Miven Machine Tools Limited

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹4,914.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 60.66. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹4,910.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 60.76. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,056.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 73.80. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ABB.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ABB.BO trades at ₹6,053.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 73.95. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ABB.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,365.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 70.62. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,364.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 70.70. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 912.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹261.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 111.47. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check BHEL.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 911.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹261.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 112.36. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check BHEL.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 503.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,538.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 101.02. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 503.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,537.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 100.15. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 399.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,959.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 80.49. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check GET&D.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 365.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,859.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 364.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,854.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 359B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,148.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 52.66. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 358.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,145.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 52.73. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 262B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,837.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 65.97. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 262B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,838.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 208.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹896.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 85.07. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 204.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,392.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 204.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,395.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 190.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹848.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 172.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹540.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 172B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹540.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 42.55. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while LMW.NS trades at ₹15,490.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 144.99. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check LMW.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 165.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while LMW.BO trades at ₹15,490.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 144.63. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check LMW.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 157.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹484.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.75. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹484.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹888.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 62.73. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 137.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹888.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 62.36. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,782.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 60.65. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check TEGA.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,784.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 60.46. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check TEGA.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 125.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,565.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,569.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.89. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 125B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KSB.BO trades at ₹711.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 47.64. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KSB.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹3,955.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 48.33. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹3,951.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 47.21. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KSB.NS trades at ₹710.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 47.62. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KSB.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 113.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹3,761.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 179.72. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹3,759.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 179.67. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹1,742.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check AZAD.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹507.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.30. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹506.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,155.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹419.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ELECON.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹419.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ELECON.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,136.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,136.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹132.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 68.65. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹132.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 68.57. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹883.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹884.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹538.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹537.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹48.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹48.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check LSIL.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, BALUFORGE.BO has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while BALUFORGE.BO trades at ₹460.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas BALUFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BALUFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check BALUFORGE.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹958.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 254.14. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹960.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 252.73. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹106.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹106.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹395.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check WPIL.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹154.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹154.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.26. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹450.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 41.80. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹450.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,629.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ANUP.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,629.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ANUP.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹498.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while SETL.NS trades at ₹124.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check SETL.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while JASH.NS trades at ₹394.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check JASH.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check GMM.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹315.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹315.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,181.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,187.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹237.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -765.94. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹237.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -758.12. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹1,567.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 57.98. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check KMEW.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,488.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,489.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹141.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check PENIND.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹141.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check PENIND.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,671.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check THEJO.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,065.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ADOR.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,065.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ADOR.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹1,717.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 40.31. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹12,211.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while JYOTISTRUC.BO trades at ₹12.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas JYOTISTRUC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.BO's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹12.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is more volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here

MIVENMACH.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIVENMACH.BO stands at 240.3M. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIVENMACH.BO is priced at ₹76.00, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹245.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIVENMACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.28, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, MIVENMACH.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIVENMACH.BO is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIVENMACH.BO.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here