McEwen Mining Inc.
McEwen Mining Inc. MUX Peers
See (MUX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUX | $7.02 | -2.64% | 378.99M | -12.32 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| TFPM | $19.62 | -1.70% | 3.94B | 654.00 | $0.03 | +1.11% |
| BVN | $14.21 | -2.07% | 3.61B | 8.66 | $1.64 | +1.96% |
| SILV | $11.55 | -0.86% | 1.72B | 19.91 | $0.58 | N/A |
| GATO | $14.40 | -3.10% | 1.00B | 30.64 | $0.47 | N/A |
| EXK | $3.22 | -4.17% | 844.68M | -24.77 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| PPTA | $11.51 | -6.23% | 823.46M | -39.69 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| MMX | $5.00 | +2.88% | 741.59M | 29.24 | $0.17 | N/A |
| SLSR | $3.48 | +7.21% | 567.89M | -7.10 | -$0.49 | N/A |
| NSR | $7.76 | +6.61% | 477.01M | 776.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MUX vs TFPM Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while TFPM trades at $19.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 654.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs BVN Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while BVN trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs SILV Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs GATO Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs EXK Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 844.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while EXK trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -24.77. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs PPTA Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 823.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while PPTA trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -39.69. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs MMX Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs SLSR Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 567.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while SLSR trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLSR's ROE of -14.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs NSR Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs ASM Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 329.58M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while ASM trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs ITRG Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 260.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while ITRG trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs MTA Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 258.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while MTA trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -46.67. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs GROY Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 250.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while GROY trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -73.55. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs NEWP Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 193.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while NEWP trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -37.67. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs VOXR Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 159.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while VOXR trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -105.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs PLG Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 116.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while PLG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs ATLX Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 69.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while ATLX trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs GROY-WT Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 38.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while GROY-WT trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs AUMN Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 378.99M. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $7.02, while AUMN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.32, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AUMN's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.