R. Stahl AG
R. Stahl AG (RSL2.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RSL2.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSL2.DE | €12.40 | +1.64% | 78.6M | -18.48 | -€0.66 | N/A |
| LAR0.DE | €241.00 | +0.69% | 289.4B | 51.32 | €4.51 | +0.38% |
| SIE.DE | €259.50 | -0.38% | 195.9B | 26.58 | €9.66 | +2.08% |
| SND.DE | €258.50 | -0.77% | 143.7B | 32.06 | €7.97 | +1.64% |
| ENR.DE | €171.26 | +0.80% | 143.4B | 66.28 | €2.53 | +0.42% |
| ACO5.F | €14.06 | -0.46% | 68.3B | 28.55 | €0.49 | +2.61% |
| PAE.DE | €94.01 | -1.81% | 49.9B | 24.70 | €3.84 | +2.46% |
| 4PN.DE | €54.70 | +0.00% | 45.7B | 37.99 | €1.44 | +1.46% |
| RWL.DE | €362.60 | -3.24% | 41.3B | 49.09 | €7.49 | +1.27% |
| KC4.DE | €52.88 | +1.38% | 27.3B | 34.12 | €1.55 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
RSL2.DE vs LAR0.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, LAR0.DE has a market cap of 289.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while LAR0.DE trades at €241.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas LAR0.DE's P/E ratio is 51.32. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LAR0.DE's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to LAR0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check LAR0.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs SIE.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, SIE.DE has a market cap of 195.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while SIE.DE trades at €259.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas SIE.DE's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIE.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to SIE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check SIE.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs SND.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, SND.DE has a market cap of 143.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while SND.DE trades at €258.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas SND.DE's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SND.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to SND.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check SND.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs ENR.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, ENR.DE has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while ENR.DE trades at €171.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas ENR.DE's P/E ratio is 66.28. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENR.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to ENR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check ENR.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs ACO5.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, ACO5.F has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while ACO5.F trades at €14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas ACO5.F's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACO5.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to ACO5.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check ACO5.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs PAE.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, PAE.DE has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while PAE.DE trades at €94.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas PAE.DE's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAE.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to PAE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check PAE.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs 4PN.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, 4PN.DE has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while 4PN.DE trades at €54.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas 4PN.DE's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4PN.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to 4PN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check 4PN.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs RWL.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, RWL.DE has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while RWL.DE trades at €362.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas RWL.DE's P/E ratio is 49.09. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWL.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to RWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check RWL.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs KC4.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, KC4.DE has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while KC4.DE trades at €52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas KC4.DE's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KC4.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to KC4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check KC4.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs VWSB.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, VWSB.DE has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while VWSB.DE trades at €26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas VWSB.DE's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VWSB.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to VWSB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check VWSB.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs XY6.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, XY6.DE has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while XY6.DE trades at €91.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas XY6.DE's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XY6.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to XY6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check XY6.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs MTA.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, MTA.F has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while MTA.F trades at €33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas MTA.F's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTA.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to MTA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check MTA.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs NDX1.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, NDX1.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while NDX1.DE trades at €43.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas NDX1.DE's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NDX1.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to NDX1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check NDX1.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs G1A.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, G1A.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while G1A.DE trades at €55.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas G1A.DE's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to G1A.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to G1A.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check G1A.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs RAA.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, RAA.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while RAA.DE trades at €649.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas RAA.DE's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAA.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to RAA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check RAA.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs KGX.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, KGX.DE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while KGX.DE trades at €43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas KGX.DE's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KGX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to KGX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check KGX.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs 1IG.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, 1IG.F has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while 1IG.F trades at €1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas 1IG.F's P/E ratio is 37.20. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1IG.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to 1IG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check 1IG.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs KRN.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, KRN.DE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while KRN.DE trades at €116.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas KRN.DE's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRN.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to KRN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check KRN.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs JUN3.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, JUN3.DE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while JUN3.DE trades at €24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas JUN3.DE's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JUN3.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to JUN3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check JUN3.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs PFV.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, PFV.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while PFV.DE trades at €167.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas PFV.DE's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFV.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to PFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check PFV.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs KSB.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, KSB.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while KSB.DE trades at €872.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas KSB.DE's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KSB.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to KSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check KSB.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs DEZ.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, DEZ.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while DEZ.DE trades at €9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas DEZ.DE's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEZ.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to DEZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check DEZ.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs KSB3.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, KSB3.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while KSB3.DE trades at €809.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas KSB3.DE's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KSB3.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to KSB3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check KSB3.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs DUE.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, DUE.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while DUE.DE trades at €20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas DUE.DE's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DUE.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to DUE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check DUE.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs IJ8.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, IJ8.F has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while IJ8.F trades at €1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas IJ8.F's P/E ratio is -31.42. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IJ8.F's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to IJ8.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check IJ8.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs IJ8.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, IJ8.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while IJ8.DE trades at €1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas IJ8.DE's P/E ratio is -31.12. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IJ8.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to IJ8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check IJ8.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs PO0.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, PO0.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while PO0.F trades at €3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas PO0.F's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PO0.F's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to PO0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check PO0.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs NCH2.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, NCH2.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while NCH2.DE trades at €8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas NCH2.DE's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCH2.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to NCH2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check NCH2.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs 2GB.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, 2GB.DE has a market cap of 972.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while 2GB.DE trades at €54.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas 2GB.DE's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2GB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to 2GB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check 2GB.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs JST.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, JST.DE has a market cap of 899.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while JST.DE trades at €55.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas JST.DE's P/E ratio is 76.25. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JST.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to JST.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check JST.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs MBH3.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, MBH3.F has a market cap of 840M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while MBH3.F trades at €168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas MBH3.F's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MBH3.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to MBH3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check MBH3.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs AM3D.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, AM3D.DE has a market cap of 589.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while AM3D.DE trades at €18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas AM3D.DE's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AM3D.DE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to AM3D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check AM3D.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs D7G.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, D7G.F has a market cap of 531.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while D7G.F trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas D7G.F's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to D7G.F's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to D7G.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check D7G.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs WSU.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, WSU.DE has a market cap of 527.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while WSU.DE trades at €39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas WSU.DE's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSU.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to WSU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check WSU.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs LPK.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, LPK.DE has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while LPK.DE trades at €20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas LPK.DE's P/E ratio is -27.46. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LPK.DE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to LPK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check LPK.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs STM.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, STM.DE has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while STM.DE trades at €18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas STM.DE's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STM.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to STM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check STM.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs HDD.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, HDD.DE has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while HDD.DE trades at €1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas HDD.DE's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HDD.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to HDD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check HDD.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs HG1.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, HG1.F has a market cap of 414.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while HG1.F trades at €25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas HG1.F's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HG1.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to HG1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check HG1.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs F3C.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, F3C.DE has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while F3C.DE trades at €21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas F3C.DE's P/E ratio is 720.00. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to F3C.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to F3C.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check F3C.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs VQT.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, VQT.DE has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while VQT.DE trades at €25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas VQT.DE's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VQT.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to VQT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check VQT.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs S9I.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, S9I.DE has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while S9I.DE trades at €53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas S9I.DE's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to S9I.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSL2.DE has daily volatility of 2.43 and S9I.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check S9I.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs SEW.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, SEW.F has a market cap of 308.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while SEW.F trades at €14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas SEW.F's P/E ratio is 750.00. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEW.F's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to SEW.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check SEW.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs SEW.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, SEW.DE has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while SEW.DE trades at €12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas SEW.DE's P/E ratio is -28.82. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to SEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check SEW.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs TTR1.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, TTR1.DE has a market cap of 197.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while TTR1.DE trades at €28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas TTR1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTR1.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to TTR1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check TTR1.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs AVES.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, AVES.DE has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while AVES.DE trades at €15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas AVES.DE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVES.DE's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to AVES.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check AVES.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs AAG.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, AAG.DE has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while AAG.DE trades at €12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas AAG.DE's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAG.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to AAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check AAG.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs MXHN.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, MXHN.DE has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while MXHN.DE trades at €3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas MXHN.DE's P/E ratio is 193.00. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MXHN.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to MXHN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check MXHN.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs SKB.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, SKB.DE has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while SKB.DE trades at €8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas SKB.DE's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKB.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to SKB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check SKB.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs DIS.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, DIS.DE has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while DIS.DE trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas DIS.DE's P/E ratio is 630.00. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIS.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to DIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check DIS.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs SW1.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, SW1.DE has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while SW1.DE trades at €19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas SW1.DE's P/E ratio is -197.92. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SW1.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to SW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check SW1.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs H2O.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, H2O.DE has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while H2O.DE trades at €1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas H2O.DE's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to H2O.DE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to H2O.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check H2O.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs SNG.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, SNG.DE has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while SNG.DE trades at €4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas SNG.DE's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNG.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to SNG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check SNG.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs H2O.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, H2O.F has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while H2O.F trades at €1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas H2O.F's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to H2O.F's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to H2O.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check H2O.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs DAR.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, DAR.DE has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while DAR.DE trades at €9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas DAR.DE's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAR.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to DAR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check DAR.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs KU2.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, KU2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while KU2.DE trades at €84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas KU2.DE's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KU2.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to KU2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check KU2.DE's competition here
RSL2.DE vs ACO1.F Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, ACO1.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while ACO1.F trades at €36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas ACO1.F's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACO1.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is less volatile compared to ACO1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check ACO1.F's competition here
RSL2.DE vs GTQ1.DE Comparison May 2026
RSL2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSL2.DE stands at 78.6M. In comparison, GTQ1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RSL2.DE is priced at €12.40, while GTQ1.DE trades at €18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSL2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -18.48, whereas GTQ1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RSL2.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTQ1.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RSL2.DE is more volatile compared to GTQ1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSL2.DE.Check GTQ1.DE's competition here