MKDWELL Tech Inc.
MKDWELL Tech Inc. (MKDWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MKDWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKDWW | $0.02 | +3.36% | 2.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $65.06 | -5.22% | 14.3B | 10.73 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MGA | $41.36 | +0.88% | 11.6B | 10.30 | $4.01 | +4.66% |
| MBLY | $14.02 | -1.58% | 11.4B | -3.82 | -$3.65 | N/A |
| ALV | $111.14 | -0.37% | 8.5B | 12.09 | $9.12 | +2.52% |
| BWA | $38.18 | +3.75% | 8.2B | 35.39 | $1.06 | +1.18% |
| LKQ | $29.54 | +0.24% | 7.6B | 10.82 | $2.74 | +4.06% |
| ALSN | $88.16 | -2.12% | 7.4B | 10.15 | $8.64 | +1.19% |
| MOD | $136.16 | +1.19% | 7B | 38.30 | $3.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MKDWW vs APTV-PA Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check APTV-PA's competition here
MKDWW vs APTV Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while APTV trades at $65.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check APTV's competition here
MKDWW vs MGA Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while MGA trades at $41.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check MGA's competition here
MKDWW vs MBLY Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while MBLY trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check MBLY's competition here
MKDWW vs ALV Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while ALV trades at $111.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check ALV's competition here
MKDWW vs BWA Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while BWA trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check BWA's competition here
MKDWW vs LKQ Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while LKQ trades at $29.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check LKQ's competition here
MKDWW vs ALSN Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while ALSN trades at $88.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check ALSN's competition here
MKDWW vs MOD Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while MOD trades at $136.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check MOD's competition here
MKDWW vs GNTX Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while GNTX trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check GNTX's competition here
MKDWW vs LEA Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while LEA trades at $92.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check LEA's competition here
MKDWW vs QS Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while QS trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check QS's competition here
MKDWW vs BC-PA Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while BC-PA trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check BC-PA's competition here
MKDWW vs BC-PB Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check BC-PB's competition here
MKDWW vs DORM Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while DORM trades at $120.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check DORM's competition here
MKDWW vs VC Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while VC trades at $111.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check VC's competition here
MKDWW vs GT Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while GT trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check GT's competition here
MKDWW vs GTX Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while GTX trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check GTX's competition here
MKDWW vs HSAI Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while HSAI trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -1873.00. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check HSAI's competition here
MKDWW vs DAN Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while DAN trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -65.15. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check DAN's competition here
MKDWW vs PHIN Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while PHIN trades at $49.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check PHIN's competition here
MKDWW vs ADNT Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while ADNT trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check ADNT's competition here
MKDWW vs FOXF Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while FOXF trades at $29.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check FOXF's competition here
MKDWW vs THRM Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while THRM trades at $32.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check THRM's competition here
MKDWW vs AEVA Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 871.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while AEVA trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -6.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check AEVA's competition here
MKDWW vs XPEL Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 871.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while XPEL trades at $33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check XPEL's competition here
MKDWW vs SMP Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 669.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while SMP trades at $31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check SMP's competition here
MKDWW vs PLOW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 647.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while PLOW trades at $28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check PLOW's competition here
MKDWW vs GTXAP Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check GTXAP's competition here
MKDWW vs ECX Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while ECX trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check ECX's competition here
MKDWW vs AXL Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 511.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while AXL trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check AXL's competition here
MKDWW vs ALLG Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check ALLG's competition here
MKDWW vs CPS Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 462.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while CPS trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CPS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check CPS's competition here
MKDWW vs MLR Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 460.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while MLR trades at $40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check MLR's competition here
MKDWW vs SES Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while SES trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check SES's competition here
MKDWW vs MNRO Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 422.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while MNRO trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check MNRO's competition here
MKDWW vs INVZW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while INVZW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check INVZW's competition here
MKDWW vs INVZ Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while INVZ trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check INVZ's competition here
MKDWW vs HLLY-WT Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
MKDWW vs STRT Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 258.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while STRT trades at $64.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check STRT's competition here
MKDWW vs HYLN Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while HYLN trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check HYLN's competition here
MKDWW vs HLLY Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while HLLY trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check HLLY's competition here
MKDWW vs SRI Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 204.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while SRI trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check SRI's competition here
MKDWW vs MPAA Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while MPAA trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check MPAA's competition here
MKDWW vs XL Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check XL's competition here
MKDWW vs LAZR Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while LAZR trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check LAZR's competition here
MKDWW vs CAAS Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while CAAS trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check CAAS's competition here
MKDWW vs GGR Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while GGR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check GGR's competition here
MKDWW vs KNDI Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while KNDI trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check KNDI's competition here
MKDWW vs LIDR Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while LIDR trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check LIDR's competition here
MKDWW vs LIDRW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while LIDRW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check LIDRW's competition here
MKDWW vs WPRT Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while WPRT trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check WPRT's competition here
MKDWW vs CVGI Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while CVGI trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check CVGI's competition here
MKDWW vs SYPR Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while SYPR trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -94.50. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check SYPR's competition here
MKDWW vs MKDW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while MKDW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check MKDW's competition here
MKDWW vs ECXWW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while ECXWW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check ECXWW's competition here
MKDWW vs NCNCW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check NCNCW's competition here
MKDWW vs NCNC Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check NCNC's competition here
MKDWW vs AMV Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check AMV's competition here
MKDWW vs WKSP Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while WKSP trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check WKSP's competition here
MKDWW vs SAG Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check SAG's competition here
MKDWW vs SUP Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check SUP's competition here
MKDWW vs INEO Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while INEO trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check INEO's competition here
MKDWW vs FRSX Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while FRSX trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check FRSX's competition here
MKDWW vs CREV Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while CREV trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check CREV's competition here
MKDWW vs GGROW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check GGROW's competition here
MKDWW vs UFAB Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check UFAB's competition here
MKDWW vs WKSPW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check WKSPW's competition here
MKDWW vs CREVW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 209.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while CREVW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check CREVW's competition here
MKDWW vs HYZNW Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check HYZNW's competition here
MKDWW vs RMO Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check RMO's competition here
MKDWW vs MTOR Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check MTOR's competition here
MKDWW vs HZN Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check HZN's competition here
MKDWW vs VNE Comparison August 2025
MKDWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDWW stands at 2.2M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDWW is priced at $0.02, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, MKDWW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDWW is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDWW.Check VNE's competition here