Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MUFG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUFG | $15.47 | -0.83% | 179.4B | 14.32 | $1.08 | +1.69% |
| JPM | $294.90 | -0.45% | 810.8B | 15.13 | $19.49 | +1.80% |
| JPM-PD | $25.00 | -0.32% | 804.9B | 1.85 | $13.48 | +1.80% |
| JPM-PC | $25.40 | -0.20% | 801.7B | 1.88 | $13.48 | +1.80% |
| BAC-PL | $1,242.75 | -0.27% | 478.7B | 353.66 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
| BAC | $49.48 | +0.00% | 366.6B | 14.52 | $3.41 | +2.10% |
| BAC-PE | $21.50 | -0.69% | 356B | 6.12 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
| BAC-PK | $25.02 | -0.12% | 354.3B | 7.12 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
| BAC-PB | $25.31 | -0.12% | 353.8B | 7.21 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
| BML-PL | $20.82 | -0.48% | 352.7B | 5.92 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
Stock Comparison
MUFG vs JPM Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 810.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while JPM trades at $294.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check JPM's competition here
MUFG vs JPM-PD Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 804.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while JPM-PD trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check JPM-PD's competition here
MUFG vs JPM-PC Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 801.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while JPM-PC trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check JPM-PC's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PL Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 478.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PL trades at $1,242.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 353.66. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PL's competition here
MUFG vs BAC Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 366.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC trades at $49.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PE Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 356B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PE trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PE's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PK Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 354.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PK trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PK's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PB Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 353.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PB trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PB's competition here
MUFG vs BML-PL Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 352.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BML-PL trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BML-PL's competition here
MUFG vs BML-PH Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 347.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BML-PH trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BML-PH's competition here
MUFG vs BML-PG Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 347.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BML-PG trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BML-PG's competition here
MUFG vs BML-PJ Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 347.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BML-PJ trades at $21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BML-PJ's competition here
MUFG vs WFC-PC Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 259.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WFC-PC trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 61.28. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WFC-PC's competition here
MUFG vs WFC Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 256.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WFC trades at $80.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WFC's competition here
MUFG vs WFC-PL Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 252.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WFC-PL trades at $1,237.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 256.21. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WFC-PL's competition here
MUFG vs HSBC Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 226.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while HSBC trades at $65.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check HSBC's competition here
MUFG vs WFC-PY Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 202.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WFC-PY trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WFC-PY's competition here
MUFG vs WFC-PQ Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
MUFG vs RY Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 192.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while RY trades at $136.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check RY's competition here
MUFG vs WFC-PR Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WFC-PR's competition here
MUFG vs C Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 174.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while C trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas C's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check C's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PM Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 169.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PM trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PM's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PN Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PN trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PN's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PS Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PS trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PS's competition here
MUFG vs SAN Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 145.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while SAN trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check SAN's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PO Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PO trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PO's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PQ Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
MUFG vs TD Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 129.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while TD trades at $73.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check TD's competition here
MUFG vs BAC-PP Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 128.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BAC-PP trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BAC-PP's competition here
MUFG vs UBS Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while UBS trades at $40.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check UBS's competition here
MUFG vs C-PJ Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check C-PJ's competition here
MUFG vs BBVA Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BBVA trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BBVA's competition here
MUFG vs RY-PT Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check RY-PT's competition here
MUFG vs BMO Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BMO trades at $113.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BMO's competition here
MUFG vs ING Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while ING trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check ING's competition here
MUFG vs BCS Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BCS trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BCS's competition here
MUFG vs BNS Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while BNS trades at $57.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check BNS's competition here
MUFG vs NU Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while NU trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check NU's competition here
MUFG vs CM Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while CM trades at $72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check CM's competition here
MUFG vs WFC-PZ Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WFC-PZ trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
MUFG vs SMFG Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while SMFG trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check SMFG's competition here
MUFG vs WFC-PA Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WFC-PA trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WFC-PA's competition here
MUFG vs WFC-PD Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WFC-PD trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WFC-PD's competition here
MUFG vs JPM-PJ Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while JPM-PJ trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
MUFG vs JPM-PL Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while JPM-PL trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check JPM-PL's competition here
MUFG vs JPM-PK Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while JPM-PK trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check JPM-PK's competition here
MUFG vs JPM-PM Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while JPM-PM trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check JPM-PM's competition here
MUFG vs C-PK Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check C-PK's competition here
MUFG vs NWG Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while NWG trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check NWG's competition here
MUFG vs EWBC Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while EWBC trades at $104.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check EWBC's competition here
MUFG vs CS Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check CS's competition here
MUFG vs NTB Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while NTB trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check NTB's competition here
MUFG vs TANNL Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check TANNL's competition here
MUFG vs FRC-PL Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check FRC-PL's competition here
MUFG vs WBK Comparison August 2025
MUFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUFG stands at 179.4B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUFG is priced at $15.47, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUFG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.32, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, MUFG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MUFG is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUFG.Check WBK's competition here