MAX Automation SE (MXHN.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MXHN.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXHN.DE | €3.89 | -0.26% | 160.4M | 194.50 | €0.02 | N/A |
| LAR0.DE | €280.45 | -0.83% | 350.7B | 61.50 | €4.56 | +0.31% |
| SIE.DE | €264.30 | -1.38% | 201.6B | 27.33 | €9.67 | +2.02% |
| SND.DE | €263.45 | -2.66% | 148.1B | 33.06 | €7.97 | +1.59% |
| ENR.DE | €148.30 | -5.92% | 126.8B | 58.39 | €2.54 | +0.47% |
| ACO5.F | €14.50 | -1.76% | 70.7B | 29.59 | €0.49 | +2.53% |
| PAE.DE | €103.46 | +0.64% | 54.4B | 25.57 | €4.04 | +2.28% |
| 4PN.DE | €59.96 | +1.90% | 49.8B | 46.48 | €1.29 | +1.34% |
| RWL.DE | €398.30 | +1.76% | 44B | 47.77 | €8.28 | +1.19% |
| KC4.DE | €52.88 | +1.38% | 27.3B | 34.12 | €1.55 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
MXHN.DE vs LAR0.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, LAR0.DE has a market cap of 350.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while LAR0.DE trades at €280.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas LAR0.DE's P/E ratio is 61.50. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LAR0.DE's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to LAR0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check LAR0.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs SIE.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, SIE.DE has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while SIE.DE trades at €264.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas SIE.DE's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SIE.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to SIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check SIE.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs SND.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, SND.DE has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while SND.DE trades at €263.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas SND.DE's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SND.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to SND.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check SND.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs ENR.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, ENR.DE has a market cap of 126.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while ENR.DE trades at €148.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas ENR.DE's P/E ratio is 58.39. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENR.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to ENR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check ENR.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs ACO5.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, ACO5.F has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while ACO5.F trades at €14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas ACO5.F's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACO5.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to ACO5.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check ACO5.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs PAE.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, PAE.DE has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while PAE.DE trades at €103.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas PAE.DE's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAE.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to PAE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check PAE.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs 4PN.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, 4PN.DE has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while 4PN.DE trades at €59.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas 4PN.DE's P/E ratio is 46.48. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 4PN.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to 4PN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check 4PN.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs RWL.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, RWL.DE has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while RWL.DE trades at €398.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas RWL.DE's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWL.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to RWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check RWL.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs KC4.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, KC4.DE has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while KC4.DE trades at €52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas KC4.DE's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KC4.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to KC4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check KC4.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs XY6.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, XY6.DE has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while XY6.DE trades at €95.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas XY6.DE's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XY6.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to XY6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check XY6.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs VWSB.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, VWSB.DE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while VWSB.DE trades at €22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas VWSB.DE's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VWSB.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to VWSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check VWSB.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs MTA.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, MTA.F has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while MTA.F trades at €36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas MTA.F's P/E ratio is 32.77. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTA.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to MTA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check MTA.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs NDX1.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, NDX1.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while NDX1.DE trades at €39.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas NDX1.DE's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NDX1.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to NDX1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check NDX1.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs G1A.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, G1A.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while G1A.DE trades at €54.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas G1A.DE's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to G1A.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to G1A.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check G1A.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs RAA.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, RAA.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while RAA.DE trades at €654.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas RAA.DE's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RAA.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to RAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check RAA.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs KGX.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, KGX.DE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while KGX.DE trades at €38.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas KGX.DE's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KGX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to KGX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check KGX.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs KRN.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, KRN.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while KRN.DE trades at €113.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas KRN.DE's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KRN.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to KRN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check KRN.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs 1IG.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, 1IG.F has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while 1IG.F trades at €1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas 1IG.F's P/E ratio is 34.83. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1IG.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to 1IG.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check 1IG.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs JUN3.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, JUN3.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while JUN3.DE trades at €22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas JUN3.DE's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JUN3.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to JUN3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check JUN3.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs PFV.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, PFV.DE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while PFV.DE trades at €168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas PFV.DE's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PFV.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to PFV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check PFV.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs KSB.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, KSB.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while KSB.DE trades at €878.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas KSB.DE's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KSB.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to KSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check KSB.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs DEZ.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, DEZ.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while DEZ.DE trades at €9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas DEZ.DE's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DEZ.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to DEZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check DEZ.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs KSB3.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, KSB3.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while KSB3.DE trades at €798.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas KSB3.DE's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KSB3.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to KSB3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check KSB3.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs DUE.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, DUE.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while DUE.DE trades at €19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas DUE.DE's P/E ratio is -27.77. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DUE.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to DUE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check DUE.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs PO0.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, PO0.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while PO0.F trades at €4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas PO0.F's P/E ratio is -17.83. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PO0.F's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to PO0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check PO0.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs 2GB.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, 2GB.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while 2GB.DE trades at €62.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas 2GB.DE's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 2GB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to 2GB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check 2GB.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs IJ8.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, IJ8.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while IJ8.F trades at €1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas IJ8.F's P/E ratio is -25.67. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IJ8.F's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to IJ8.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check IJ8.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs IJ8.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, IJ8.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while IJ8.DE trades at €1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas IJ8.DE's P/E ratio is -25.10. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IJ8.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to IJ8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check IJ8.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs NCH2.