Wärtsilä Oyj Abp
Wärtsilä Oyj Abp (MTA.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTA.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTA.F | €34.09 | +0.47% | 20.3B | 31.33 | €1.10 | +2.93% |
| LAR0.DE | €251.45 | +5.06% | 289.4B | 51.32 | €4.51 | +0.38% |
| SIE.DE | €264.10 | +1.38% | 195.9B | 26.58 | €9.66 | +2.08% |
| SND.DE | €264.60 | +1.57% | 143.7B | 32.06 | €7.97 | +1.64% |
| ENR.DE | €174.32 | +2.60% | 143.4B | 66.28 | €2.53 | +0.42% |
| ACO5.F | €14.25 | +0.89% | 68.3B | 28.55 | €0.49 | +2.61% |
| PAE.DE | €96.08 | +0.36% | 49.9B | 24.70 | €3.84 | +2.46% |
| 4PN.DE | €54.12 | -1.06% | 45.7B | 37.99 | €1.44 | +1.46% |
| RWL.DE | €375.40 | +0.17% | 41.3B | 49.09 | €7.49 | +1.27% |
| KC4.DE | €52.88 | +1.38% | 27.3B | 34.12 | €1.55 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
MTA.F vs LAR0.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, LAR0.DE has a market cap of 289.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while LAR0.DE trades at €251.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas LAR0.DE's P/E ratio is 51.32. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAR0.DE's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to LAR0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check LAR0.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs SIE.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, SIE.DE has a market cap of 195.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while SIE.DE trades at €264.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas SIE.DE's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIE.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to SIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check SIE.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs SND.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, SND.DE has a market cap of 143.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while SND.DE trades at €264.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas SND.DE's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SND.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to SND.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check SND.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs ENR.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, ENR.DE has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while ENR.DE trades at €174.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas ENR.DE's P/E ratio is 66.28. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENR.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to ENR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check ENR.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs ACO5.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, ACO5.F has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while ACO5.F trades at €14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas ACO5.F's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACO5.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to ACO5.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check ACO5.F's competition here
MTA.F vs PAE.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, PAE.DE has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while PAE.DE trades at €96.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas PAE.DE's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAE.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to PAE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check PAE.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs 4PN.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 4PN.DE has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while 4PN.DE trades at €54.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas 4PN.DE's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 4PN.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to 4PN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check 4PN.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs RWL.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, RWL.DE has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while RWL.DE trades at €375.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas RWL.DE's P/E ratio is 49.09. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RWL.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to RWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check RWL.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs KC4.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, KC4.DE has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while KC4.DE trades at €52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas KC4.DE's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KC4.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to KC4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check KC4.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs VWSB.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, VWSB.DE has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while VWSB.DE trades at €26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas VWSB.DE's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VWSB.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to VWSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check VWSB.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs XY6.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, XY6.DE has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while XY6.DE trades at €92.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas XY6.DE's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XY6.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to XY6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check XY6.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs NDX1.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, NDX1.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while NDX1.DE trades at €43.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas NDX1.DE's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NDX1.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to NDX1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check NDX1.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs G1A.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, G1A.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while G1A.DE trades at €55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas G1A.DE's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to G1A.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to G1A.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check G1A.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs RAA.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, RAA.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while RAA.DE trades at €658.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas RAA.DE's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAA.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to RAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check RAA.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs KGX.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, KGX.DE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while KGX.DE trades at €44.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas KGX.DE's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KGX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to KGX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check KGX.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs 1IG.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 1IG.F has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while 1IG.F trades at €1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas 1IG.F's P/E ratio is 37.20. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1IG.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to 1IG.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check 1IG.F's competition here
MTA.F vs KRN.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, KRN.DE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while KRN.DE trades at €117.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas KRN.DE's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KRN.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to KRN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check KRN.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs JUN3.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, JUN3.DE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while JUN3.DE trades at €24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas JUN3.DE's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JUN3.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to JUN3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check JUN3.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs PFV.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, PFV.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while PFV.DE trades at €167.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas PFV.DE's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PFV.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to PFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check PFV.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs KSB.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, KSB.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while KSB.DE trades at €882.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas KSB.DE's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSB.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to KSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check KSB.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs DEZ.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, DEZ.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while DEZ.DE trades at €9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas DEZ.DE's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DEZ.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to DEZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check DEZ.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs KSB3.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, KSB3.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while KSB3.DE trades at €817.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas KSB3.DE's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSB3.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to KSB3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check KSB3.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs DUE.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, DUE.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while DUE.DE trades at €21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas DUE.DE's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DUE.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to DUE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check DUE.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs IJ8.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, IJ8.F has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while IJ8.F trades at €1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas IJ8.F's P/E ratio is -31.42. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IJ8.F's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to IJ8.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check IJ8.F's competition here
MTA.F vs IJ8.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, IJ8.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while IJ8.DE trades at €1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas IJ8.DE's P/E ratio is -31.12. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IJ8.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to IJ8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check IJ8.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs PO0.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, PO0.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while PO0.F trades at €4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas PO0.F's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PO0.F's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to PO0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check PO0.F's competition here
