MKDWELL Tech Inc.
MKDWELL Tech Inc. MKDWW Peers
See (MKDWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKDWW | $0.01 | -8.00% | 38.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $69.19 | +2.88% | 15.1B | 11.31 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MBLY | $15.43 | +1.25% | 12.5B | -4.19 | -$3.68 | N/A |
| MGA | $37.86 | +1.45% | 10.7B | 9.44 | $4.01 | +5.07% |
| LKQ | $38.04 | -0.21% | 9.8B | 14.25 | $2.67 | +3.15% |
| ALV | $111.38 | +2.59% | 8.6B | 12.86 | $8.66 | +2.50% |
| ALSN | $95.39 | -3.48% | 8B | 11.04 | $8.64 | +1.08% |
| BWA | $33.35 | +0.85% | 7.3B | 23.49 | $1.42 | +1.32% |
| MOD | $95.95 | +2.38% | 5B | 27.03 | $3.55 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MKDWW vs APTV-PA Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs APTV Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while APTV trades at $69.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs MBLY Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while MBLY trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs MGA Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while MGA trades at $37.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs LKQ Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while LKQ trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs ALV Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while ALV trades at $111.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs ALSN Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while ALSN trades at $95.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs BWA Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while BWA trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs MOD Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while MOD trades at $95.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs GNTX Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while GNTX trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs LEA Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while LEA trades at $92.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs DORM Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while DORM trades at $124.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs BC-PB Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs BC-PA Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while BC-PA trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs GT Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while GT trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs DAN Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while DAN trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -73.29. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs HSAI Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while HSAI trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -1914.50. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs VC Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while VC trades at $92.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs QS Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while QS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs GTX Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while GTX trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs PHIN Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while PHIN trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs ADNT Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while ADNT trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs AEVA Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while AEVA trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs FOXF Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while FOXF trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs XPEL Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while XPEL trades at $37.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs THRM Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 859.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while THRM trades at $27.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs PLOW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 677.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while PLOW trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs SMP Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 672.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while SMP trades at $30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs ECX Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 571.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while ECX trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs GTXAP Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs AXL Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 512.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while AXL trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs MLR Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 506.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while MLR trades at $44.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs ALLG Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs MNRO Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while MNRO trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -67.05. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs CPS Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 385.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while CPS trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs SES Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 353.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while SES trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs HYLN Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while HYLN trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs HLLY-WT Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 256M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW and HLLY-WT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MKDWW vs STRT Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 249.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while STRT trades at $59.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs HLLY Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 248.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while HLLY trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs MPAA Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while MPAA trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs INVZW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 203.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while INVZW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs INVZ Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while INVZ trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs SRI Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while SRI trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs XL Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs LAZR Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while LAZR trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs CAAS Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while CAAS trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs KNDI Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while KNDI trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs GGR Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while GGR trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs WPRT Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while WPRT trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs CVGI Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while CVGI trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs SYPR Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while SYPR trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -101.00. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs MKDW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while MKDW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs NCNCW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW and NCNCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MKDWW vs NCNC Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs ECXWW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs AMV Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs LIDRW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW and LIDRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MKDWW vs WKSP Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while WKSP trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs LIDR Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while LIDR trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs INEO Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while INEO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs SAG Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs SUP Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while SUP trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs FRSX Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while FRSX trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs CREV Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while CREV trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs GGROW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs UFAB Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs WKSPW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs CREVW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 120.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while CREVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs HYZNW Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs VNE Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs HZN Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs MTOR Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.
MKDWW vs RMO Comparison
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 38.9M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.01, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.