McEwen Mining Inc.
McEwen Mining Inc. MUX Peers
See (MUX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUX | $10.84 | +0.79% | 575M | -18.68 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| TFPM | $23.54 | +0.06% | 4.7B | 775.67 | $0.03 | +1.17% |
| BVN | $16.67 | +1.65% | 4.2B | 10.07 | $1.64 | +2.21% |
| SILV | $11.55 | -0.86% | 1.7B | 19.91 | $0.58 | N/A |
| EXK | $5.76 | +8.79% | 1.6B | -21.74 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| PPTA | $14.45 | +10.64% | 1.5B | -50.29 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| GATO | $14.40 | -3.10% | 1B | 30.64 | $0.47 | N/A |
| SLSR | $5.44 | +1.02% | 921.7M | -10.98 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| MMX | $5.00 | +2.88% | 741.6M | 29.24 | $0.17 | N/A |
| ASM | $4.15 | +8.92% | 563.1M | 38.90 | $0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MUX vs TFPM Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while TFPM trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 775.67. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs BVN Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while BVN trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs SILV Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs EXK Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while EXK trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -21.74. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs PPTA Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while PPTA trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -50.29. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs GATO Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs SLSR Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 921.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while SLSR trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +20.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs MMX Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs ASM Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 563.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while ASM trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs NSR Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs GROY Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 404.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while GROY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -118.75. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs MTA Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while MTA trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -80.10. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs NEWP Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while NEWP trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -50.93. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs ITRG Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 248.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while ITRG trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -147.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs PLG Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while PLG trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -33.30. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs VOXR Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while VOXR trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -77.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs GROY-WT Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while GROY-WT trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs ATLX Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while ATLX trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs AUMN Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while AUMN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AUMN's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.
MUX vs TRQ Comparison
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 575M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $10.84, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of -18.68, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.