Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See API.CN's competitors and their performance on the CNQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for API.CN and its CNQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| API.CN | CA$0.20 | +5.26% | 39M | 116.28 | CA$0.00 | N/A |
| CCO.TO | CA$141.19 | +4.39% | 57.4B | 74.62 | CA$1.77 | +0.17% |
| NXE.TO | CA$14.91 | +5.82% | 9.9B | -34.89 | -CA$0.43 | N/A |
| EFR.TO | CA$20.87 | +8.64% | 5.2B | -46.56 | -CA$0.45 | N/A |
| DML.TO | CA$4.81 | +10.83% | 4.4B | -15.19 | -CA$0.32 | N/A |
| URE.TO | CA$1.95 | +5.41% | 774.8M | -6.38 | -CA$0.31 | N/A |
| FCU.TO | CA$0.72 | -2.70% | 618.3M | -72.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| URC.TO | CA$3.89 | +1.57% | 613.9M | 139.13 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| MGA.TO | CA$0.63 | +3.28% | 249.5M | 29.53 | CA$0.02 | N/A |
| LAM.TO | CA$0.65 | +6.56% | 190.2M | -22.04 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Cameco Corporation (TSX: CCO.TO)
API.CN vs CCO.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, CCO.TO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while CCO.TO trades at CA$141.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas CCO.TO's P/E ratio is 74.62. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCO.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to CCO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check CCO.TO's competition here
NexGen Energy Ltd. (TSX: NXE.TO)
API.CN vs NXE.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, NXE.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while NXE.TO trades at CA$14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas NXE.TO's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXE.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to NXE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check NXE.TO's competition here
Energy Fuels Inc. (TSX: EFR.TO)
API.CN vs EFR.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, EFR.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while EFR.TO trades at CA$20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas EFR.TO's P/E ratio is -46.56. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EFR.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to EFR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check EFR.TO's competition here
Denison Mines Corp. (TSX: DML.TO)
API.CN vs DML.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, DML.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while DML.TO trades at CA$4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas DML.TO's P/E ratio is -15.19. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DML.TO's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to DML.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check DML.TO's competition here
Ur-Energy Inc. (TSX: URE.TO)
API.CN vs URE.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, URE.TO has a market cap of 774.8M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while URE.TO trades at CA$1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas URE.TO's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to URE.TO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to URE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check URE.TO's competition here
Fission Uranium Corp. (TSX: FCU.TO)
API.CN vs FCU.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, FCU.TO has a market cap of 618.3M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while FCU.TO trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas FCU.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to FCU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check FCU.TO's competition here
Uranium Royalty Corp. (TSX: URC.TO)
API.CN vs URC.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, URC.TO has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while URC.TO trades at CA$3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas URC.TO's P/E ratio is 139.13. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to URC.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to URC.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check URC.TO's competition here
Mega Uranium Ltd. (TSX: MGA.TO)
API.CN vs MGA.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, MGA.TO has a market cap of 249.5M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while MGA.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas MGA.TO's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MGA.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to MGA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check MGA.TO's competition here
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO)
API.CN vs LAM.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check LAM.TO's competition here
Forsys Metals Corp. (TSX: FSY.TO)
API.CN vs FSY.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 141.9M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -58.29. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check FSY.TO's competition here
Labrador Uranium Inc. (CNQ: LUR.CN)
API.CN vs LUR.CN Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, LUR.CN has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while LUR.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas LUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LUR.CN's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to LUR.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check LUR.CN's competition here
Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (CNQ: WUC.CN)
API.CN vs WUC.CN Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, WUC.CN has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while WUC.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas WUC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WUC.CN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to WUC.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check WUC.CN's competition here
Radio Fuels Energy Corp. (CNQ: CAKE.CN)
API.CN vs CAKE.CN Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, CAKE.CN has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while CAKE.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas CAKE.CN's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAKE.CN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to CAKE.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check CAKE.CN's competition here
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN)
API.CN vs GREN.CN Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, GREN.CN has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while GREN.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas GREN.CN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GREN.CN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is more volatile compared to GREN.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check GREN.CN's competition here
Oberon Uranium Corp. (CNQ: OBRN.CN)
API.CN vs OBRN.CN Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, OBRN.CN has a market cap of 125.1K. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while OBRN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas OBRN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OBRN.CN's ROE of -7.40%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to OBRN.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check OBRN.CN's competition here
Azarga Uranium Corp. (TSX: AZZ.TO)
API.CN vs AZZ.TO Comparison August 2026
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 39M. In comparison, AZZ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.20 on the CNQ, while AZZ.TO trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 116.28, whereas AZZ.TO's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AZZ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to AZZ.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.Check AZZ.TO's competition here