Mega Uranium Ltd.
Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MGA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGA.TO | CA$0.71 | -6.58% | 269.7M | 71.00 | CA$0.01 | N/A |
| CCO.TO | CA$159.43 | -5.50% | 69.4B | 118.10 | CA$1.35 | +0.14% |
| NXE.TO | CA$16.64 | -4.09% | 11B | -31.40 | -CA$0.53 | N/A |
| U-UN.TO | CA$28.18 | -1.64% | 8B | -11.23 | -CA$2.51 | N/A |
| EFR.TO | CA$28.02 | -4.53% | 6.8B | -53.88 | -CA$0.52 | N/A |
| DML.TO | CA$5.21 | -3.70% | 4.7B | -21.71 | -CA$0.24 | N/A |
| URE.TO | CA$2.33 | +0.43% | 925.8M | -8.32 | -CA$0.28 | N/A |
| URC.TO | CA$4.90 | -1.80% | 717.7M | 122.50 | CA$0.04 | N/A |
| FCU.TO | CA$0.72 | -2.70% | 618.3M | -72.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| LUR.CN | CA$0.24 | +2.13% | 55.5M | -0.75 | -CA$0.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MGA.TO vs CCO.TO Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, CCO.TO has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while CCO.TO trades at CA$159.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas CCO.TO's P/E ratio is 118.10. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to CCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check CCO.TO's competition here
MGA.TO vs NXE.TO Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, NXE.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while NXE.TO trades at CA$16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas NXE.TO's P/E ratio is -31.40. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXE.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to NXE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check NXE.TO's competition here
MGA.TO vs U-UN.TO Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, U-UN.TO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while U-UN.TO trades at CA$28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas U-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to U-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check U-UN.TO's competition here
MGA.TO vs EFR.TO Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, EFR.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while EFR.TO trades at CA$28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas EFR.TO's P/E ratio is -53.88. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFR.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to EFR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check EFR.TO's competition here
MGA.TO vs DML.TO Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, DML.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while DML.TO trades at CA$5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas DML.TO's P/E ratio is -21.71. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DML.TO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to DML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check DML.TO's competition here
MGA.TO vs URE.TO Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, URE.TO has a market cap of 925.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while URE.TO trades at CA$2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas URE.TO's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URE.TO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to URE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check URE.TO's competition here
MGA.TO vs URC.TO Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, URC.TO has a market cap of 717.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while URC.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas URC.TO's P/E ratio is 122.50. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URC.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to URC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check URC.TO's competition here
MGA.TO vs FCU.TO Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, FCU.TO has a market cap of 618.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while FCU.TO trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas FCU.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to FCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check FCU.TO's competition here
MGA.TO vs LUR.CN Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, LUR.CN has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while LUR.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas LUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUR.CN's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to LUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check LUR.CN's competition here
MGA.TO vs WUC.CN Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, WUC.CN has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while WUC.CN trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas WUC.CN's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WUC.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to WUC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check WUC.CN's competition here
MGA.TO vs API.CN Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, API.CN has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while API.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas API.CN's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to API.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to API.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check API.CN's competition here
MGA.TO vs CAKE.CN Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, CAKE.CN has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while CAKE.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas CAKE.CN's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAKE.CN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to CAKE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check CAKE.CN's competition here
MGA.TO vs URZ.V Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, URZ.V has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while URZ.V trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas URZ.V's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URZ.V's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to URZ.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check URZ.V's competition here
MGA.TO vs FFU.V Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, FFU.V has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while FFU.V trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas FFU.V's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFU.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is less volatile compared to FFU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check FFU.V's competition here
MGA.TO vs GREN.CN Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, GREN.CN has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while GREN.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas GREN.CN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GREN.CN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to GREN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check GREN.CN's competition here
MGA.TO vs PAT.V Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, PAT.V has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while PAT.V trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas PAT.V's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAT.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to PAT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check PAT.V's competition here
MGA.TO vs OBRN.CN Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, OBRN.CN has a market cap of 125.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while OBRN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas OBRN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OBRN.CN's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is less volatile compared to OBRN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check OBRN.CN's competition here
MGA.TO vs AZZ.TO Comparison April 2026
MGA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGA.TO stands at 269.7M. In comparison, AZZ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MGA.TO is priced at CA$0.71, while AZZ.TO trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 71.00, whereas AZZ.TO's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, MGA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZZ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGA.TO is more volatile compared to AZZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGA.TO.Check AZZ.TO's competition here