Monster Beverage Corporation
Monster Beverage Corporation MNST Peers
See (MNST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | $63.44 | +0.70% | 61.9B | 41.74 | $1.52 | N/A |
| KO | $71.34 | +0.61% | 307.1B | 28.65 | $2.49 | +2.76% |
| PEP | $130.00 | -0.85% | 178.2B | 19.12 | $6.80 | +5.27% |
| KDP | $32.77 | +0.64% | 44.5B | 29.79 | $1.10 | +2.77% |
| CCEP | $93.31 | +1.40% | 43B | 26.43 | $3.53 | +2.39% |
| KOF | $97.01 | +0.11% | 20.4B | 16.44 | $5.90 | +0.17% |
| PRMB | $31.48 | +2.22% | 11.8B | -286.14 | -$0.11 | +4.12% |
| CELH | $40.60 | +1.30% | 10.5B | 123.03 | $0.33 | N/A |
| COKE | $108.67 | +2.35% | 9.5B | 16.93 | $6.42 | +4.85% |
| FIZZ | $46.51 | +1.62% | 4.4B | 23.37 | $1.99 | +7.04% |
Stock Comparison
MNST vs KO Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 307.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while KO trades at $71.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs PEP Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while PEP trades at $130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs KDP Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while KDP trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs CCEP Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while CCEP trades at $93.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs KOF Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while KOF trades at $97.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs PRMB Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while PRMB trades at $31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -286.14. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs CELH Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while CELH trades at $40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 123.03. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs COKE Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while COKE trades at $108.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs FIZZ Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while FIZZ trades at $46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs PRMW Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs AKO-B Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while AKO-B trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs AKO-A Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while AKO-A trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs COCO Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while COCO trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs OTLY Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 373.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while OTLY trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs ZVIA Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while ZVIA trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs BRFH Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while BRFH trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs REED Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while REED trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs SHOT Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while SHOT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs WTER Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 276K. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while WTER trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs NBEV Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.9B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $63.44, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.74, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.