MKDWELL Tech Inc.
MKDWELL Tech Inc. MKDW Peers
See (MKDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKDW | $0.32 | -12.58% | 46.4M | -1.90 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $66.64 | +1.76% | 14.5B | 10.89 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MBLY | $16.88 | +2.33% | 13.7B | -4.55 | -$3.71 | N/A |
| MGA | $36.61 | +1.30% | 10.3B | 9.13 | $4.01 | +5.24% |
| LKQ | $39.09 | +0.31% | 10.1B | 14.70 | $2.66 | +3.08% |
| ALSN | $103.58 | +1.03% | 8.7B | 11.99 | $8.64 | +1.00% |
| ALV | $105.68 | +0.48% | 8.2B | 12.20 | $8.66 | +2.63% |
| BWA | $32.30 | +0.44% | 7.1B | 22.75 | $1.42 | +1.36% |
| MOD | $93.65 | +1.50% | 4.9B | 27.38 | $3.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MKDW vs APTV-PA Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs APTV Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while APTV trades at $66.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs MBLY Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while MBLY trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs MGA Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while MGA trades at $36.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs LKQ Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while LKQ trades at $39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs ALSN Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while ALSN trades at $103.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs ALV Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while ALV trades at $105.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs BWA Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while BWA trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs MOD Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while MOD trades at $93.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs GNTX Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while GNTX trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs LEA Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while LEA trades at $88.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs DORM Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while DORM trades at $126.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs BC-PB Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs BC-PA Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while BC-PA trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs GT Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while GT trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs HSAI Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while HSAI trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2000.00. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs DAN Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while DAN trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -71.92. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs QS Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while QS trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs VC Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while VC trades at $83.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs GTX Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while GTX trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs PHIN Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while PHIN trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs ADNT Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while ADNT trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs AEVA Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while AEVA trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs FOXF Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while FOXF trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs XPEL Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while XPEL trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs THRM Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 834.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while THRM trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs SMP Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 651.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while SMP trades at $29.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs PLOW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while PLOW trades at $27.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs GTXAP Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs ECX Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 531M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while ECX trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs MLR Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 522.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while MLR trades at $45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs AXL Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 508.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while AXL trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs ALLG Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs MNRO Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 485.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while MNRO trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -73.68. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs CPS Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 384.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while CPS trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs SES Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 381.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while SES trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs HYLN Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while HYLN trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs HLLY Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 252.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while HLLY trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs HLLY-WT Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs MPAA Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 233.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while MPAA trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs STRT Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 226.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while STRT trades at $54.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs INVZ Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while INVZ trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs XL Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs INVZW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while INVZW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs LAZR Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 157.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while LAZR trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs SRI Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 157.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while SRI trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs CAAS Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 127.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while CAAS trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs KNDI Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while KNDI trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs GGR Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while GGR trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs WPRT Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while WPRT trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs CVGI Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while CVGI trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs MKDWW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs SYPR Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while SYPR trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs NCNC Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs NCNCW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs AMV Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs WKSP Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while WKSP trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs LIDRW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while LIDRW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs ECXWW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while ECXWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs LIDR Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while LIDR trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs SUP Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while SUP trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs FRSX Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while FRSX trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs SAG Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs INEO Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while INEO trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs CREV Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while CREV trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs GGROW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs UFAB Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs WKSPW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs CREVW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 124.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while CREVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs HYZNW Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs HZN Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs RMO Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs VNE Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.
MKDW vs MTOR Comparison
MKDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKDW stands at 46.4M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKDW is priced at $0.32, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKDW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.90, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MKDW's ROE is +1.39%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKDW is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKDW.