PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See PAE.DE's competitors and their performance on the XETRA and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for PAE.DE and its XETRA peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAE.DE | €112.50 | +1.81% | 59.1B | 27.39 | €4.10 | +2.10% |
| SIE.DE | €281.20 | +1.88% | 213.7B | 28.15 | €9.96 | +1.91% |
| SND.DE | €293.90 | -0.14% | 167.2B | 31.50 | €9.42 | +1.42% |
| ENR.DE | €150.20 | -1.56% | 131.2B | 48.31 | €3.17 | +0.46% |
| 4PN.DE | €52.00 | -0.15% | 42.8B | 13.34 | €3.89 | +1.57% |
| RWL.DE | €371.00 | +0.34% | 41.7B | 40.27 | €9.30 | +1.26% |
| KC4.DE | €52.88 | +1.38% | 27.3B | 34.12 | €1.55 | +2.54% |
| VWSB.DE | €28.05 | -1.02% | 27.2B | 24.74 | €1.12 | +0.36% |
| 4PG.DE | €61.47 | +0.10% | 23.4B | 19.18 | €3.21 | +2.39% |
| XY6.DE | €97.24 | -1.16% | 22.8B | 25.96 | €3.76 | +1.46% |
Stock Comparison
Siemens AG (XETRA: SIE.DE)
PAE.DE vs SIE.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SIE.DE has a market cap of 213.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while SIE.DE trades at €281.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas SIE.DE's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIE.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to SIE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check SIE.DE's competition here
Schneider Electric S.E. (XETRA: SND.DE)
PAE.DE vs SND.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SND.DE has a market cap of 167.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while SND.DE trades at €293.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas SND.DE's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SND.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to SND.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check SND.DE's competition here
Siemens Energy AG (XETRA: ENR.DE)
PAE.DE vs ENR.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ENR.DE has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while ENR.DE trades at €150.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas ENR.DE's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENR.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to ENR.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check ENR.DE's competition here
Carrier Global Corp. (XETRA: 4PN.DE)
PAE.DE vs 4PN.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, 4PN.DE has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while 4PN.DE trades at €52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas 4PN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4PN.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to 4PN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check 4PN.DE's competition here
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (XETRA: RWL.DE)
PAE.DE vs RWL.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, RWL.DE has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while RWL.DE trades at €371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas RWL.DE's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RWL.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to RWL.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check RWL.DE's competition here
KONE Oyj (XETRA: KC4.DE)
PAE.DE vs KC4.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KC4.DE has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while KC4.DE trades at €52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas KC4.DE's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KC4.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to KC4.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check KC4.DE's competition here
Vestas Wind Systems A/S (XETRA: VWSB.DE)
PAE.DE vs VWSB.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, VWSB.DE has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while VWSB.DE trades at €28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas VWSB.DE's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VWSB.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to VWSB.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check VWSB.DE's competition here
Otis Worldwide Corporation (XETRA: 4PG.DE)
PAE.DE vs 4PG.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, 4PG.DE has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while 4PG.DE trades at €61.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas 4PG.DE's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4PG.DE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to 4PG.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check 4PG.DE's competition here
Xylem Inc. (XETRA: XY6.DE)
PAE.DE vs XY6.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, XY6.DE has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while XY6.DE trades at €97.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas XY6.DE's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XY6.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to XY6.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check XY6.DE's competition here
GEA Group AG (XETRA: G1A.DE)
PAE.DE vs G1A.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, G1A.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while G1A.DE trades at €66.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas G1A.DE's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to G1A.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to G1A.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check G1A.DE's competition here
Nordex SE (XETRA: NDX1.DE)
PAE.DE vs NDX1.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, NDX1.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while NDX1.DE trades at €38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas NDX1.DE's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NDX1.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to NDX1.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check NDX1.DE's competition here
Andritz AG (XETRA: AZ2.DE)
PAE.DE vs AZ2.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AZ2.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while AZ2.DE trades at €80.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas AZ2.DE's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZ2.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to AZ2.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check AZ2.DE's competition here
Rational AG (XETRA: RAA.DE)
PAE.DE vs RAA.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, RAA.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while RAA.DE trades at €627.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas RAA.DE's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAA.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to RAA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check RAA.DE's competition here
Kion Group AG (XETRA: KGX.DE)
PAE.DE vs KGX.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KGX.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while KGX.DE trades at €40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas KGX.DE's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KGX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to KGX.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check KGX.DE's competition here
DMG Mori AG (XETRA: GIL.DE)
PAE.DE vs GIL.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GIL.DE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while GIL.DE trades at €47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas GIL.DE's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GIL.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to GIL.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check GIL.DE's competition here
Krones AG (XETRA: KRN.DE)
