McEwen Mining Inc.
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MUX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUX | $10.62 | +2.12% | 574.7M | -18.68 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| TFPM | $24.46 | +2.47% | 5.1B | 816.00 | $0.03 | +0.90% |
| BVN | $17.90 | +2.29% | 4.5B | 10.91 | $1.64 | +1.63% |
| PPTA | $16.68 | -0.36% | 1.8B | -57.52 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| SILV | $11.55 | -0.86% | 1.7B | 19.91 | $0.58 | N/A |
| EXK | $5.26 | +0.96% | 1.5B | -20.19 | -$0.26 | N/A |
| GATO | $14.40 | -3.10% | 1B | 30.64 | $0.47 | N/A |
| SLSR | $4.96 | +1.22% | 821.3M | -9.78 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| MMX | $5.00 | +2.88% | 741.6M | 29.24 | $0.17 | N/A |
| ASM | $3.51 | +4.15% | 505.2M | 34.90 | $0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MUX vs TFPM Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while TFPM trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 816.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check TFPM's competition here
MUX vs BVN Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while BVN trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check BVN's competition here
MUX vs PPTA Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while PPTA trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -57.52. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check PPTA's competition here
MUX vs SILV Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check SILV's competition here
MUX vs EXK Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while EXK trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -20.19. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check EXK's competition here
MUX vs GATO Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check GATO's competition here
MUX vs SLSR Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 821.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while SLSR trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +20.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check SLSR's competition here
MUX vs MMX Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check MMX's competition here
MUX vs ASM Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 505.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while ASM trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ASM's competition here
MUX vs GROY Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 486.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while GROY trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -142.75. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check GROY's competition here
MUX vs NSR Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check NSR's competition here
MUX vs MTA Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 388.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while MTA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check MTA's competition here
MUX vs NEWP Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 271.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while NEWP trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -52.83. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check NEWP's competition here
MUX vs ITRG Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while ITRG trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -156.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ITRG's competition here
MUX vs PLG Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while PLG trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -39.87. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check PLG's competition here
MUX vs VOXR Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while VOXR trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -81.25. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check VOXR's competition here
MUX vs GROY-WT Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while GROY-WT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check GROY-WT's competition here
MUX vs ATLX Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 116.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while ATLX trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -388.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ATLX's competition here
MUX vs AUMN Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while AUMN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AUMN's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check AUMN's competition here
MUX vs TRQ Comparison August 2025
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 574.7M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.62, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check TRQ's competition here