ArcelorMittal S.A.
ArcelorMittal S.A. MT Peers
See (MT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MT | $31.58 | +1.02% | 24B | 20.11 | $1.57 | +1.53% |
| NUE | $129.54 | -1.44% | 29.9B | 22.89 | $5.66 | +1.68% |
| STLD | $128.01 | -2.44% | 19B | 16.82 | $7.61 | +1.49% |
| RS | $313.90 | -0.92% | 16.5B | 22.33 | $14.06 | +1.46% |
| PKX | $48.49 | +1.70% | 14.7B | 24.12 | $2.01 | +2.17% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.36% |
| TX | $30.10 | -2.11% | 5.9B | -16.72 | -$1.80 | +8.84% |
| GGB | $2.92 | +1.74% | 5.7B | 10.41 | $0.28 | +3.62% |
| CMC | $48.91 | -2.22% | 5.5B | 162.97 | $0.30 | +1.46% |
| CLF | $7.60 | +2.43% | 3.8B | -3.13 | -$2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MT vs NUE Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while NUE trades at $129.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs STLD Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while STLD trades at $128.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs RS Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while RS trades at $313.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs PKX Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while PKX trades at $48.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs X Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs TX Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while TX trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -16.72. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs GGB Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while GGB trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs CMC Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while CMC trades at $48.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 162.97. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs CLF Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while CLF trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs SID Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while SID trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs WS Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while WS trades at $29.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs SIM Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while SIM trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs SCHN Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs TMST Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs RDUS Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 831.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while RDUS trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs ASTL Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 723M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while ASTL trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs MTUS Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while MTUS trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -31.43. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs USAP Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs ZEUS Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 363.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while ZEUS trades at $32.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs MSB Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 314.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while MSB trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs SYNL Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs ACNT Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while ACNT trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -15.01. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs FRD Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while FRD trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs LUD Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while LUD trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -252.50. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs KBSX Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while KBSX trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -25.29. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs HLP Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while HLP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs ASTLW Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while ASTLW trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs HUDI Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while HUDI trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs ZKIN Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while ZKIN trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs INHD Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while INHD trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs MTL-P Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs OSN Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.
MT vs MTL Comparison
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 24B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $31.58, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.