PAE.DE vs KRN.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KRN.DE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while KRN.DE trades at €116.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas KRN.DE's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KRN.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to KRN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check KRN.DE's competition here
Jungheinrich AG (XETRA: JUN3.DE)
PAE.DE vs JUN3.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, JUN3.DE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while JUN3.DE trades at €24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas JUN3.DE's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUN3.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to JUN3.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check JUN3.DE's competition here
KSB SE & Co. KGaA (XETRA: KSB.DE)
PAE.DE vs KSB.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KSB.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while KSB.DE trades at €920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas KSB.DE's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSB.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to KSB.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check KSB.DE's competition here
Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG (XETRA: PFV.DE)
PAE.DE vs PFV.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PFV.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while PFV.DE trades at €162.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas PFV.DE's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFV.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to PFV.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check PFV.DE's competition here
Deutz AG (XETRA: DEZ.DE)
PAE.DE vs DEZ.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DEZ.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while DEZ.DE trades at €10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas DEZ.DE's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DEZ.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to DEZ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check DEZ.DE's competition here
KSB SE & Co. KGaA (XETRA: KSB3.DE)
PAE.DE vs KSB3.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KSB3.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while KSB3.DE trades at €821.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas KSB3.DE's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSB3.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to KSB3.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check KSB3.DE's competition here
Wacker Neuson SE (XETRA: WAC.DE)
PAE.DE vs WAC.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, WAC.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while WAC.DE trades at €21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas WAC.DE's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAC.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to WAC.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check WAC.DE's competition here
Dürr Aktiengesellschaft (XETRA: DUE.DE)
PAE.DE vs DUE.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DUE.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while DUE.DE trades at €17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas DUE.DE's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DUE.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to DUE.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check DUE.DE's competition here
2G Energy AG (XETRA: 2GB.DE)
PAE.DE vs 2GB.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, 2GB.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while 2GB.DE trades at €54.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas 2GB.DE's P/E ratio is 41.13. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2GB.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to 2GB.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check 2GB.DE's competition here
ITM Power Plc (XETRA: IJ8.DE)
PAE.DE vs IJ8.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, IJ8.DE has a market cap of 869M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while IJ8.DE trades at €1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas IJ8.DE's P/E ratio is -21.76. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IJ8.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to IJ8.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check IJ8.DE's competition here
NORMA Group SE (XETRA: NOEJ.DE)
PAE.DE vs NOEJ.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, NOEJ.DE has a market cap of 640.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while NOEJ.DE trades at €19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas NOEJ.DE's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOEJ.DE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to NOEJ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check NOEJ.DE's competition here
SLM Solutions Group AG (XETRA: AM3D.DE)
PAE.DE vs AM3D.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AM3D.DE has a market cap of 589.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while AM3D.DE trades at €18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas AM3D.DE's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AM3D.DE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to AM3D.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check AM3D.DE's competition here
WashTec AG (XETRA: WSU.DE)
PAE.DE vs WSU.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, WSU.DE has a market cap of 516.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while WSU.DE trades at €38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas WSU.DE's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WSU.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to WSU.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check WSU.DE's competition here
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG (XETRA: HDD.DE)
PAE.DE vs HDD.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HDD.DE has a market cap of 434.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while HDD.DE trades at €1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas HDD.DE's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HDD.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to HDD.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check HDD.DE's competition here
va-Q-tec AG (XETRA: VQT.DE)
PAE.DE vs VQT.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, VQT.DE has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while VQT.DE trades at €25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas VQT.DE's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VQT.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to VQT.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check VQT.DE's competition here
Stemmer Imaging AG (XETRA: S9I.DE)
PAE.DE vs S9I.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, S9I.DE has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while S9I.DE trades at €53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas S9I.DE's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to S9I.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is not fully comparable compared to S9I.DE. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check S9I.DE's competition here
LPKF Laser & Electronics AG (XETRA: LPK.DE)
PAE.DE vs LPK.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LPK.DE has a market cap of 319.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while LPK.DE trades at €12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas LPK.DE's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPK.DE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to LPK.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check LPK.DE's competition here
