Monster Beverage Corporation
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | $61.39 | +1.96% | 59.9B | 40.39 | $1.52 | N/A |
| KO | $69.38 | +1.89% | 298.6B | 24.60 | $2.82 | +2.88% |
| PEP | $143.89 | +1.64% | 197.1B | 26.22 | $5.49 | +3.83% |
| KDP | $33.85 | +2.67% | 46B | 29.96 | $1.13 | +2.73% |
| CCEP | $99.25 | +1.11% | 45.7B | 27.42 | $3.62 | +2.24% |
| KOF | $83.22 | -0.05% | 17.5B | 22.48 | $3.70 | +3.89% |
| CELH | $47.44 | +1.02% | 12.2B | 143.76 | $0.33 | N/A |
| PRMB | $28.25 | -0.28% | 10.6B | -256.73 | -$0.11 | +4.26% |
| COKE | $114.78 | -1.21% | 10B | 17.11 | $6.71 | +0.87% |
| FIZZ | $46.99 | +1.95% | 4.4B | 23.61 | $1.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MNST vs KO Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 298.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while KO trades at $69.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KO's competition here
MNST vs PEP Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while PEP trades at $143.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PEP's competition here
MNST vs KDP Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while KDP trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KDP's competition here
MNST vs CCEP Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while CCEP trades at $99.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CCEP's competition here
MNST vs KOF Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while KOF trades at $83.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KOF's competition here
MNST vs CELH Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while CELH trades at $47.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 143.76. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CELH's competition here
MNST vs PRMB Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while PRMB trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -256.73. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMB's competition here
MNST vs COKE Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while COKE trades at $114.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COKE's competition here
MNST vs FIZZ Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while FIZZ trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check FIZZ's competition here
MNST vs PRMW Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMW's competition here
MNST vs AKO-A Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while AKO-A trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-A's competition here
MNST vs AKO-B Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while AKO-B trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-B's competition here
MNST vs COCO Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while COCO trades at $36.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COCO's competition here
MNST vs OTLY Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 440.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while OTLY trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check OTLY's competition here
MNST vs ZVIA Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 212.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while ZVIA trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check ZVIA's competition here
MNST vs SHOT Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while SHOT trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -15.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check SHOT's competition here
MNST vs BRFH Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while BRFH trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BRFH's competition here
MNST vs REED Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while REED trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check REED's competition here
MNST vs WTER Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 242.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while WTER trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check WTER's competition here
MNST vs NBEV Comparison July 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 59.9B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $61.39, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.39, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check NBEV's competition here