Monster Beverage Corporation
Monster Beverage Corporation MNST Peers
See (MNST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | $62.64 | +1.51% | 61.1B | 41.21 | $1.52 | N/A |
| KO | $70.75 | +0.60% | 304.5B | 28.41 | $2.49 | +2.82% |
| PEP | $132.04 | +0.76% | 181B | 19.42 | $6.80 | +4.16% |
| KDP | $33.06 | +0.64% | 44.9B | 30.05 | $1.10 | +2.78% |
| CCEP | $92.72 | +1.78% | 42.7B | 25.76 | $3.60 | +2.40% |
| KOF | $96.73 | +2.48% | 20.3B | 16.20 | $5.97 | +3.30% |
| CELH | $46.39 | +1.09% | 12B | 140.58 | $0.33 | N/A |
| PRMB | $29.62 | +0.92% | 11.1B | -269.09 | -$0.11 | +4.07% |
| COKE | $111.65 | +0.18% | 9.7B | 17.39 | $6.42 | +4.76% |
| FIZZ | $43.24 | +2.01% | 4B | 21.73 | $1.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MNST vs KO Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 304.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while KO trades at $70.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs PEP Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 181B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while PEP trades at $132.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs KDP Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while KDP trades at $33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs CCEP Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while CCEP trades at $92.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs KOF Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while KOF trades at $96.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs CELH Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while CELH trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 140.58. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs PRMB Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while PRMB trades at $29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -269.09. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs COKE Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while COKE trades at $111.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs FIZZ Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while FIZZ trades at $43.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs PRMW Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs AKO-B Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while AKO-B trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs AKO-A Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while AKO-A trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs COCO Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while COCO trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs OTLY Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 355.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while OTLY trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs ZVIA Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 212.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while ZVIA trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs BRFH Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while BRFH trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -16.86. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs REED Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while REED trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs SHOT Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while SHOT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs WTER Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while WTER trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.
MNST vs NBEV Comparison
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 61.1B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $62.64, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 41.21, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.