Semperit AG Holding (XETRA: SEW.DE)
PAE.DE vs SEW.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SEW.DE has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while SEW.DE trades at €12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas SEW.DE's P/E ratio is -28.82. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEW.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to SEW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check SEW.DE's competition here
technotrans SE (XETRA: TTR1.DE)
PAE.DE vs TTR1.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TTR1.DE has a market cap of 197.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while TTR1.DE trades at €28.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas TTR1.DE's P/E ratio is 38.83. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTR1.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to TTR1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check TTR1.DE's competition here
Aves One AG (XETRA: AVES.DE)
PAE.DE vs AVES.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AVES.DE has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while AVES.DE trades at €15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas AVES.DE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AVES.DE's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to AVES.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check AVES.DE's competition here
Aumann AG (XETRA: AAG.DE)
PAE.DE vs AAG.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AAG.DE has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while AAG.DE trades at €14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas AAG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAG.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to AAG.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check AAG.DE's competition here
Koenig & Bauer AG (XETRA: SKB.DE)
PAE.DE vs SKB.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SKB.DE has a market cap of 142.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while SKB.DE trades at €8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas SKB.DE's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKB.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to SKB.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check SKB.DE's competition here
MAX Automation SE (XETRA: MXHN.DE)
PAE.DE vs MXHN.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MXHN.DE has a market cap of 140.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while MXHN.DE trades at €3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas MXHN.DE's P/E ratio is -30.14. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MXHN.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to MXHN.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check MXHN.DE's competition here
DVS Technology AG (XETRA: DIS.DE)
PAE.DE vs DIS.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DIS.DE has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while DIS.DE trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas DIS.DE's P/E ratio is 630.00. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DIS.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to DIS.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check DIS.DE's competition here
SHW AG (XETRA: SW1.DE)
PAE.DE vs SW1.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SW1.DE has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while SW1.DE trades at €19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas SW1.DE's P/E ratio is -197.92. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SW1.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to SW1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check SW1.DE's competition here
Singulus Technologies AG (XETRA: SNG.DE)
PAE.DE vs SNG.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SNG.DE has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while SNG.DE trades at €8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas SNG.DE's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNG.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to SNG.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check SNG.DE's competition here
Viscom AG (XETRA: V6C.DE)
PAE.DE vs V6C.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, V6C.DE has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while V6C.DE trades at €5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas V6C.DE's P/E ratio is -5.98. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to V6C.DE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to V6C.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check V6C.DE's competition here
Datron AG (XETRA: DAR.DE)
PAE.DE vs DAR.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DAR.DE has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while DAR.DE trades at €8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas DAR.DE's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DAR.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to DAR.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check DAR.DE's competition here
SMT Scharf AG (XETRA: S188.DE)
PAE.DE vs S188.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, S188.DE has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while S188.DE trades at €5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas S188.DE's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to S188.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to S188.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check S188.DE's competition here
Enapter AG (XETRA: H2O.DE)
PAE.DE vs H2O.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, H2O.DE has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while H2O.DE trades at €1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas H2O.DE's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to H2O.DE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to H2O.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check H2O.DE's competition here
Sbf AG (XETRA: CY1K.DE)
PAE.DE vs CY1K.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CY1K.DE has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while CY1K.DE trades at €3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas CY1K.DE's P/E ratio is -20.82. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CY1K.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is less volatile compared to CY1K.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check CY1K.DE's competition here
KUKA AG (XETRA: KU2.DE)
PAE.DE vs KU2.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KU2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while KU2.DE trades at €84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas KU2.DE's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KU2.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to KU2.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check KU2.DE's competition here
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, S.A. (XETRA: GTQ1.DE)
PAE.DE vs GTQ1.DE Comparison August 2026
PACCAR Inc (XETRA: PAE.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAE.DE stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GTQ1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAE.DE is priced at €112.50 on the XETRA, while GTQ1.DE trades at €18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.39, whereas GTQ1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAE.DE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTQ1.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAE.DE is more volatile compared to GTQ1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAE.DE.Check GTQ1.DE's competition here