Airspan Networks Holdings Inc.
Airspan Networks Holdings Inc. MIMO Peers
See (MIMO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIMO | $0.11 | -5.04% | 8.4M | -0.15 | -$0.75 | N/A |
| TMUS | $241.53 | -0.75% | 274.2B | 23.56 | $10.25 | +1.27% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $27.51 | +0.44% | 198B | 16.88 | $1.63 | +4.03% |
| TBB | $21.84 | -0.64% | 196.7B | 4.27 | $5.12 | +6.12% |
| VZ | $43.15 | -0.82% | 181.9B | 10.27 | $4.20 | +6.25% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.22% |
| T-PA | $19.88 | -0.50% | 143B | 8.36 | $2.38 | +4.03% |
| T-PC | $18.82 | -0.58% | 135.4B | 7.92 | $2.38 | +4.03% |
| CMCSA | $34.63 | -0.92% | 129B | 8.53 | $4.06 | +3.64% |
Stock Comparison
MIMO vs TMUS Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 274.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TMUS trades at $241.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs VZA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs T Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, T has a market cap of 198B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while T trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TBB Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 196.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TBB trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs VZ Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 181.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while VZ trades at $43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TBC Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs T-PA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 143B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while T-PA trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs T-PC Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while T-PC trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CMCSA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CMCSA trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs AMOV Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CHTR Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CHTR trades at $407.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs AMX Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while AMX trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CHT Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CHT trades at $44.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs ORAN Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TEF Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TEF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -52.25. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs VOD Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while VOD trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to VOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TU Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TU trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs BCE Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while BCE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 68.27. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TLK Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TLK trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs VIV Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while VIV trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs SJR Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs RCI Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while RCI trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LBRDK Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LBRDK trades at $96.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LBRDA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LBRDA trades at $95.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LBRDP Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LBRDP trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs KT Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while KT trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs MBT Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to MBT's ROE of -6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs FYBR Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while FYBR trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.37. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TIMB Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TIMB trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs SKM Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while SKM trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CTDD Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CTDD trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TIGO Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TIGO trades at $36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TKC Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TKC trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs USM Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while USM trades at $62.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -136.57. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs UZF Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while UZF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs UZE Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while UZE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs UZD Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while UZD trades at $24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs PHI Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while PHI trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LBYKV Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CTBB Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CTBB trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LUMN Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LUMN trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TDS Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TDS trades at $34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -33.20. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TDS-PV Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TDS-PV trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TDS-PU Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TDS-PU trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs SNRE Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while SNRE trades at $51.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LBTYB Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LBTYB trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LBTYA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LBTYA trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -15.32. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LBTYK Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LBTYK trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -15.66. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TEO Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TEO trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 94.09. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs DISH Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs IRDM Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while IRDM trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs GSAT Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while GSAT trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -29.08. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CCOI Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CCOI trades at $46.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -11.72. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs ASTSW Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs IHS Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while IHS trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -40.15. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs IDT Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while IDT trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs RADI Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs GOGO Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while GOGO trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -270.50. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs ATUS Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while ATUS trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LILAK Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LILAK trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LILA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 997M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LILA trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CABO Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 837.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CABO trades at $148.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -41.32. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs SHEN Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 690.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while SHEN trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -17.97. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs RBBN Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 616.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while RBBN trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CNSL Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs ATEX Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 506.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while ATEX trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -16.83. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs OOMA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 369.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while OOMA trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -51.52. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs WOW Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 368M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while WOW trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs HCHC Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs ATNI Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 218.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while ATNI trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TV Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 216M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TV trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs RDCM Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while RDCM trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs FNGR Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 203.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while FNGR trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CXDO Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 158.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CXDO trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs VEON Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while VEON trades at $52.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs MTSL Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs SIFY Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while SIFY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -38.46. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TDI Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TDI trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs KORE Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while KORE trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs PCLA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while PCLA trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs ANTE Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while ANTE trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs UCL Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while UCL trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs QTEKW Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs QTEK Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs COMSP Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs COMSW Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs PTNR Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TIGOR Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs TDA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs GTT Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs UZA Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs OIBR-C Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs STRY Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LORL Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs CBB Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs MIMO-WT Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs LBYAV Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.
MIMO vs ALSK Comparison
MIMO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIMO stands at 8.4M. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIMO is priced at $0.11, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIMO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIMO's ROE is +1.76%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIMO is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIMO.