMW3.DE | €77.85 | -0.64% | 48.4B | 7.54 | €10.32 | +11.28% |
Stock Comparison
N3IA.F vs TL0.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TL0.DE has a market cap of 873.1B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while TL0.DE trades at €271.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas TL0.DE's P/E ratio is 180.97. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TL0.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to TL0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs TOM.SG Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 190.7B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while TOM.SG trades at €14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs TOM.DU Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 189.1B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while TOM.DU trades at €14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs TOM.F Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TOM.F has a market cap of 188.3B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while TOM.F trades at €14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas TOM.F's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TOM.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to TOM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs BY6.F Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while BY6.F trades at €13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs 2FE.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, 2FE.DE has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while 2FE.DE trades at €428.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas 2FE.DE's P/E ratio is 48.65. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to 2FE.DE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to 2FE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs BMW.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while BMW.DE trades at €84.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs MBG.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while MBG.DE trades at €51.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs BMW3.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while BMW3.DE trades at €77.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs VOW3.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while VOW3.DE trades at €90.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs VOW.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while VOW.DE trades at €92.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs 8GM.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while 8GM.DE trades at €45.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to 8GM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs P911.HM Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, P911.HM has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while P911.HM trades at €42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas P911.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to P911.HM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to P911.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs P911.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while P911.DE trades at €42.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs FMC1.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while FMC1.DE trades at €9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs 8TI.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while 8TI.DE trades at €8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs PAH3.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PAH3.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while PAH3.DE trades at €34.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas PAH3.DE's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PAH3.DE's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to PAH3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs RNL.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while RNL.DE trades at €33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is less volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs 0O9.F Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, 0O9.F has a market cap of 222M. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while 0O9.F trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas 0O9.F's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to 0O9.F's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is less volatile compared to 0O9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.
N3IA.F vs PMAG.DE Comparison
N3IA.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, N3IA.F stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PMAG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, N3IA.F is priced at €3.49, while PMAG.DE trades at €57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
N3IA.F currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas PMAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, N3IA.F's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PMAG.DE's ROE of -3.80%. Regarding short-term risk, N3IA.F is more volatile compared to PMAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for N3IA.F.