MTA.F vs NCH2.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, NCH2.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while NCH2.DE trades at €8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas NCH2.DE's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCH2.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to NCH2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check NCH2.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs 2GB.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, 2GB.DE has a market cap of 972.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while 2GB.DE trades at €53.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas 2GB.DE's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2GB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to 2GB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check 2GB.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs JST.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, JST.DE has a market cap of 899.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while JST.DE trades at €55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas JST.DE's P/E ratio is 76.25. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JST.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to JST.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check JST.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs MBH3.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, MBH3.F has a market cap of 840M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while MBH3.F trades at €169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas MBH3.F's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MBH3.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to MBH3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check MBH3.F's competition here
MTA.F vs AM3D.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, AM3D.DE has a market cap of 589.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while AM3D.DE trades at €18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas AM3D.DE's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AM3D.DE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to AM3D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check AM3D.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs D7G.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, D7G.F has a market cap of 531.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while D7G.F trades at €0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas D7G.F's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to D7G.F's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to D7G.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check D7G.F's competition here
MTA.F vs WSU.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, WSU.DE has a market cap of 527.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while WSU.DE trades at €40.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas WSU.DE's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WSU.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to WSU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check WSU.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs LPK.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, LPK.DE has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while LPK.DE trades at €20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas LPK.DE's P/E ratio is -27.46. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LPK.DE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to LPK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check LPK.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs STM.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, STM.DE has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while STM.DE trades at €18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas STM.DE's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STM.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to STM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check STM.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs HDD.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, HDD.DE has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while HDD.DE trades at €1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas HDD.DE's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HDD.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to HDD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check HDD.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs HG1.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, HG1.F has a market cap of 414.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while HG1.F trades at €26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas HG1.F's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HG1.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to HG1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check HG1.F's competition here
MTA.F vs F3C.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, F3C.DE has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while F3C.DE trades at €22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas F3C.DE's P/E ratio is 720.00. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to F3C.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to F3C.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check F3C.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs VQT.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, VQT.DE has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while VQT.DE trades at €25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas VQT.DE's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VQT.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to VQT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check VQT.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs S9I.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, S9I.DE has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while S9I.DE trades at €53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas S9I.DE's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to S9I.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MTA.F has daily volatility of 2.04 and S9I.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check S9I.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs SEW.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, SEW.F has a market cap of 308.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while SEW.F trades at €14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas SEW.F's P/E ratio is 750.00. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEW.F's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to SEW.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check SEW.F's competition here
MTA.F vs SEW.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, SEW.DE has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while SEW.DE trades at €12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas SEW.DE's P/E ratio is -28.82. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to SEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check SEW.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs TTR1.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, TTR1.DE has a market cap of 197.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while TTR1.DE trades at €29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas TTR1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTR1.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to TTR1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check TTR1.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs AVES.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, AVES.DE has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while AVES.DE trades at €15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas AVES.DE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVES.DE's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to AVES.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check AVES.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs AAG.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, AAG.DE has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while AAG.DE trades at €12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas AAG.DE's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAG.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to AAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check AAG.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs MXHN.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, MXHN.DE has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while MXHN.DE trades at €3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas MXHN.DE's P/E ratio is 193.00. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MXHN.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to MXHN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check MXHN.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs SKB.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, SKB.DE has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while SKB.DE trades at €8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas SKB.DE's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKB.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to SKB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check SKB.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs DIS.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, DIS.DE has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while DIS.DE trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas DIS.DE's P/E ratio is 630.00. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DIS.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to DIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check DIS.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs SW1.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, SW1.DE has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while SW1.DE trades at €19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas SW1.DE's P/E ratio is -197.92. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SW1.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to SW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check SW1.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs RSL2.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, RSL2.DE has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while RSL2.DE trades at €12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas RSL2.DE's P/E ratio is -18.48. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RSL2.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to RSL2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check RSL2.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs H2O.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, H2O.DE has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while H2O.DE trades at €1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas H2O.DE's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to H2O.DE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to H2O.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check H2O.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs SNG.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, SNG.DE has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while SNG.DE trades at €4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas SNG.DE's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNG.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to SNG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check SNG.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs H2O.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, H2O.F has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while H2O.F trades at €1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas H2O.F's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to H2O.F's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to H2O.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check H2O.F's competition here
MTA.F vs DAR.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, DAR.DE has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while DAR.DE trades at €9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas DAR.DE's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAR.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to DAR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check DAR.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs ACO1.F Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, ACO1.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while ACO1.F trades at €36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas ACO1.F's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACO1.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is less volatile compared to ACO1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check ACO1.F's competition here
MTA.F vs KU2.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, KU2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while KU2.DE trades at €84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas KU2.DE's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KU2.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to KU2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check KU2.DE's competition here
MTA.F vs GTQ1.DE Comparison May 2026
MTA.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.F stands at 20.3B. In comparison, GTQ1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.F is priced at €34.09, while GTQ1.DE trades at €18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 31.33, whereas GTQ1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GTQ1.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.F is more volatile compared to GTQ1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.F.Check GTQ1.DE's competition here