Myomo, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MYO
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MYO
Myomo, Inc. (MYO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MYO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO | $0.69 | -1.43% | 26.4M | -1.85 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| BSX-PA | $122.18 | +2.37% | 175.4B | 230.53 | $0.53 | N/A |
| ABT | $100.30 | -2.36% | 174.2B | 26.53 | $3.78 | +2.41% |
| SYK | $339.15 | +0.00% | 129.8B | 40.38 | $8.40 | +1.01% |
| MDT | $87.21 | -0.80% | 112B | 24.36 | $3.58 | +3.26% |
| BSX | $61.79 | +0.83% | 91.8B | 31.84 | $1.94 | N/A |
| BRKRP | $298.34 | -1.28% | 45.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.53% |
| EW | $77.87 | -1.62% | 45.2B | 43.02 | $1.81 | N/A |
| PHG | $28.31 | +0.64% | 27.1B | 26.47 | $1.07 | +3.13% |
| DXCM | $64.02 | -2.53% | 25B | 30.63 | $2.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MYO vs BSX-PA Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BSX-PA's competition here
MYO vs ABT Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 174.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ABT trades at $100.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to ABT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ABT's competition here
MYO vs SYK Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SYK trades at $339.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to SYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SYK's competition here
MYO vs MDT Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, MDT has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while MDT trades at $87.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas MDT's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to MDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check MDT's competition here
MYO vs BSX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BSX trades at $61.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to BSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BSX's competition here
MYO vs BRKRP Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BRKRP has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BRKRP trades at $298.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BRKRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BRKRP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to BRKRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BRKRP's competition here
MYO vs EW Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, EW has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while EW trades at $77.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas EW's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to EW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to EW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check EW's competition here
MYO vs PHG Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while PHG trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to PHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check PHG's competition here
MYO vs DXCM Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while DXCM trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check DXCM's competition here
MYO vs STE Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, STE has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while STE trades at $222.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas STE's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to STE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to STE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check STE's competition here
MYO vs ZBH Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ZBH trades at $93.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ZBH's competition here
MYO vs ABMD Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ABMD trades at $381.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ABMD's competition here
MYO vs SNN Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SNN trades at $33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to SNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SNN's competition here
MYO vs PODD Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while PODD trades at $196.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 56.59. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to PODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check PODD's competition here
MYO vs PEN Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while PEN trades at $329.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 72.65. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to PEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check PEN's competition here
MYO vs SWAV Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SWAV has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SWAV trades at $334.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SWAV's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to SWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SWAV's competition here
MYO vs ALGN Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ALGN trades at $173.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ALGN's competition here
MYO vs GMED Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while GMED trades at $90.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to GMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check GMED's competition here
MYO vs BIO Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BIO trades at $279.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BIO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to BIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BIO's competition here
MYO vs BIO-B Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BIO-B trades at $277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BIO-B's competition here
MYO vs GKOS Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while GKOS trades at $116.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -34.44. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check GKOS's competition here
MYO vs BRKR Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BRKR trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is -250.60. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BRKR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BRKR's competition here
MYO vs NARI Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while NARI trades at $79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check NARI's competition here
MYO vs TMDX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while TMDX trades at $114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check TMDX's competition here
MYO vs IRTC Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while IRTC trades at $115.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -82.91. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check IRTC's competition here
MYO vs AXNX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while AXNX trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check AXNX's competition here
MYO vs LIVN Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while LIVN trades at $62.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is -14.11. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to LIVN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check LIVN's competition here
MYO vs ITGR Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ITGR trades at $85.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to ITGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ITGR's competition here
MYO vs NUVA Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while NUVA trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check NUVA's competition here
MYO vs AORT Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while AORT trades at $37.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is 179.21. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to AORT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to AORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check AORT's competition here
MYO vs ESTA Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ESTA trades at $60.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -35.83. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ESTA's competition here
MYO vs AXGN Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while AXGN trades at $31.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check AXGN's competition here
MYO vs AHCO Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while AHCO trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is -23.40. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to AHCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check AHCO's competition here
MYO vs ATEC Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ATEC trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -17.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ATEC's competition here
MYO vs INSP Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while INSP trades at $54.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to INSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check INSP's competition here
MYO vs UFPT Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while UFPT trades at $201.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check UFPT's competition here
MYO vs PMI Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PMI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while PMI trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas PMI's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PMI's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to PMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check PMI's competition here
MYO vs TNDM Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while TNDM trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check TNDM's competition here
MYO vs HSKA Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while HSKA trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check HSKA's competition here
MYO vs PRCT Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while PRCT trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -13.81. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check PRCT's competition here
MYO vs IRMD Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while IRMD trades at $93.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 54.62. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check IRMD's competition here
MYO vs CNMD Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while CNMD trades at $36.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check CNMD's competition here
MYO vs SILK Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SILK trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to SILK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SILK's competition here
MYO vs FNA Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while FNA trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to FNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check FNA's competition here
MYO vs BFLY Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BFLY trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -13.24. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BFLY's competition here
MYO vs LMRI Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, LMRI has a market cap of 895.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while LMRI trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas LMRI's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to LMRI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to LMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check LMRI's competition here
MYO vs SSII Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 860.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SSII trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -71.67. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SSII's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to SSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SSII's competition here
MYO vs INMD Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 857.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while INMD trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to INMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check INMD's competition here
MYO vs CSII Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while CSII trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to CSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check CSII's competition here
MYO vs IART Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 771.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while IART trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas IART's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to IART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check IART's competition here
MYO vs CRY Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CRY has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while CRY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas CRY's P/E ratio is 425.71. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CRY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to CRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check CRY's competition here
MYO vs CBLL Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while CBLL trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -12.43. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check CBLL's competition here
MYO vs AVNS Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 659M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while AVNS trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check AVNS's competition here
MYO vs SRDX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 614.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SRDX trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -34.66. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SRDX's competition here
