Mohawk Industries, Inc.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, QIHCF has a market cap of 31.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while QIHCF trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas QIHCF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QIHCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to QIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, HSHCY has a market cap of 30.60B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while HSHCY trades at $11.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas HSHCY's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSHCY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HSHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, HRSHF has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while HRSHF trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas HRSHF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to HRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while TPX trades at $65.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 12.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while SN trades at $92.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, RINIY has a market cap of 8.27B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while RINIY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas RINIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RINIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to RINIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, HWDJY has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while HWDJY trades at $52.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas HWDJY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWDJY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HWDJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, BVILY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while BVILY trades at $43.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas BVILY's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BVILY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to BVILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, HWDJF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while HWDJF trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas HWDJF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to HWDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, HISEF has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while HISEF trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas HISEF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HISEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HISEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, SEBYF has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while SEBYF trades at $82.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas SEBYF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEBYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to SEBYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while WHR trades at $80.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 615.69. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, RINIF has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while RINIF trades at $22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas RINIF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RINIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to RINIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, BVILF has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while BVILF trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas BVILF's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BVILF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to BVILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while PATK trades at $82.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, MAWHY has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while MAWHY trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas MAWHY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAWHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to MAWHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, ACKAY has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while ACKAY trades at $17.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas ACKAY's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACKAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to ACKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, MAWHF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while MAWHF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas MAWHF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAWHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MAWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, ELUXY has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while ELUXY trades at $12.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas ELUXY's P/E ratio is -127.90. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELUXY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to ELUXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while LZB trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, ELRXF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while ELRXF trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas ELRXF's P/E ratio is -125.60. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to ELRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while LEG trades at $9.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, RHUHF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while RHUHF trades at $22.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas RHUHF's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHUHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to RHUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while MBC trades at $9.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while TILE trades at $20.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while MLKN trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 39.02. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 869.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while AMWD trades at $58.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, JGLCF has a market cap of 770.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while JGLCF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas JGLCF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JGLCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to JGLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 663.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while ETD trades at $26.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, CFSKF has a market cap of 647.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while CFSKF trades at $19.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas CFSKF's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to CFSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, RYLHF has a market cap of 576.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while RYLHF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas RYLHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RYLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to RYLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, VLBOF has a market cap of 533.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while VLBOF trades at $26.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas VLBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to VLBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, SEBYY has a market cap of 524.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while SEBYY trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas SEBYY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEBYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SEBYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 298.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while LOVE trades at $20.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 200.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while HBB trades at $14.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 187.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while COOK trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 181.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while SNBR trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 165.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while FLXS trades at $31.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 153.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while BSET trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 141.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while VIRC trades at $8.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, WTWGF has a market cap of 131.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while WTWGF trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas WTWGF's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTWGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to WTWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, VCCTF has a market cap of 120.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while VCCTF trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas VCCTF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VCCTF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to VCCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, WKGBF has a market cap of 104.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while WKGBF trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas WKGBF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WKGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to WKGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 100.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while KEQU trades at $35.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 98.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while HOFT trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 85.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while PRPL trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, IPGGF has a market cap of 81.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while IPGGF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas IPGGF's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPGGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to IPGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 79.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while IRBT trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 72.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while LCUT trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 38.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while NCL trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCL's ROE of -4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, DIIBF has a market cap of 38.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while DIIBF trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas DIIBF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIIBF's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to DIIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 32.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while CRWS trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 30.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while VIOT trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, RGBD has a market cap of 26.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while RGBD trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas RGBD's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGBD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to RGBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 17.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while ATER trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 14.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while NVFY trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -9.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 8.70M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while EFOI trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 8.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while NTZ trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 7.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while FGI trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, DGIX has a market cap of 6.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while DGIX trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas DGIX's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DGIX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to DGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, LUVU has a market cap of 3.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while LUVU trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas LUVU's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LUVU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to LUVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while AUVI trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 431620.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while FGIWW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, KMFI has a market cap of 197266.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while KMFI trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas KMFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KMFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to KMFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, ROWC has a market cap of 3985.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while ROWC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas ROWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROWC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to ROWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, DIAAF has a market cap of 3692.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while DIAAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas DIAAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIAAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to DIAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, DEER has a market cap of 3359.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while DEER trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas DEER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEER's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to DEER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, THBD has a market cap of 1134.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while THBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas THBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THBD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to THBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, PWNX has a market cap of 677.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while PWNX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas PWNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to PWNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, VUOC has a market cap of 570.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while VUOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas VUOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VUOC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to VUOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, PFWIQ has a market cap of 506.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while PFWIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas PFWIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFWIQ's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to PFWIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, FTDL has a market cap of 478.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while FTDL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas FTDL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FTDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, AUVIQ has a market cap of 467.00. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while AUVIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas AUVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUVIQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to AUVIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, ICPBF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while ICPBF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas ICPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to ICPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, KBAL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while KBAL trades at $12.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.

MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.64B. In comparison, WEBR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $106.26, while WEBR trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.