Mechel PAO
Mechel PAO (MTL-P) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTL-P) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTL-P | $1.20 | +15.14% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NUE | $145.83 | +3.11% | 33.7B | 25.73 | $5.67 | +1.50% |
| MT | $33.65 | +0.18% | 25.6B | 21.44 | $1.57 | +1.44% |
| STLD | $130.83 | +3.15% | 19.4B | 18.99 | $6.89 | +1.47% |
| PKX | $60.07 | +0.00% | 18.4B | 30.33 | $1.98 | +1.75% |
| RS | $306.14 | +1.60% | 16.1B | 22.19 | $13.80 | +1.50% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.36% |
| TX | $31.80 | +1.18% | 6.2B | -17.63 | -$1.80 | +8.54% |
| CMC | $53.32 | +2.72% | 6B | 177.73 | $0.30 | +1.35% |
| GGB | $3.05 | -1.61% | 5.8B | 10.91 | $0.28 | +3.49% |
Stock Comparison
MTL-P vs NUE Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while NUE trades at $145.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check NUE's competition here
MTL-P vs MT Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while MT trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check MT's competition here
MTL-P vs STLD Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while STLD trades at $130.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check STLD's competition here
MTL-P vs PKX Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while PKX trades at $60.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check PKX's competition here
MTL-P vs RS Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while RS trades at $306.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check RS's competition here
MTL-P vs X Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check X's competition here
MTL-P vs TX Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while TX trades at $31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -17.63. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check TX's competition here
MTL-P vs CMC Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while CMC trades at $53.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 177.73. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check CMC's competition here
MTL-P vs GGB Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while GGB trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check GGB's competition here
MTL-P vs CLF Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while CLF trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check CLF's competition here
MTL-P vs SID Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while SID trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check SID's competition here
MTL-P vs WS Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while WS trades at $31.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check WS's competition here
MTL-P vs SIM Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while SIM trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check SIM's competition here
MTL-P vs SCHN Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check SCHN's competition here
MTL-P vs TMST Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check TMST's competition here
MTL-P vs RDUS Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check RDUS's competition here
MTL-P vs MTUS Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 714M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while MTUS trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -34.67. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check MTUS's competition here
MTL-P vs ASTL Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 653.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while ASTL trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check ASTL's competition here
MTL-P vs USAP Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check USAP's competition here
MTL-P vs MSB Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while MSB trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check MSB's competition here
MTL-P vs ZEUS Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 371.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while ZEUS trades at $33.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check ZEUS's competition here
MTL-P vs SYNL Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check SYNL's competition here
MTL-P vs ACNT Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 136.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while ACNT trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check ACNT's competition here
MTL-P vs LUD Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while LUD trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -281.50. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check LUD's competition here
MTL-P vs FRD Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while FRD trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check FRD's competition here
MTL-P vs KBSX Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while KBSX trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check KBSX's competition here
MTL-P vs HLP Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while HLP trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check HLP's competition here
MTL-P vs ASTLW Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while ASTLW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check ASTLW's competition here
MTL-P vs HUDI Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while HUDI trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check HUDI's competition here
MTL-P vs ZKIN Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while ZKIN trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check ZKIN's competition here
MTL-P vs INHD Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while INHD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check INHD's competition here
MTL-P vs MTL Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check MTL's competition here
MTL-P vs OSN Comparison July 2025
MTL-P plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL-P stands at 0. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTL-P is priced at $1.20, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL-P currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, MTL-P's ROE is +0.38%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL-P is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL-P.Check OSN's competition here