Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Mohawk Industries, Inc. MHK Peers
See (MHK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHK | $101.54 | +0.74% | 6.3B | 13.27 | $7.65 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.62% |
| SN | $87.22 | -0.06% | 12.2B | 27.60 | $3.16 | N/A |
| WHR | $83.12 | +1.29% | 4.6B | 639.38 | $0.13 | +8.41% |
| PATK | $90.31 | -0.31% | 3B | 21.71 | $4.16 | +2.16% |
| LZB | $40.25 | -0.15% | 1.7B | 13.83 | $2.91 | +2.14% |
| MBC | $10.41 | +0.77% | 1.3B | 13.52 | $0.77 | N/A |
| LEG | $9.10 | -0.22% | 1.2B | -2.44 | -$3.72 | +2.19% |
| TILE | $20.14 | +0.30% | 1.2B | 13.79 | $1.46 | +0.20% |
| MLKN | $17.07 | -0.29% | 1.2B | 39.70 | $0.43 | +4.43% |
Stock Comparison
MHK vs TPX Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs SN Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while SN trades at $87.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs WHR Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while WHR trades at $83.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 639.38. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs PATK Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while PATK trades at $90.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs LZB Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while LZB trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs MBC Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while MBC trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs LEG Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while LEG trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs TILE Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while TILE trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs MLKN Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while MLKN trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs AMWD Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 807.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while AMWD trades at $54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs ETD Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 665.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while ETD trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs LOVE Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while LOVE trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs HBB Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while HBB trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs SNBR Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while SNBR trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs COOK Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 200.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while COOK trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs FLXS Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while FLXS trades at $30.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs BSET Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 141.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while BSET trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is -21.34. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs VIRC Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while VIRC trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs IRBT Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while IRBT trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs HOFT Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while HOFT trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs KEQU Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while KEQU trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs VIOT Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while VIOT trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs PRPL Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while PRPL trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs LCUT Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while LCUT trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs NTZ Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while NTZ trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs CRWS Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while CRWS trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs NCL Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while NCL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCL's ROE of -4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs NVFY Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while NVFY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs ATER Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while ATER trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs EFOI Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while EFOI trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs FGI Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while FGI trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs AUVIP Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs AUVI Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs FGIWW Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 396.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs WEBR Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.
MHK vs KBAL Comparison
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $101.54, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.