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, NCH2.DE has a market cap of 958.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while NCH2.DE trades at €7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas NCH2.DE's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NCH2.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to NCH2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check NCH2.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs JST.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, JST.DE has a market cap of 875.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while JST.DE trades at €53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas JST.DE's P/E ratio is 74.17. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JST.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to JST.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check JST.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs MBH3.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, MBH3.F has a market cap of 872.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while MBH3.F trades at €174.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas MBH3.F's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MBH3.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is more volatile compared to MBH3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check MBH3.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs AM3D.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, AM3D.DE has a market cap of 589.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while AM3D.DE trades at €18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas AM3D.DE's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AM3D.DE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is more volatile compared to AM3D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check AM3D.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs WSU.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, WSU.DE has a market cap of 508.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while WSU.DE trades at €38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas WSU.DE's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WSU.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to WSU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check WSU.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs LPK.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, LPK.DE has a market cap of 471.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while LPK.DE trades at €19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas LPK.DE's P/E ratio is -27.11. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LPK.DE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to LPK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check LPK.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs D7G.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, D7G.F has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while D7G.F trades at €0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas D7G.F's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to D7G.F's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to D7G.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check D7G.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs STM.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, STM.DE has a market cap of 429.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while STM.DE trades at €17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas STM.DE's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STM.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to STM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check STM.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs HDD.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, HDD.DE has a market cap of 413M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while HDD.DE trades at €1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas HDD.DE's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HDD.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to HDD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check HDD.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs HG1.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, HG1.F has a market cap of 404.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while HG1.F trades at €25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas HG1.F's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HG1.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to HG1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check HG1.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs VQT.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, VQT.DE has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while VQT.DE trades at €25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas VQT.DE's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VQT.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to VQT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check VQT.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs F3C.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, F3C.DE has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while F3C.DE trades at €19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas F3C.DE's P/E ratio is 663.33. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to F3C.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to F3C.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check F3C.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs S9I.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, S9I.DE has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while S9I.DE trades at €53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas S9I.DE's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to S9I.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MXHN.DE has daily volatility of 0.26 and S9I.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check S9I.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs SEW.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, SEW.F has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while SEW.F trades at €14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas SEW.F's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEW.F's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is more volatile compared to SEW.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check SEW.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs SEW.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, SEW.DE has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while SEW.DE trades at €12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas SEW.DE's P/E ratio is -28.82. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is more volatile compared to SEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check SEW.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs TTR1.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, TTR1.DE has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while TTR1.DE trades at €31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas TTR1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TTR1.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to TTR1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check TTR1.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs AVES.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, AVES.DE has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while AVES.DE trades at €15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas AVES.DE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVES.DE's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to AVES.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check AVES.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs AAG.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, AAG.DE has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while AAG.DE trades at €14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas AAG.DE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AAG.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to AAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check AAG.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs SKB.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, SKB.DE has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while SKB.DE trades at €9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas SKB.DE's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKB.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to SKB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check SKB.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs DIS.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, DIS.DE has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while DIS.DE trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas DIS.DE's P/E ratio is 630.00. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DIS.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is more volatile compared to DIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check DIS.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs SW1.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, SW1.DE has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while SW1.DE trades at €19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas SW1.DE's P/E ratio is -197.92. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SW1.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to SW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check SW1.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs RSL2.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, RSL2.DE has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while RSL2.DE trades at €13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas RSL2.DE's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RSL2.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to RSL2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check RSL2.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs SNG.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, SNG.DE has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while SNG.DE trades at €6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas SNG.DE's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNG.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to SNG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check SNG.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs H2O.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, H2O.F has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while H2O.F trades at €1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas H2O.F's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to H2O.F's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to H2O.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check H2O.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs H2O.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, H2O.DE has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while H2O.DE trades at €1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas H2O.DE's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to H2O.DE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to H2O.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check H2O.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs DAR.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, DAR.DE has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while DAR.DE trades at €8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas DAR.DE's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DAR.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to DAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check DAR.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs GTQ1.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, GTQ1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while GTQ1.DE trades at €18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas GTQ1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GTQ1.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to GTQ1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check GTQ1.DE's competition here
MXHN.DE vs ACO1.F Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, ACO1.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while ACO1.F trades at €36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas ACO1.F's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACO1.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to ACO1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check ACO1.F's competition here
MXHN.DE vs KU2.DE Comparison June 2026
MXHN.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MXHN.DE stands at 160.4M. In comparison, KU2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MXHN.DE is priced at €3.89, while KU2.DE trades at €84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MXHN.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 194.50, whereas KU2.DE's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, MXHN.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KU2.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MXHN.DE is less volatile compared to KU2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MXHN.DE.Check KU2.DE's competition here