MYO vs BVS Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 610.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BVS trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BVS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to BVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BVS's competition here
MYO vs CTKB Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 582.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while CTKB trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check CTKB's competition here
MYO vs APEN Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while APEN trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to APEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check APEN's competition here
MYO vs SIBN Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 567.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SIBN trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -29.18. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SIBN's competition here
MYO vs BWAY Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 546M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BWAY trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 77.33. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BWAY's competition here
MYO vs ZIMV Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 535.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ZIMV trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -27.52. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ZIMV's competition here
MYO vs TCMD Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 533M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while TCMD trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check TCMD's competition here
MYO vs OFIX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 497M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while OFIX trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check OFIX's competition here
MYO vs NPCE Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 480.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while NPCE trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -21.61. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check NPCE's competition here
MYO vs VREX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while VREX trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to VREX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to VREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check VREX's competition here
MYO vs PACB Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 404.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while PACB trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PACB's ROE of -11.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to PACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check PACB's competition here
MYO vs KIDS Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 403.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while KIDS trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check KIDS's competition here
MYO vs VMD Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, VMD has a market cap of 367.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while VMD trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas VMD's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to VMD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to VMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check VMD's competition here
MYO vs CERS Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 363.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while CERS trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -23.62. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to CERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check CERS's competition here
MYO vs DCTH Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, DCTH has a market cap of 348.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while DCTH trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas DCTH's P/E ratio is 143.43. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to DCTH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to DCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check DCTH's competition here
MYO vs LAB Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, LAB has a market cap of 345.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while LAB trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas LAB's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to LAB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to LAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check LAB's competition here
MYO vs CATX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 329.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while CATX trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to CATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check CATX's competition here
MYO vs SMLR Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SMLR trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SMLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SMLR's competition here
MYO vs RXST Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while RXST trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to RXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check RXST's competition here
MYO vs SENS Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 279M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SENS trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SENS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to SENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SENS's competition here
MYO vs MASS Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, MASS has a market cap of 266.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while MASS trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas MASS's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MASS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to MASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check MASS's competition here
MYO vs CLPT Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 258.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while CLPT trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check CLPT's competition here
MYO vs MGRM Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while MGRM trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check MGRM's competition here
MYO vs NVRO Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while NVRO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check NVRO's competition here
MYO vs ANIK Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 212.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ANIK trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is -21.09. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ANIK's competition here
MYO vs EYES Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, EYES has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while EYES trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas EYES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to EYES's ROE of -3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to EYES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check EYES's competition here
MYO vs AVR Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while AVR trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to AVR's ROE of -5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to AVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check AVR's competition here
MYO vs ELMD Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 201.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while ELMD trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check ELMD's competition here
MYO vs BSGM Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while BSGM trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BSGM's ROE of +17.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check BSGM's competition here
MYO vs CVRX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CVRX has a market cap of 188.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while CVRX trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas CVRX's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CVRX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to CVRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check CVRX's competition here
MYO vs QTI Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, QTI has a market cap of 187.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while QTI trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas QTI's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to QTI's ROE of +3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to QTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check QTI's competition here
MYO vs SGHT Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SGHT trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SGHT's competition here
MYO vs PROF Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while PROF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to PROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check PROF's competition here
MYO vs MDGS Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, MDGS has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while MDGS trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas MDGS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MDGS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to MDGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check MDGS's competition here
MYO vs INGN Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while INGN trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to INGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check INGN's competition here
MYO vs APYX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, APYX has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while APYX trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas APYX's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to APYX's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to APYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check APYX's competition here
MYO vs QIPT Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, QIPT has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while QIPT trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas QIPT's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to QIPT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to QIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check QIPT's competition here
MYO vs TLSI Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TLSI has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while TLSI trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas TLSI's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TLSI's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to TLSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check TLSI's competition here
MYO vs QTRX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while QTRX trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check QTRX's competition here
MYO vs NNOX Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, NNOX has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while NNOX trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas NNOX's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to NNOX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to NNOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check NNOX's competition here
MYO vs SNWV Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SNWV has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while SNWV trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas SNWV's P/E ratio is 40.10. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SNWV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to SNWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check SNWV's competition here
MYO vs RCEL Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, RCEL has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while RCEL trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas RCEL's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to RCEL's ROE of +4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to RCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check RCEL's competition here
MYO vs EDAP Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, EDAP has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while EDAP trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas EDAP's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to EDAP's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to EDAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check EDAP's competition here
MYO vs LUCD Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, LUCD has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while LUCD trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas LUCD's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to LUCD's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is more volatile compared to LUCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check LUCD's competition here
MYO vs TMCI Comparison April 2026
MYO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MYO stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TMCI has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MYO is priced at $0.69, while TMCI trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MYO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.85, whereas TMCI's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, MYO's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TMCI's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MYO is less volatile compared to TMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MYO.Check TMCI's competition here